Website review, no card needed

accessdoorscanada.ca logo

accessdoorscanada.ca website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202642 issues · 116 checks

This review found 42 issues worth fixing on accessdoorscanada.ca, 16 of them high impact, across 116 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.5 s1.9 sMay 9Oct 242.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.5 s
May 16, 20262.6 s
May 23, 20262.6 s
May 30, 20262.6 s
Jun 6, 20262.5 s
Jun 13, 20262.4 s
Jun 20, 20262.3 s
Jun 27, 20262.2 s
Jul 4, 20262.3 s
Jul 11, 20262.3 s
Jul 18, 20262.2 s
Jul 25, 20262.3 s
Aug 1, 20263.0 s
Aug 8, 20263.8 s
Aug 15, 20264.2 s
Aug 22, 20264.2 s
Aug 29, 20264.1 s
Sep 5, 20263.6 s
Sep 12, 20263.2 s
Sep 19, 20263.3 s
Sep 26, 20263.3 s
Oct 3, 20263.2 s
Oct 10, 20262.7 s
Oct 17, 20262.4 s
Oct 24, 20262.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
147 ms79 msMay 9Oct 2496 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026108 ms
May 16, 2026111 ms
May 23, 2026105 ms
May 30, 2026113 ms
Jun 6, 2026104 ms
Jun 13, 202693 ms
Jun 20, 202688 ms
Jun 27, 202687 ms
Jul 4, 202688 ms
Jul 11, 202691 ms
Jul 18, 202695 ms
Jul 25, 202695 ms
Aug 1, 2026109 ms
Aug 8, 2026133 ms
Aug 15, 2026139 ms
Aug 22, 2026139 ms
Aug 29, 2026139 ms
Sep 5, 2026125 ms
Sep 12, 2026121 ms
Sep 19, 2026123 ms
Sep 26, 2026124 ms
Oct 3, 2026118 ms
Oct 10, 202696 ms
Oct 17, 202696 ms
Oct 24, 202696 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

10 to fix60
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.1 s · 456 KiB

    About 456 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.8 s · 564 KiB

    52 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (564 KiB).

  • 4,394 HTML elements

    The page has 4,394 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Mobile performance score: 60

    60/100

    Your mobile performance score is 60. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    860 ms · 115 KiB

    About 115 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 860 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Bigcommerce, Klaviyo and PageSense and others), adding 1.6 MB and 688 ms of main-thread time.

  • Render-blocking requests

    800 ms

    15 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 800 ms.

  • Bigcommerce adds 148 ms

    148 ms

    Bigcommerce costs a phone 148 ms of main-thread work and 629 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Klaviyo adds 106 ms

    106 ms

    Klaviyo costs a phone 106 ms of main-thread work and 313 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    50 ms · 149 KiB

    16 images could be 149 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 50 ms faster on a phone.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 121 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    27 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 27 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify CSS

    24 KiB

    24 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Minify JavaScript

    7 KiB

    7 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    2 KiB

    2 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 33 ms

    33 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 33 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 15.1 s

    15.1 s

    Your largest element takes 15.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “HomePage Banner”.

  • Time to Interactive: 15.1 s

    15.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 15.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.9 s

    3.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.3 s

    7.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 99 images without width and height

    99 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.03

    0.03

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 754 ms

    754 ms

    Real visitors wait 754 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 12% faster for real visitors

    -12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 108 ms to 96 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 67 ms

    67 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 67 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.1 MB in 218 requests

    2.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.1 MB in 218 requests on a phone: scripts 1.2 MB (70), images 407 KiB (72) and stylesheets 164 KiB (18). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (24 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.59 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.59 g of CO₂e: 71.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

14 to fixGoogle 6883
  • 3 buttons without a name

    3 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Images must have alternative text (2 elements)

    Images must have alternative text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 22 tap targets too small

    22 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • Hidden but focusable

    7 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (3 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (2 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (2 elements)

    Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 62 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 14 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 8594
  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, FAQPage, LocalBusiness and Organization) but with 1 problem, for example “Service: no offers (price) block”.

  • 2 links crawlers can't follow

    2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 1,391 internal links, 0 external

    The homepage links to 1,391 pages on accessdoorscanada.ca and 0 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 155 characters

    Your meta description is 155 characters: “Commercial access doors and panels for walls and ceilings. We offer a wide range of high-quality products including fir…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Access Doors Canada”.

  • Title: 56 characters

    Your title is a healthy 56 characters: “Commercial Access Doors and Panels for Walls and Ceiling”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://accessdoorscanada.ca/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://accessdoorscanada.ca/xmlsitemap.php.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and contact details; sameAs (social profiles) and description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,385 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 13 pages without an H1

    /apply-for-credit, /any-surface-doors, /ceiling-access-doors, /door-louvre-window-kits, /duct-access-doors and /drywall-access-doors and 7 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    /fire-rated-access-doors took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 130 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9271
  • 2 broken images

    2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=27015628&Ver=2&mid=95057cbc-022c-4bf1-840a-b9d5180f4721&bo=1&sid=ca0fdb20d64b11f18430c3c50147a32d&vid=ca1007c0d64b11f188b8376bed13a815&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&lg.

  • 18 small tap targets

    18 of 40 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “analytics is not defined”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix92
  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • Short HSTS lifetime

    HSTS is set, but max-age is 0 days; one year is the recommended minimum.

  • 1 link through redirect chains

    1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://accessdoorscanada.ca/orderstatus.php.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

5 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (accessdoorscanada.ca).

  • Valid certificate (62 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for accessdoorscanada.ca and is valid for another 62 days.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://accessdoorscanada.ca redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 40 links work

    All 40 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 0 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

1 to fix
  • Domain expires in 46 days

    accessdoorscanada.ca is registered until Dec 2026. Make sure auto-renew is on and the card on file is current.

  • No CAA record

    accessdoorscanada.ca has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    accessdoorscanada.ca's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

1 checks passed
  • Domain is 11 years old

    11 years

    accessdoorscanada.ca was registered in Dec 2014 through Go Daddy Domains Canada, Inc. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

Content and conversion

100
  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 338 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 338 words of visible text.

8 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Register” and “Apply For Credit”.

  • 16 calls to action

    The homepage has 16 calls to action, for example “Register”, “Order Status” and “APPLY FOR CREDIT”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 30 customer or partner logos and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

  • LocalBusiness structured data

    Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.

Email authentication

1 to fix90
  • No DKIM key on the usual selectors

    We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.

  • Email authentication score: 90/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.bigcommerce.com -all”.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Microsoft Ads (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 31 cookies set on arrival

    31

    Opening the homepage sets 31 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 34 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 34 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
BigCommerce
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Bigcommerce

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 42 issues on accessdoorscanada.ca, including 17 speed issues and 2 SEO issues. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25