Website review, no card needed

1dayclinic.pl logo

1dayclinic.pl website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202633 issues · 84 checks

This review found 33 issues worth fixing on 1dayclinic.pl, 16 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.8 s1.7 sMay 23Nov 71.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20262.6 s
May 30, 20262.6 s
Jun 6, 20262.6 s
Jun 13, 20262.6 s
Jun 20, 20262.6 s
Jun 27, 20262.6 s
Jul 4, 20262.7 s
Jul 11, 20262.4 s
Jul 18, 20262.3 s
Jul 25, 20262.3 s
Aug 1, 20262.3 s
Aug 8, 20262.3 s
Aug 15, 20262.3 s
Aug 22, 20262.2 s
Aug 29, 20262.2 s
Sep 5, 20262.3 s
Sep 12, 20262.2 s
Sep 19, 20262.3 s
Sep 26, 20262.3 s
Oct 3, 20262.3 s
Nov 7, 20261.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
86 ms71 msMay 23Nov 777 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 202678 ms
May 30, 202679 ms
Jun 6, 202683 ms
Jun 13, 202682 ms
Jun 20, 202684 ms
Jun 27, 202678 ms
Jul 18, 202673 ms
Aug 1, 202676 ms
Sep 5, 202684 ms
Sep 12, 202684 ms
Sep 19, 202678 ms
Sep 26, 202678 ms
Nov 7, 202677 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of 1dayclinic.pl (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. 1dayclinic.pl at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. 1dayclinic.pl at 1.4 s1.4 s
  3. 1dayclinic.pl at 2.1 s2.1 s
  4. 1dayclinic.pl at 2.8 s2.8 s
  5. 1dayclinic.pl at 3.5 s3.5 s
  6. 1dayclinic.pl at 4.2 s4.2 s
  7. 1dayclinic.pl at 4.9 s4.9 s
  8. 1dayclinic.pl at 5.6 s5.6 s

Speed

6 to fix64
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.5 s · 11.4 MB

    78 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (11.4 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.2 s

    28 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.2 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 963 KiB

    11 images could be 963 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 64

    64/100

    Your mobile performance score is 64. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Font display

    850 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 850 ms).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    450 ms · 91 KiB

    About 91 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 42 KiB

    About 42 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 10 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 10 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare and YouTube and others), adding 192 KiB and 89 ms of main-thread time.

  • Minify CSS

    9 KiB

    9 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Minify JavaScript

    5 KiB

    5 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 481 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.7 s

    7.7 s

    Your largest element takes 7.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.8 s

    7.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 7.7 s

    7.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 7.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 938 ms

    938 ms

    Real visitors wait 938 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 3 images without width and height

    3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 78 ms to 77 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 76 ms

    76 ms

    Real visitors wait 76 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 21% faster for real visitors

    -21%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.6 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.021

    0.021

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.021, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 13.4 MB in 91 requests

    13.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 13.4 MB in 91 requests on a phone: media 7.7 MB (1), images 4.9 MB (22) and scripts 502 KiB (38). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (155 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (92 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 3.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.79 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.79 g of CO₂e: 454.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8289
  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 3 tap targets too small

    3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 3 images without alt text

    3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (5 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 50 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 8 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 8585
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 3 H1 headlines

    There are 3 <h1> headlines (“Dlaczego 1DayClinic?”, “Usługi i zabiegi” and “1DayClinic”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 34 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 34 pages on 1dayclinic.pl and 7 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Title: 63 characters

    Your title is a healthy 63 characters: “1DayClinic.pl Szpital Chirurgii Jednego Dnia ETER-MED w Gdańsku”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.1dayclinic.pl/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Hospital, ImageObject, MedicalOrganization and Organization.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.1dayclinic.pl/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.1dayclinic.pl/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (625 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 8 pages without a meta description

    https://www.1dayclinic.pl/o-klinice, https://www.1dayclinic.pl/dlaczego-wybrac-nasza-klinike, https://www.1dayclinic.pl/lekarze-w-1dayclinic, https://www.1dayclinic.pl/oferta-zabiegow, https://www.1dayclinic.pl/cennik-uslug and https://www.1dayclinic.pl/dla-pacjenta and 2 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 17 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 7387
  • 9 small tap targets

    9 of 32 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Mixed Content: The page at 'https://www.1dayclinic.pl/' was loaded over HTTPS, but requested an insecure stylesheet 'ht…”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

6 to fix44
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 330 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 330 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

  • Opening hours shown

    Your opening hours are on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 7 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at 1dayclinic.pl, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
Cloudflare

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 33 issues on 1dayclinic.pl, including 13 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25