Website review, no card needed
826valencia.org website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202635 issues · 104 checks
This review found 35 issues worth fixing on 826valencia.org, 15 of them high impact, across 104 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
84BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 94 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 87 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 83 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 85 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 82 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 84 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 84 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 82 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 84 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 84 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 85 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 85 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
7.5 s · 2.9 MB3 images could be 2.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 7.5 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
4.6 s · 1.1 MB41 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.1 MB).
Render-blocking requests
2.8 s7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.8 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.3 s · 425 KiBAbout 425 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 57
57/100Your mobile performance score is 57 (desktop: 58). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused CSS
750 ms · 186 KiBAbout 186 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
400 ms · 26 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 26 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 400 ms faster on a phone.
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, JSDelivr CDN and Adobe TypeKit and others), adding 295 KiB and 124 ms of main-thread time.
Font display
100 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).
4 long tasks on the main thread
4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 92 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.3 s
A phone's processor spends 1.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 302 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 14 ms
14 msYour server sent the HTML in 14 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
First Contentful Paint: 7.7 s
7.7 sThe first text or image appears after 7.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 18.4 s
18.4 sYour largest element takes 18.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 18.4 s
18.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 18.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 8.1 s
8.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.4 s
2.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors wait 1.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-6%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 94 ms to 85 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.4 s
2.4 sReal visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 87 ms
87 msReal visitors wait 87 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 42 ms
42 msScripts block the page for only 42 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.6 MB in 56 requests
4.6 MBYour homepage downloads 4.6 MB in 56 requests on a phone: images 3.2 MB (15), scripts 875 KiB (26) and fonts 306 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
Diver_F-original.gif weighs 1.3 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
2 images far larger than shown
1.1 MB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Diver_F-original.gif at 600 px wide, shown at 85 px. Resized copies would save about 1.1 MB.
5 images in older formats
5 images (1.9 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
4 images below the first screen load straight away
4 images further down the page (556 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit
1.29 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.29 g of CO₂e: 155.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
6 tap targets too small
6 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h3 → h6 and h3 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 38 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
47 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (19 characters)
Your title is only 19 characters: “Home | 826 Valencia”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
18 links with vague text
18 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
82 internal links, 36 external
The homepage links to 82 pages on 826valencia.org and 36 external pages.
5 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “826 Valencia”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.826valencia.org/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: EducationalOrganization, Person and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.826valencia.org/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (960 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
14 pages without a meta description
/about, /team, /news, /events, /careers and /contact and 8 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages slow to respond
/news and /events took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 28 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
7 small tap targets
7 of 21 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
Short HSTS lifetime
HSTS is set, but max-age is 0 days; one year is the recommended minimum.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
6 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (826valencia.org).
Valid certificate (46 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR2 verifies for 826valencia.org and is valid for another 46 days.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
http:// redirects to https
http://826valencia.org redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 43 links work
All 43 links checked from your homepage (30 internal, 13 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
Domain expires in 33 days
826valencia.org is registered until Nov 2026. Make sure auto-renew is on and the card on file is current.
No CAA record
826valencia.org has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
826valencia.org's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
1 checks passed
Domain is 24 years old
24 years826valencia.org was registered in Nov 2001 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 2 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 651 words of copy
The homepage carries about 651 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn more” and “Get your ticket”.
25 calls to action
The homepage has 25 calls to action, for example “Get your ticket”, “Learn more” and “Contact”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 85/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:servers.mcsv.net include:_spf.google.com include:_custspf.clickandpledge.cc include:tigertech.net includ…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google” and “k2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
7 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
- It runs WordPress 7.0.7; the current release is 7.1.3.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress 7.0.7
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This free review found 35 issues on 826valencia.org, including 14 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.