Valency is hiring its first Community Manager to "recruit researchers to publish" on Hub. But Hub work pages carry none of the citation meta tags (citation_title, citation_author, citation_pdf_url) that Google Scholar reads, and the Hub sitemap lists no individual works. For a researcher, a paper that does not show up in Scholar barely counts, and that is the first thing the Community Manager will be asked.
First action
Add the citation tags to the work page template and test five pages.
How to measure it
Hub-native works found in Scholar
- Now
- –
- Target
- 90%
- By
- 90 days
Steps
Add tags
citation_title, citation_author, citation_publication_date, citation_pdf_url.
Software Engineer (Full-stack) 2 days
Add structured data
ScholarlyArticle with authors and versions.
Software Engineer (Full-stack) 1 day
Sitemap the works
Monthly sitemap files of every work.
Software Engineer (Full-stack) 1 day
Handle duplicates
Link to the arXiv or DOI version where one exists.
Technical Product Manager 2 days
Submit to Scholar
Inclusion request and test searches.
Technical Product Manager 1 week
Tell researchers
"Your Hub paper is in Scholar" in the publish flow and outreach.
Community Manager ongoing
Why it works
Add the standard Highwire citation tags and ScholarlyArticle structured data to every work and version page, link the PDF, list each work in a sitemap (split by month as it grows), and point works that also live on arXiv or a journal to that version so Scholar groups them. Then submit Hub to Scholar's inclusion process and check that works appear.
Researchers publish where their work gets found and cited. Scholar indexing turns Hub from an extra place to post into part of a researcher's record, and the Community Manager gets an honest answer to "why publish here?".
Ready to use
ChecklistScholar-ready work page
[ ] citation_title [ ] citation_author (one per author) [ ] citation_publication_date [ ] citation_pdf_url to a public PDF [ ] citation_doi or a link to the arXiv version when there is one [ ] ScholarlyArticle structured data [ ] Work listed in a sitemap [ ] Abstract visible in the HTML
Risks and how to handle them
Scholar takes weeks to crawl
Start now and check sample works each week.
Duplicates of arXiv papers
Mark the original version so Scholar clusters them.
Evidence
- Valency HubHub work pages (checked October 22, 2026, two samples) are server-rendered with title, authors, abstract and share-card images, but carry no citation_title, citation_author or citation_pdf_url meta tags and no ScholarlyArticle structured data; one sample showed "1 view". The Hub sitemap lists 13 URLs (home, works index, submit, collections and docs) and no individual works.Source
- HiringCommunity Manager (Berkeley, posted October 9, 2026), Valency's first: "Researchers can smell a sales pitch from a mile away. They trust tools their peers use, papers their peers share"; "Valency Hub just opened as a public alpha"; duties include "Recruit researchers to publish, discover, and discuss on Valency Hub", run Bluesky, X, LinkedIn, YouTube and Discord, host "office hours, AMAs with researchers, demos, and journal-club style discussions", in-person meetups "across Bay Area campuses", and build "Clear attribution from community activity to sign-ups and usage". The post says MCP Bond connects AI systems "to tens of millions of papers and preprints".Source
- Valency HubHub homepage: "Publish your AI-assisted work here. It's versioned like code. Checked by machines before you publish. Reviewed and endorsed by verified humans, in the open"; featured collections include papers by or about the 2026 Nobel laureates (30 works) and recent AI-assisted math and computer science results; sign-up with Google, Microsoft or GitHub.Source
- Your websiteHub page on valency.io: "Think GitHub, for science: publish in the open, follow and fork any paper"; "In some fields, up to 90% of new papers show signs of" AI assistance; free for individual researchers, "Private workspaces and deployments for teams and institutions".Source