abonicosmetics.com website review

3 images could be 5.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 13.3 s faster on a phone.

6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.2 s.

Your mobile performance score is 11. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

A phone's processor spends 4.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 1.6 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.

17 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (512 KiB).

8 third-party services load with your homepage (Klevu Search, mothercare.co.id and Google Maps and others), adding 1.4 MB and 946 ms of main-thread time.

About 118 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

About 379 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

mothercare.co.id costs a phone 192 ms of main-thread work and 572 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

Google Maps costs a phone 192 ms of main-thread work and 398 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

The page has 1,856 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

Polyfills for old browsers add 28 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

7 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

Your largest element takes 22.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

The page becomes fully interactive after 22.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.8 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

The first text or image appears after 4.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

The layout shifts by 0.49 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

Visually, the page fills in at 7.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

7 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

Your homepage downloads 7.2 MB in 214 requests on a phone: images 5.5 MB (32), scripts 1.1 MB (130) and other files 510 KiB (42). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

2 images weigh 3.5 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

2 images (3.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example 62-slot-5000.png at 500 px wide, shown at 155 px. Resized copies would save about 130 KiB.

By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.05 g of CO₂e: 246.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

<marquee> elements are deprecated and must not be used: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

All page content should be contained by landmarks: 43 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

Headings skip levels (h1 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

Your title is 80 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “KEMUDITOTO : Daftar Situs Slot88 Clinamen Slot Gacor 5000 Uji Peluang Kemenangan”.

Your meta description is 189 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

The homepage links to 466 pages on abonicosmetics.com and 3 external pages.

There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

Your homepage links to /brand-a-z/addo.html, /brand-a-z/adidas.html, /brand-a-z/airfree.html, /brand-a-z/alamii.html, /brand-a-z/amara.html and /brand-a-z/aqua-scale.html and 8 others, which answer with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop them.

/undang declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.

/ and /undang all use the title “KEMUDITOTO : Daftar Situs Slot88 Clinamen Slot Gacor 5000 Uji Peluang…”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

/undang has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

/undang has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 199 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

8 of 32 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

3 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Synchronous `XMLHttpRequest` on the main thread is deprecated because of its detrimental effects to…”).

6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to font at 'https://www.mothercare.co.id/static/version1741963345/frontend/Codilar/mothercare/id_ID/fonts/mother…”.

1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).

15 links from your homepage to your own site are broken, for example https://www.clinamen.cl/brand-a-z/addo.html (404).

No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

Opening https://abonicosmetics.com goes through 2 redirects before the homepage loads.

No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

clinamen.cl has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

The homepage carries about 559 words of visible text.

abonicosmetics.com has no DMARC record, so nothing tells receivers what to do with mail that fails SPF or DKIM. Gmail and Yahoo require DMARC from bulk senders.

abonicosmetics.com has no SPF record, so mail servers can't tell which servers may send email as you. Your mail lands in spam more often, and anyone can send mail pretending to be you.

We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.

abonicosmetics.com has no MX record, so it receives no email. SPF -all and DMARC reject still matter: they stop others sending mail as you.

Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

Loading the homepage contacts 20 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.