Website review, no card needed
4linux.com.br website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202631 issues · 95 checks
This review found 31 issues worth fixing on 4linux.com.br, 14 of them high impact, across 95 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
75CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 221 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 228 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 224 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 229 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 229 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 223 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 234 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 223 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 218 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 207 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 207 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 217 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 223 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 239 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 248 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 248 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 266 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 274 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 277 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 288 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 275 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 277 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.3 s
1.7 s
2.1 s
2.5 s
2.9 s
3.3 s
4linux.com.br does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Render-blocking requests
3.9 s40 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.9 s.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.9 s · 794 KiB17 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (794 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 37
37/100Your mobile performance score is 37 (desktop: 70). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 5.3 s
A phone's processor spends 5.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Reduce unused JavaScript
750 ms · 519 KiBAbout 519 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and TikTok and others), adding 1.0 MB and 1.1 s of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 428 ms
428 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 428 ms of main-thread work and 356 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
17 long tasks on the main thread
17 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 460 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 28 KiBAbout 28 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
36 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 36 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 70 but mobile only 37. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 12 ms
12 msYour server sent the HTML in 12 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 11.6 s
11.6 sYour largest element takes 11.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 16.7 s
16.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 16.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.3 s
4.3 sThe first text or image appears after 4.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.0 s
1.0 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.0 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Speed Index: 7.5 s
7.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Tap response (INP) got 23% slower for real visitors
+23%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 221 ms to 277 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 732 ms
732 msReal visitors wait 732 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 33% faster for real visitors
-33%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.8 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.039
0.039The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.039, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.2 MB in 159 requests
2.2 MBYour homepage downloads 2.2 MB in 159 requests on a phone: scripts 1.5 MB (73), fonts 474 KiB (7) and stylesheets 146 KiB (42). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit
0.61 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.61 g of CO₂e: 73.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
2 text elements with low contrast
2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (22 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 22 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 15 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
36 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 40 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 36 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (71 characters)
Your title is 71 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Cursos, Treinamento, Suporte, Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, IA - 4Linux”.
8 H1 headlines
There are 8 <h1> headlines (“Cursos”, “Consultoria e Suporte” and “Jedai”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Meta description is long (352 characters)
Your meta description is 352 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
20 internal links, 22 external
The homepage links to 20 pages on 4linux.com.br and 22 external pages.
5 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://4linux.com.br/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://4linux.com.br/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (638 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
/politica-de-privacidade/1-1 has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /consultoria/suporte, whose canonical is /consultoria/suporte-ti. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
1 page without an H1
/consultoria/quem-somos has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page slow to respond
/consultoria/suporte took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
8 internal pages checked
We fetched 8 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 8 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 8 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “tailwind is not defined”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
7 of 8 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
1 broken external link
1 link to other sites is dead, for example https://jedai.ai/ (502).
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
6 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (4linux.com.br).
Valid certificate (41 days left)
The certificate from Google Trust Services · WR3 verifies for 4linux.com.br and is valid for another 41 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://4linux.com.br redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
4linux.com.br has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
4linux.com.br's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 25 years old
25 years4linux.com.br was registered in May 2001. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until May 2035
4linux.com.br is registered until May 2035.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 341 words of copy
The homepage carries about 341 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 4 phone links and 0 email links.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 90/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 ip4:54.210.104.57 ip4:186.230.35.154 ip4:186.231.24.235 ip4:54.236.102.165 ip4:187.11.231.229 ip4:34.202.171.41 …”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
8 trackers load before any consent
8Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
17 cookies set on arrival
17Opening the homepage sets 17 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
24 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 24 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner
A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
- It runs WordPress 3.7.1; the current release is 7.1.3.
- 4 plugins are behind their latest release.elementor 4.3.3 → 4.3.5 · cookie-law-info 3.5.6 → 3.5.7 · happy-elementor-addons 3.1.6 → 3.50.1 · essential-addons-for-elementor-lite 6.8.5 → 6.8.6
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress 3.7.1
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Company
- Headquarters
- São Paulo
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This free review found 31 issues on 4linux.com.br, including 14 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.