Website review, no card needed

abaoman.org logo

abaoman.org website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202652 issues · 109 checks

This review found 52 issues worth fixing on abaoman.org, 18 of them high impact, across 109 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.5 s2.5 sApr 25Oct 102.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 20262.7 s
May 2, 20262.7 s
May 9, 20262.7 s
May 16, 20262.9 s
May 23, 20262.9 s
May 30, 20263.0 s
Jun 6, 20263.0 s
Jun 13, 20262.9 s
Jun 20, 20262.9 s
Jun 27, 20263.0 s
Jul 4, 20263.1 s
Jul 11, 20263.4 s
Jul 18, 20263.4 s
Jul 25, 20263.3 s
Aug 1, 20263.3 s
Aug 8, 20263.1 s
Aug 15, 20263.0 s
Aug 22, 20262.9 s
Aug 29, 20262.8 s
Sep 5, 20262.8 s
Sep 12, 20262.8 s
Sep 19, 20263.0 s
Sep 26, 20263.1 s
Oct 3, 20263.0 s
Oct 10, 20262.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
251 ms157 msApr 25Oct 10168 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 25, 2026188 ms
May 2, 2026194 ms
May 9, 2026199 ms
May 16, 2026213 ms
May 23, 2026214 ms
May 30, 2026222 ms
Jun 6, 2026207 ms
Jun 13, 2026190 ms
Jun 20, 2026201 ms
Jun 27, 2026213 ms
Jul 4, 2026224 ms
Jul 11, 2026228 ms
Jul 18, 2026239 ms
Jul 25, 2026227 ms
Aug 1, 2026240 ms
Aug 8, 2026238 ms
Aug 15, 2026218 ms
Aug 22, 2026212 ms
Aug 29, 2026181 ms
Sep 5, 2026173 ms
Sep 12, 2026173 ms
Sep 19, 2026174 ms
Sep 26, 2026176 ms
Oct 3, 2026169 ms
Oct 10, 2026168 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of abaoman.org (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. abaoman.org at 0.8 s0.8 s
  2. abaoman.org at 1.7 s1.7 s
  3. abaoman.org at 2.5 s2.5 s
  4. abaoman.org at 3.4 s3.4 s
  5. abaoman.org at 4.2 s4.2 s
  6. abaoman.org at 5.1 s5.1 s
  7. abaoman.org at 5.9 s5.9 s
  8. abaoman.org at 6.8 s6.8 s

abaoman.org does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

13 to fix41
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    7.0 s · 5.6 MB

    67 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (5.6 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    6.8 s · 1.3 MB

    About 1.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    2.5 s · 656 KiB

    14 images could be 656 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.8 s

    8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.8 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.4 s · 119 KiB

    About 119 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 41

    41/100

    Your mobile performance score is 41 (desktop: 38). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and weglot.com and others), adding 23.1 MB and 984 ms of main-thread time.

  • heyzine.com adds 109 ms

    109 ms

    heyzine.com costs a phone 109 ms of main-thread work and 15.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 499 ms

    499 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 499 ms of main-thread work and 855 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • juicer.io adds 60 ms

    60 ms

    juicer.io costs a phone 60 ms of main-thread work and 4.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 14 long tasks on the main thread

    14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 262 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • finalsite.net adds 2 ms

    2 ms

    finalsite.net costs a phone 2 ms of main-thread work and 2.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Font display

    200 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 200 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 40 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 40 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 5 ms

    5 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 9.4 s

    9.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 9.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 21.9 s

    21.9 s

    Your largest element takes 21.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “ABA Oman International School is Muscat’s leading K-12 Inte…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 22.8 s

    22.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 22.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 10.1 s

    10.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Real visitors wait 2.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.13

    0.13

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.13 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 393 ms

    393 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 393 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 27 images without width and height

    27 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.137

    0.137

    The layout shifts by 0.137 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 10% slower for real visitors

    +10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 2.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 168 ms

    168 ms

    Real visitors wait 168 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 12% faster for real visitors

    -12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 188 ms to 168 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

6 to fix19
  • Page weight: 24.4 MB in 149 requests

    24.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 24.4 MB in 149 requests on a phone: other files 11.2 MB (38), images 10.3 MB (74) and scripts 2.5 MB (20). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 4 images over 500 KB

    4 images weigh 3.2 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 7 images far larger than shown

    3.0 MB

    7 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 36201506 at 2,100 px wide, shown at 368 px. Resized copies would save about 3.0 MB.

  • 10 images in older formats

    10 images (4.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 9 images below the first screen load straight away

    9 images further down the page (4.3 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    CopyofFormHeader2.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 6.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    6.91 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 6.91 g of CO₂e: 828.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8791
  • Hidden but focusable

    5 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 4 tap targets too small

    4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 10 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 8 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 9278
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.abaoman.org/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 128 internal links, 15 external

    The homepage links to 128 pages on abaoman.org and 15 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 142 characters

    Your meta description is 142 characters: “Leading, quality International Baccalaureate school in Muscat Oman offering global education for boys and girls from ki…”.

  • Title: 51 characters

    Your title is a healthy 51 characters: “ABA Oman International School | IB School in Muscat”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.abaoman.org/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

2 to fix75
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • Some text only appears after JavaScript runs

    47%

    The HTML your server sends has 1,131 of the 2,395 words a browser shows. AI crawlers don't run JavaScript, so they miss the rest.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 4 pages share 2 titles

    /about-us/al-irfan-campus and /about-us/events all use the title “Our New Al Irfan Campus - ABA Oman International School”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 4 pages share a meta description

    /about-us/al-irfan-campus and /about-us/events use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    /about-us/board-of-directors, /about-us/events and /admissions have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    /about-us/al-irfan-campus took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 65 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    5 of 5 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

8 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (abaoman.org).

  • Valid certificate (76 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE2 verifies for abaoman.org and is valid for another 76 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://abaoman.org redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 51 links work

    All 51 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 11 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    abaoman.org has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    abaoman.org's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 16 years old

    16 years

    abaoman.org was registered in Nov 2009 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Nov 2030

    abaoman.org is registered until Nov 2030.

Content and conversion

1 to fix92
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 2,395 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 2,395 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Inquire”.

  • 18 calls to action

    The homepage has 18 calls to action, for example “Inquire”, “Join Our Team” and “Contact Us”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block and “over 920 students”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Email authentication

1 to fix70
  • DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)

    DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be abaoman.org is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.

  • Email authentication score: 70/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.oliverasp.co.uk ~all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 10 cookies set on arrival

    10

    Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 17 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 52 issues on abaoman.org, including 25 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25