Website review, no card needed

a1data.by logo

a1data.by website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202646 issues · 103 checks

This review found 46 issues worth fixing on a1data.by, 17 of them high impact, across 103 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.5 s2.6 sMay 16Oct 313.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20263.6 s
May 23, 20263.6 s
May 30, 20263.5 s
Jun 6, 20264.3 s
Jun 13, 20264.3 s
Jun 20, 20264.2 s
Jun 27, 20264.3 s
Jul 4, 20264.0 s
Jul 11, 20263.5 s
Jul 18, 20263.8 s
Jul 25, 20263.7 s
Aug 1, 20263.5 s
Aug 8, 20263.1 s
Aug 15, 20262.8 s
Aug 22, 20263.3 s
Aug 29, 20264.2 s
Sep 5, 20263.8 s
Sep 12, 20263.5 s
Sep 19, 20263.4 s
Sep 26, 20263.2 s
Oct 3, 20263.2 s
Oct 10, 20263.1 s
Oct 17, 20262.9 s
Oct 24, 20262.8 s
Oct 31, 20263.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
391 ms103 msMay 16Oct 31136 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026230 ms
May 23, 2026259 ms
May 30, 2026291 ms
Jun 6, 2026351 ms
Jun 13, 2026357 ms
Jun 20, 2026358 ms
Jun 27, 2026353 ms
Jul 4, 2026305 ms
Jul 11, 2026231 ms
Jul 18, 2026174 ms
Jul 25, 2026175 ms
Aug 1, 2026181 ms
Aug 8, 2026177 ms
Aug 15, 2026180 ms
Aug 22, 2026184 ms
Aug 29, 2026287 ms
Sep 5, 2026331 ms
Sep 12, 2026352 ms
Sep 19, 2026353 ms
Sep 26, 2026350 ms
Oct 3, 2026353 ms
Oct 10, 2026333 ms
Oct 17, 2026228 ms
Oct 24, 2026152 ms
Oct 31, 2026136 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

10 to fix59
  • Render-blocking requests

    4.3 s

    10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.3 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.5 s · 1.2 MB

    About 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    550 ms · 18.2 MB

    50 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (18.2 MB).

  • Mobile performance score: 59

    59/100

    Your mobile performance score is 59. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    810 ms · 147 KiB

    About 147 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 810 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Yandex Metrica and others), adding 741 KiB and 651 ms of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    390 KiB

    6 images could be 390 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Minify JavaScript

    384 KiB

    384 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 292 ms

    292 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 292 ms of main-thread work and 351 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Facebook adds 264 ms

    264 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 264 ms of main-thread work and 293 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 9 long tasks on the main thread

    9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 183 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    44 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 44 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify CSS

    40 KiB

    40 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 741 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 20.6 s

    20.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 20.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 11.2 s

    11.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 11.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.9 s

    4.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.9 s

    4.9 s

    Your largest element takes 4.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Сервисы для цифровой трансформации бизнеса”. Most of its time is element render delay (3.1 s).

  • Real-user LCP: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Real visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 243 ms

    243 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 243 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 11 images without width and height

    11 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

7 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 136 ms

    136 ms

    Real visitors wait 136 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 729 ms

    729 ms

    Real visitors wait 729 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 41% faster for real visitors

    -41%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 230 ms to 136 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 18% faster for real visitors

    -18%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.6 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.021

    0.021

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.021, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 20.5 MB in 73 requests

    20.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 20.5 MB in 73 requests on a phone: media 17.1 MB (4), scripts 2.1 MB (20) and images 824 KiB (21). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 5 images in older formats

    5 images (672 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 5.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    5.81 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.81 g of CO₂e: 697.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 7388
  • 5 buttons without a name

    5 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Unlabelled dropdowns

    1 dropdown has no label.

  • 8 text elements with low contrast

    8 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (14 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 14 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 13 form fields without a label

    13 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 12 links without text

    12 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

1 checks passed
  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 8 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 8591
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 25 links crawlers can't follow

    25 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 71 internal links, 0 external

    The homepage links to 71 pages on a1data.by and 0 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 144 characters

    Your meta description is 144 characters: “Крупнейший дата-центр A1 уровня Tier III предлагает полный спектр услуг по организации, поддержанию и развитию инфрастр…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Сервисы для цифровой трансформации бизнеса”.

  • Title: 64 characters

    Your title is a healthy 64 characters: “Размещение инфраструктуры в Дата-центре А1 | ЦОД уровня Tier III”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://a1digital.by/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://a1digital.by/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 5 pages without an H1

    /ai, /s3s, /cloudflex, /s3 and /securityawareness have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 9 pages with very little text

    /data-center, /services, /services/filter/types_of_tasks-is-cloud/apply, /services/private-cloud, /services/gpu-cloud and /services/filter/types_of_tasks-is-information_security/apply and 3 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 44 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7785
  • 4 small tap targets

    4 of 19 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

2 to fix83
  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HTTP/1.1 only

    The server only offers HTTP/1.1, so browsers open several connections and load files more slowly. Most hosts and CDNs turn on HTTP/2 with a setting.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • 2 redirects before the homepage

    Opening https://a1data.by goes through 2 redirects before the homepage loads.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

4 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (a1digital.by).

  • Valid certificate (54 days left)

    The certificate from GlobalSign nv-sa · GlobalSign GCC R6 AlphaSSL CA 2025 verifies for a1data.by and is valid for another 54 days.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://a1data.by redirects to the secure version.

  • All 40 links work

    All 40 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 0 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    a1digital.by has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

Content and conversion

5 to fix43
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • A 10-field form

    Your longest form asks for 10 fields (0 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • Only about 62 words

    The homepage has only about 62 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

2 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Matomo.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

Email authentication

2 to fix35
  • No DMARC policy

    a1data.by has no DMARC record, so nothing tells receivers what to do with mail that fails SPF or DKIM. Gmail and Yahoo require DMARC from bulk senders.

  • No DKIM key on the usual selectors

    We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.

  • Email authentication score: 35/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

1 checks passed
  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 a mx ip4:77.74.32.10 ip4:178.163.161.240 ~all”.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Yandex Metrica (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 14 cookies set on arrival

    14

    Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 12 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • It loads jQuery 1.8.3, older than 3.5 (which fixed known security holes).

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | Matomo
Hosting
A1 By

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 46 issues on a1data.by, including 18 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25