Website review, no card needed
1q.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202643 issues · 108 checks
This review found 43 issues worth fixing on 1q.com, 18 of them high impact, across 108 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
69DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 5.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 202 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 202 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 174 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 225 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 211 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 228 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 228 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 209 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 228 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 232 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 230 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
21.1 s · 4.4 MB16 images could be 4.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 21.1 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.4 s · 952 KiBAbout 952 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.4 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.0 s25 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.0 s.
Reduce unused CSS
1.0 s · 146 KiBAbout 146 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.0 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 48
48/100Your mobile performance score is 48. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, ZenDesk and Google CDN and others), adding 1.6 MB and 907 ms of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 488 ms
488 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 488 ms of main-thread work and 687 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
ZenDesk adds 285 ms
285 msZenDesk costs a phone 285 ms of main-thread work and 476 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.1 s
A phone's processor spends 2.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Google CDN adds 85 ms
85 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 85 ms of main-thread work and 352 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
200 ms · 22 KiB4 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (22 KiB).
11 long tasks on the main thread
11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 145 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify CSS
130 ms · 6 KiB6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
11 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 11 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 5 ms
5 msYour server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 6.5 s
6.5 sReal visitors wait 6.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 5.3 s
5.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 5.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.6 s
2.6 sReal visitors wait 2.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 43.4 s
43.4 sYour largest element takes 43.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Know Now® 1Q is a consumer engagement platform providing br…”.
Time to Interactive: 43.5 s
43.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 43.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 7.4 s
7.4 sThe first text or image appears after 7.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 14.5 s
14.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 14.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user INP: 241 ms
241 msReal visitors wait 241 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 321 ms
321 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 321 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 13% slower for real visitors
+13%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 202 ms to 230 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+6%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.0 s to 5.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 8.1 MB in 105 requests
8.1 MBYour homepage downloads 8.1 MB in 105 requests on a phone: images 5.7 MB (24), scripts 1.7 MB (40) and fonts 401 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images in older formats
2 images (155 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (155 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.3 g of CO₂ per visit
2.30 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.30 g of CO₂e: 275.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
15 text elements with low contrast
15 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
3 tap targets too small
3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
4 links without text
4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 56 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 5 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (29 characters)
Your title is only 29 characters: “Market Research Platform | 1Q”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
79 internal links, 28 external
The homepage links to 79 pages on 1q.com and 28 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 146 characters
Your meta description is 146 characters: “1Q is a market research platform that allows brands to engage with a mobile audience in real-time based on limitless at…”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://site.1q.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://site.1q.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (904 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
6 pages without a meta description
/feature-videos, /an-open-letter-to-the-consumer-insights-industry, /1q-creates-the-worlds-first-prescription-verified-glp-1-research-panel, /1q-far-exceeds-insights-association-gdqs-data-quality-benchmarks, /cirq-announces-certification-of-1q-to-iso-20252-standard and /beyond-simulation-how-to-turn-synthetic-data-into-strategy-grade-insights have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages share a meta description
/request-demo and /bot-free-market-research-platform use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
2 pages without an H1
/request-demo and /bot-free-market-research-platform have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
2 pages with very little text
/1q-values and /an-open-letter-to-the-consumer-insights-industry have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 34 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://site.1q.com/.
19 small tap targets
19 of 55 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to execute 'appendChild' on 'Node': Unexpected token '<'”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
1 link through redirect chains
1 link go through two or more redirects, for example http://support.1q.com/.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
5 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (site.1q.com).
Valid certificate (50 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR1 verifies for 1q.com and is valid for another 50 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://1q.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 48 links work
All 48 links checked from your homepage (35 internal, 13 external) answered without errors; 1 did not answer within 5 s.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
1q.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
1q.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 30 years old
30 years1q.com was registered in Jul 1996 through Wild West Domains, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Jun 2027
1q.com is registered until Jun 2027.
Content and conversion
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
About 903 words of copy
The homepage carries about 903 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Book Demo (opens in new tab)”.
7 calls to action
The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Login/Register”, “Book Demo” and “Learn More”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 21 testimonial or review blocks and 13 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be 1q.com is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.
Email authentication score: 70/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:mail.zendesk.com ~all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “k2” and “mandrill”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
6 cookies set on arrival
6Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
17 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress 7.1.4
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- AWS
Company
- Headquarters
- Sandy Springs
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 43 issues on 1q.com, including 21 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.