Website review, no card needed
10and5.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202643 issues · 79 checks
This review found 43 issues worth fixing on 10and5.com, 18 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
68D- #81,583 of 92,737 reviewed websitesbeats 10%
- #45,982 of 49,346 online storesbeats 6%
- #1,838 of 2,202 WooCommerce storesbeats 13%
Closest competitors among WooCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 4.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 92 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 119 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
1.2 s · 1.1 MB18 images could be 1.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.7 s22 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.7 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.1 s · 418 KiBAbout 418 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 52
52/100Your mobile performance score is 52. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google/Doubleclick Ads and Google FundingChoices and others), adding 857 KiB and 862 ms of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 447 ms
447 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 447 ms of main-thread work and 352 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 3.1 s
A phone's processor spends 3.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Google/Doubleclick Ads adds 250 ms
250 msGoogle/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 250 ms of main-thread work and 315 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
200 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 200 ms).
13 long tasks on the main thread
13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 186 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 27 KiBAbout 27 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 26 KiB3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (26 KiB).
Minify JavaScript
14 KiB14 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Legacy JavaScript
13 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 166 ms
166 msYour server sent the HTML in 166 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.9 s
4.9 sReal visitors wait 4.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 3.4 s
3.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 7.2 s
7.2 sYour largest element takes 7.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “WEBSITE”.
Time to Interactive: 11.4 s
11.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 11.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.9 s
3.9 sThe first text or image appears after 3.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 26% slower for real visitors
+26%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 92 ms to 119 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 514 ms
514 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 514 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Speed Index: 5.2 s
5.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) got 13% slower for real visitors
+13%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.4 s to 4.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 117 ms
117 msReal visitors wait 117 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.008
0.008The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.008, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 8.0 MB in 157 requests
8.0 MBYour homepage downloads 8.0 MB in 157 requests on a phone: images 6.8 MB (73), scripts 1.0 MB (48) and stylesheets 65 KiB (16). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
10and5-newsletter-banner.png weighs 527 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
31 images in older formats
31 images (2.6 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
14 images below the first screen load straight away
14 images further down the page (741 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
1 image far larger than shown
56 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example mobile-logo.png at 1,130 px wide, shown at 244 px. Resized copies would save about 56 KiB.
About 2.3 g of CO₂ per visit
2.27 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.27 g of CO₂e: 272.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
62 text elements with low contrast
62 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
33 tap targets too small
33 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Hidden but focusable
3 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
6 images without alt text
6 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (5 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
9 links without text
9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
4 form fields without a label
4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 checks passed
40 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 10 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (25 characters)
Your title is only 25 characters: “Homepage - Between 10and5”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
272 internal links, 12 external
The homepage links to 272 pages on 10and5.com and 12 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 103 characters
Your meta description is 103 characters: “Between 10and5 is a leading source of information on culture, fashion, art, design, music, and newness.”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://10and5.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, ReadAction, SearchAction and WebPage.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://10and5.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://10and5.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,197 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 96 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
1 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Best practices
18 small tap targets
18 of 43 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Invalid or unexpected token”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 694 words of copy
The homepage carries about 694 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Get in touch with us”.
6 short forms
6 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 68 testimonial or review blocks and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Matomo.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
13 cookies set on arrival
13Opening the homepage sets 13 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
15 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 15 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at 10and5.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2021.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- WooCommerce
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Matomo
- Hosting
- Vultr
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 43 issues on 10and5.com, including 19 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.