Website review, no card needed

1q.com logo

1q.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202643 issues · 108 checks

This review found 43 issues worth fixing on 1q.com, 18 of them high impact, across 108 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.8 s4.2 sMay 16Oct 315.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20265.0 s
May 23, 20265.1 s
May 30, 20264.5 s
Jun 6, 20264.5 s
Jun 13, 20264.4 s
Jun 20, 20264.4 s
Jun 27, 20264.6 s
Jul 4, 20264.9 s
Jul 11, 20264.9 s
Jul 18, 20264.8 s
Jul 25, 20264.8 s
Aug 1, 20264.5 s
Aug 8, 20264.3 s
Aug 15, 20264.5 s
Aug 22, 20265.0 s
Aug 29, 20265.3 s
Sep 5, 20265.2 s
Sep 12, 20265.3 s
Sep 19, 20265.3 s
Sep 26, 20265.3 s
Oct 3, 20265.4 s
Oct 10, 20265.6 s
Oct 17, 20265.5 s
Oct 24, 20265.4 s
Oct 31, 20265.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
243 ms149 msMay 16Oct 31230 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026202 ms
May 23, 2026202 ms
May 30, 2026212 ms
Jun 6, 2026169 ms
Jun 13, 2026160 ms
Jun 20, 2026164 ms
Jun 27, 2026170 ms
Jul 4, 2026173 ms
Jul 11, 2026179 ms
Jul 18, 2026179 ms
Jul 25, 2026177 ms
Aug 1, 2026172 ms
Aug 8, 2026161 ms
Aug 15, 2026174 ms
Aug 22, 2026190 ms
Aug 29, 2026204 ms
Sep 5, 2026225 ms
Sep 12, 2026211 ms
Sep 19, 2026228 ms
Sep 26, 2026228 ms
Oct 3, 2026209 ms
Oct 10, 2026228 ms
Oct 17, 2026232 ms
Oct 24, 2026227 ms
Oct 31, 2026230 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

10 to fix48
  • Improve image delivery

    21.1 s · 4.4 MB

    16 images could be 4.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 21.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    4.4 s · 952 KiB

    About 952 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.0 s

    25 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.0 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.0 s · 146 KiB

    About 146 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 48

    48/100

    Your mobile performance score is 48. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, ZenDesk and Google CDN and others), adding 1.6 MB and 907 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 488 ms

    488 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 488 ms of main-thread work and 687 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • ZenDesk adds 285 ms

    285 ms

    ZenDesk costs a phone 285 ms of main-thread work and 476 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Google CDN adds 85 ms

    85 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 85 ms of main-thread work and 352 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    200 ms · 22 KiB

    4 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (22 KiB).

  • 11 long tasks on the main thread

    11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 145 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify CSS

    130 ms · 6 KiB

    6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    11 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 11 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 5 ms

    5 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 6.5 s

    6.5 s

    Real visitors wait 6.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 5.3 s

    5.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 5.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors wait 2.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 43.4 s

    43.4 s

    Your largest element takes 43.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Know Now® 1Q is a consumer engagement platform providing br…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 43.5 s

    43.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 43.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 7.4 s

    7.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 7.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 14.5 s

    14.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 14.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user INP: 241 ms

    241 ms

    Real visitors wait 241 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 321 ms

    321 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 321 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 13% slower for real visitors

    +13%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 202 ms to 230 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.0 s to 5.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 8.1 MB in 105 requests

    8.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 8.1 MB in 105 requests on a phone: images 5.7 MB (24), scripts 1.7 MB (40) and fonts 401 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (155 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (155 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 2.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.30 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.30 g of CO₂e: 275.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9093
  • 15 text elements with low contrast

    15 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 3 tap targets too small

    3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 56 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 5 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9281
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (29 characters)

    Your title is only 29 characters: “Market Research Platform | 1Q”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 79 internal links, 28 external

    The homepage links to 79 pages on 1q.com and 28 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 146 characters

    Your meta description is 146 characters: “1Q is a market research platform that allows brands to engage with a mobile audience in real-time based on limitless at…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://site.1q.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://site.1q.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (904 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix88
  • 6 pages without a meta description

    /feature-videos, /an-open-letter-to-the-consumer-insights-industry, /1q-creates-the-worlds-first-prescription-verified-glp-1-research-panel, /1q-far-exceeds-insights-association-gdqs-data-quality-benchmarks, /cirq-announces-certification-of-1q-to-iso-20252-standard and /beyond-simulation-how-to-turn-synthetic-data-into-strategy-grade-insights have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    /request-demo and /bot-free-market-research-platform use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    /request-demo and /bot-free-market-research-platform have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages with very little text

    /1q-values and /an-open-letter-to-the-consumer-insights-industry have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 34 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 7770
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://site.1q.com/.

  • 19 small tap targets

    19 of 55 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to execute 'appendChild' on 'Node': Unexpected token '<'”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

2 to fix86
  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • 1 link through redirect chains

    1 link go through two or more redirects, for example http://support.1q.com/.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

5 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (site.1q.com).

  • Valid certificate (50 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR1 verifies for 1q.com and is valid for another 50 days.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://1q.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 48 links work

    All 48 links checked from your homepage (35 internal, 13 external) answered without errors; 1 did not answer within 5 s.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    1q.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    1q.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 30 years old

    30 years

    1q.com was registered in Jul 1996 through Wild West Domains, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Jun 2027

    1q.com is registered until Jun 2027.

Content and conversion

1 to fix92
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • About 903 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 903 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Book Demo (opens in new tab)”.

  • 7 calls to action

    The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Login/Register”, “Book Demo” and “Learn More”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 21 testimonial or review blocks and 13 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Email authentication

1 to fix70
  • DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)

    DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be 1q.com is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.

  • Email authentication score: 70/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:mail.zendesk.com ~all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “k2” and “mandrill”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 17 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

CMS
WordPress 7.1.4
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
AWS

Company

Headquarters
Sandy Springs

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 43 issues on 1q.com, including 21 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25