Website review, no card needed

abiattachments.com logo

abiattachments.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202630 issues · 100 checks

This review found 30 issues worth fixing on abiattachments.com, 13 of them high impact, across 100 checks. The most urgent: youTube adds 1.1 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.1 s1.7 sMay 2Oct 172.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.8 s
May 9, 20261.8 s
May 16, 20261.9 s
May 23, 20261.9 s
May 30, 20262.0 s
Jun 6, 20261.9 s
Jun 13, 20262.0 s
Jun 20, 20262.0 s
Jun 27, 20262.0 s
Jul 4, 20262.0 s
Jul 11, 20262.0 s
Jul 18, 20261.9 s
Jul 25, 20261.9 s
Aug 1, 20261.9 s
Aug 8, 20262.0 s
Aug 15, 20262.0 s
Aug 22, 20261.9 s
Aug 29, 20262.0 s
Sep 5, 20262.0 s
Sep 12, 20262.0 s
Sep 19, 20262.0 s
Sep 26, 20262.0 s
Oct 3, 20262.0 s
Oct 10, 20262.0 s
Oct 17, 20262.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
185 ms113 msMay 2Oct 17177 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026121 ms
May 9, 2026121 ms
May 16, 2026122 ms
May 23, 2026127 ms
May 30, 2026129 ms
Jun 6, 2026130 ms
Jun 13, 2026137 ms
Jun 20, 2026137 ms
Jun 27, 2026137 ms
Jul 4, 2026137 ms
Jul 11, 2026137 ms
Jul 18, 2026137 ms
Jul 25, 2026137 ms
Aug 1, 2026137 ms
Aug 8, 2026144 ms
Aug 15, 2026147 ms
Aug 22, 2026157 ms
Aug 29, 2026163 ms
Sep 5, 2026166 ms
Sep 12, 2026166 ms
Sep 19, 2026168 ms
Sep 26, 2026170 ms
Oct 3, 2026170 ms
Oct 10, 2026171 ms
Oct 17, 2026177 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of abiattachments.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. abiattachments.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. abiattachments.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. abiattachments.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. abiattachments.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. abiattachments.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. abiattachments.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. abiattachments.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. abiattachments.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

abiattachments.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

8 to fix41
  • YouTube adds 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    YouTube costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 986 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 41

    41/100

    Your mobile performance score is 41 (desktop: 74). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 7.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 7.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Other Google APIs/SDKs and Google/Doubleclick Ads and others), adding 1.6 MB and 1.1 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 619 KiB

    About 619 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 17 long tasks on the main thread

    17 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 338 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 1,822 HTML elements

    The page has 1,822 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Adobe TypeKit adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    Adobe TypeKit costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 411 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    170 ms · 146 KiB

    About 146 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 170 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 46 KiB

    2 images could be 46 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 74 but mobile only 41. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 15 ms

    15 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 15 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.26

    0.26

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.26 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 8.5 s

    8.5 s

    Your largest element takes 8.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “WHY CHOOSE ABI? AMERICAN INNOVATION 28 ISSUED PATENTS DIREC…”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 6.0 s

    6.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 6.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 16.7 s

    16.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 16.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.0 s

    7.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 745 ms

    745 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 745 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 44% slower for real visitors

    +44%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 121 ms to 177 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user TTFB: 827 ms

    827 ms

    Real visitors wait 827 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 10% slower for real visitors

    +10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 161 ms

    161 ms

    Real visitors wait 161 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.5 MB in 109 requests

    2.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.5 MB in 109 requests on a phone: scripts 1.1 MB (29), fonts 638 KiB (9) and images 297 KiB (10). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (135 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (25 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.70 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.70 g of CO₂e: 83.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8492
  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 17 text elements with low contrast

    17 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (66 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 66 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • The skip-link target should exist and be focusable (1 element)

    The skip-link target should exist and be focusable: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 45 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 7 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 9298
  • 15 links with vague text

    15 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 93 internal links, 41 external

    The homepage links to 93 pages on abiattachments.com and 41 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 141 characters

    Your meta description is 141 characters: “ABI Attachments offers premium attachments to groom fields, arenas, and manage manure with tractors, ATVs, and UTVs eff…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “A Better Way.”.

  • Title: 44 characters

    Your title is a healthy 44 characters: “Welcome to ABI Attachments - ABI Attachments”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://abiattachments.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://discoverabi.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,396 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (16 KiB, 63 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 36 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 7391
  • 5 third-party cookies

    5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “(0 , C.__dangerousOptInToUnstableAPIsOnlyForCoreModules) is not a function”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    6 of 7 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix94
  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (abiattachments.com).

  • Valid certificate (31 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for abiattachments.com and is valid for another 31 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://abiattachments.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 57 links work

    All 57 links checked from your homepage (37 internal, 20 external) answered without errors; 1 did not answer within 5 s.

Domain and trust

  • DNSSEC is off

    abiattachments.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

3 checks passed
  • Domain is 17 years old

    17 years

    abiattachments.com was registered in Apr 2009 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Certificate issuers are restricted

    CAA records allow only comodoca.com, digicert.com, letsencrypt.org and pki.goog to issue certificates for abiattachments.com, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.

  • Registered until Apr 2027

    abiattachments.com is registered until Apr 2027.

Content and conversion

1 to fix86
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • About 1,111 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,111 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • 23 calls to action

    The homepage has 23 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Learn More” and “Shop Equipment”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and HubSpot.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 3 phone links and 0 email links.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Email authentication

100
  • Email authentication score: 100/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:22246175.spf03.hubspotemail.net include:rp.oracleemaildelivery.com -a…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “selector2” and “k1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 12 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • It runs WordPress 3.7.1; the current release is 7.1.3.
  • 1 plugin is behind its latest release.elementor 4.3.4 → 4.3.5

Stack

CMS
WordPress 3.7.1
Framework
Vue.js
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 30 issues on abiattachments.com, including 17 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25