Website review, no card needed
6lack.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202643 issues · 109 checks
This review found 43 issues worth fixing on 6lack.com, 24 of them high impact, across 109 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
65DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 197 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 185 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 179 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 206 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 226 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 191 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 191 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 162 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.7 s
1.5 s
2.2 s
3.0 s
3.7 s
4.5 s
5.2 s
5.9 s
6lack.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
3.5 s · 2.9 MB119 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.9 MB).
Render-blocking requests
5.5 s56 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.5 s.
Improve image delivery
1.5 s · 2.6 MB53 images could be 2.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.5 s · 1.4 MBAbout 1.4 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 11
11/100Your mobile performance score is 11. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 6.7 s
A phone's processor spends 6.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and transcend-cdn.com and others), adding 3.1 MB and 1.9 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
750 ms · 195 KiBAbout 195 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 702 ms
702 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 702 ms of main-thread work and 618 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google CDN adds 497 ms
497 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 497 ms of main-thread work and 736 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 411 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
1,869 HTML elements
The page has 1,869 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Shopify adds 49 ms
49 msShopify costs a phone 49 ms of main-thread work and 836 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
250 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 250 ms).
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 21 KiB21 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Legacy JavaScript
100 ms · 28 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 28 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 36 ms
36 msYour server sent the HTML in 36 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.40
0.40For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.40 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 17.0 s
17.0 sYour largest element takes 17.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Love is the New Gangsta”.
Time to Interactive: 36.1 s
36.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 36.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 12.8 s
12.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 5.8 s
5.8 sThe first text or image appears after 5.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.6 s
1.6 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.6 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.39
0.39The layout shifts by 0.39 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.0 s to 3.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 156 ms
156 msReal visitors wait 156 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 13% faster for real visitors
-13%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 197 ms to 162 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 9.1 MB in 206 requests
9.1 MBYour homepage downloads 9.1 MB in 206 requests on a phone: images 4.0 MB (67), scripts 3.1 MB (95) and other files 1.0 MB (19). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
28 images far larger than shown
1.0 MB28 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example maxresdefault.jpg at 1,280 px wide, shown at 332 px. Resized copies would save about 1.0 MB.
33 images in older formats
33 images (2.9 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
32 images below the first screen load straight away
32 images further down the page (2.8 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.6 g of CO₂ per visit
2.57 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.57 g of CO₂e: 308.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
12 text elements with low contrast
12 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 41 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (12 characters)
Your title is only 12 characters: “Home - 6lack”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Meta description is short (13 characters)
Your meta description is only 13 characters: “Official Site”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
41 internal links, 48 external
The homepage links to 41 pages on 6lack.com and 48 external pages.
6 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “6lack”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.6lack.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, MusicEvent, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.6lack.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
Opted out of AI training for 1 crawler
robots.txt blocks GPTBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,443 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (44 KiB, 713 links, though it should open with a “# Title” line), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 linked page is broken
Your homepage links to /www.youtube-nocookie.com/watch, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.
4 pages share a meta description
/music, /videos, /tour and /subscribe use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
5 internal pages checked
We fetched 5 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 4 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 4 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
9 small tap targets
9 of 38 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught TypeError: Cannot assign to read only property 'open' of object '#<Window>'”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
15 broken links to your own pages
15 links from your homepage to your own site are broken, for example https://www.6lack.com/www.youtube-nocookie.com/watch?v=0RMKRA7tIUI (404).
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
2 links through redirect chains
2 links go through two or more redirects, for example https://facebook.com/6lack.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block, 1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
6 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (6lack.com).
Valid certificate (97 days left)
The certificate from DigiCert Inc · DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 verifies for 6lack.com and is valid for another 97 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://6lack.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
6lack.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
6lack.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 10 years old
10 years6lack.com was registered in Feb 2016 through CSC Corporate Domains, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Feb 2027
6lack.com is registered until Feb 2027.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 958 words of copy
The homepage carries about 958 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
9 calls to action
The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “Subscribe”, “Stream / Download” and “Register”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (4 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage.
Email authentication
No SPF record
6lack.com has no SPF record, so mail servers can't tell which servers may send email as you. Your mail lands in spam more often, and anyone can send mail pretending to be you.
No DKIM key on the usual selectors
We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.
Domain receives no email
6lack.com has no MX record, so it receives no email. SPF -all and DMARC reject still matter: they stop others sending mail as you.
Email authentication score: 50/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
1 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and TikTok Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
8 cookies set on arrival
8Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
26 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 26 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
- It runs WordPress 6.9.10; the current release is 7.1.4.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress 6.9.10
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Imperva
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 43 issues on 6lack.com, including 21 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.