Website review, no card needed
abcf.org website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 8 November 202640 issues · 107 checks
This review found 40 issues worth fixing on abcf.org, 13 of them high impact, across 107 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
78C- #39,776 of 80,724 reviewed websitesbeats 45%
- #22,977 of 39,741 online storesbeats 37%
- #671 of 2,106 WooCommerce storesbeats 63%
Closest competitors among WooCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 5.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 127 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 145 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 119 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
3.3 s · 2.3 MB12 images could be 2.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.3 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.1 s · 1.1 MB95 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.1 MB).
Render-blocking requests
1.9 s18 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, FontAwesome CDN and Facebook and others), adding 1.3 MB and 911 ms of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 56
56/100Your mobile performance score is 56. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused CSS
600 ms · 212 KiBAbout 212 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 512 ms
512 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 512 ms of main-thread work and 529 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused JavaScript
397 KiBAbout 397 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
8 long tasks on the main thread
8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 272 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Main-thread work: 2.2 s
A phone's processor spends 2.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Font display
100 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
55 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 55 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 3 ms
3 msYour server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user TTFB: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors wait 2.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 9.4 s
9.4 sYour largest element takes 9.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 12.8 s
12.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 12.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 6.9 s
6.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.8 s
2.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.7 s
2.7 sThe first text or image appears after 2.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 363 ms
363 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 363 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
7 images without width and height
7 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
5 checks passed
Real-user INP: 127 ms
127 msReal visitors wait 127 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 12% faster for real visitors
-12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 127 ms to 119 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 52% faster for real visitors
-52%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.7 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.0 MB in 134 requests
6.0 MBYour homepage downloads 6.0 MB in 134 requests on a phone: images 4.0 MB (38), scripts 1.1 MB (47) and fonts 530 KiB (12). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (426 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
1 image in older formats
1 image (400 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.7 g of CO₂ per visit
1.69 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.69 g of CO₂e: 203.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (5 elements)
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
5 text elements with low contrast
5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Links look like plain text
1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (21 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 21 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
24 links without text
24 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h5, h3 → h5 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 10 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 7 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“start your prevention era” and “start your prevention era”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Open Graph partly set
Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.
94 internal links, 28 external
The homepage links to 94 pages on abcf.org and 28 external pages.
5 checks passed
Title: 40 characters
Your title is a healthy 40 characters: “Home - American Breast Cancer Foundation”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.abcf.org/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.abcf.org/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,222 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
/breast-cancer-assistance-program and /our-programs/breast-cancer-assistance-program all use the title “Breast Cancer Assistance Program - American Breast Cancer Foundation”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
15 pages without a meta description
/donate, /breast-cancer-assistance-program, /from-awareness-to-access, /our-programs/breast-cancer-assistance-program, /our-programs/education-patient-advocacy-program and /our-programs/community-partnership-program and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /breast-cancer-assistance-program, whose canonical is /our-programs/breast-cancer-assistance-program. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
6 pages slow to respond
/donate, /breast-cancer-assistance-program, /our-programs/breast-cancer-assistance-program, /our-programs/education-patient-advocacy-program, /our-programs/community-partnership-program and /stories took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 34 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
24 of 27 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
2 broken external links
2 links to other sites are dead, for example https://cfccharities.opm.gov/ (503).
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
2 links through redirect chains
2 links go through two or more redirects, for example https://www.facebook.com/pages/American-Breast-Cancer-Foundation/329029404062.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
4 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (abcf.org).
Valid certificate (58 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR2 verifies for abcf.org and is valid for another 58 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://abcf.org redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
abcf.org has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
abcf.org's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 28 years old
28 yearsabcf.org was registered in Jan 1998 through Network Solutions, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Jan 2028
abcf.org is registered until Jan 2028.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 385 words of copy
The homepage carries about 385 words of visible text.
8 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “CALL”.
6 calls to action
The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Shop”, “Contact” and “Call”.
1 short form
A short form (5 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 46 testimonial or review blocks and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.
Opening hours shown
Your opening hours are on the homepage.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be abcf.org is still delivered. Add a report address, check the reports, then move to quarantine.
Email authentication score: 75/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:akaraisin.com include:spf.mailjet.com include:edgepilot.com -all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “default”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
15 cookies set on arrival
15Opening the homepage sets 15 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
22 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 22 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
- 2 plugins are behind their latest release.the-events-calendar 6.18.2 → 6.18.3 · google-language-translator 7.0.1 → 7.0.2
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress 7.1.4
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- WooCommerce
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- WHG Hosting Services Ltd
Company
- Founded
- 1997
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 40 issues on abcf.org, including 20 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.