Website review, no card needed
accessdoorscanada.ca website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202642 issues · 116 checks
This review found 42 issues worth fixing on accessdoorscanada.ca, 16 of them high impact, across 116 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
84B- #13,975 of 80,566 reviewed websitesbeats 78%
- #8,089 of 39,626 online storesbeats 74%
- #63 of 715 BigCommerce storesbeats 89%
Closest competitors among BigCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 108 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 111 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 105 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 91 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 96 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.1 s · 456 KiBAbout 456 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.8 s · 564 KiB52 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (564 KiB).
4,394 HTML elements
The page has 4,394 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Mobile performance score: 60
60/100Your mobile performance score is 60. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused CSS
860 ms · 115 KiBAbout 115 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 860 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Bigcommerce, Klaviyo and PageSense and others), adding 1.6 MB and 688 ms of main-thread time.
Render-blocking requests
800 ms15 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 800 ms.
Bigcommerce adds 148 ms
148 msBigcommerce costs a phone 148 ms of main-thread work and 629 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.1 s
A phone's processor spends 2.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Klaviyo adds 106 ms
106 msKlaviyo costs a phone 106 ms of main-thread work and 313 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
50 ms · 149 KiB16 images could be 149 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 50 ms faster on a phone.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 121 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
27 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 27 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify CSS
24 KiB24 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Minify JavaScript
7 KiB7 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Duplicated JavaScript
2 KiB2 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
1 checks passed
Server response: 33 ms
33 msYour server sent the HTML in 33 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 15.1 s
15.1 sYour largest element takes 15.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “HomePage Banner”.
Time to Interactive: 15.1 s
15.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 15.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.9 s
3.9 sThe first text or image appears after 3.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.3 s
7.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
99 images without width and height
99 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.03
0.03For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 754 ms
754 msReal visitors wait 754 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 12% faster for real visitors
-12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 108 ms to 96 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 67 ms
67 msScripts block the page for only 67 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.1 MB in 218 requests
2.1 MBYour homepage downloads 2.1 MB in 218 requests on a phone: scripts 1.2 MB (70), images 407 KiB (72) and stylesheets 164 KiB (18). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (24 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit
0.59 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.59 g of CO₂e: 71.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
3 buttons without a name
3 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Images must have alternative text (2 elements)
Images must have alternative text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
22 tap targets too small
22 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
Hidden but focusable
7 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (3 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (2 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (2 elements)
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 checks passed
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 62 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 14 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, FAQPage, LocalBusiness and Organization) but with 1 problem, for example “Service: no offers (price) block”.
2 links crawlers can't follow
2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
1,391 internal links, 0 external
The homepage links to 1,391 pages on accessdoorscanada.ca and 0 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 155 characters
Your meta description is 155 characters: “Commercial access doors and panels for walls and ceilings. We offer a wide range of high-quality products including fir…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Access Doors Canada”.
Title: 56 characters
Your title is a healthy 56 characters: “Commercial Access Doors and Panels for Walls and Ceiling”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://accessdoorscanada.ca/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://accessdoorscanada.ca/xmlsitemap.php.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and contact details; sameAs (social profiles) and description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,385 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
13 pages without an H1
/apply-for-credit, /any-surface-doors, /ceiling-access-doors, /door-louvre-window-kits, /duct-access-doors and /drywall-access-doors and 7 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page slow to respond
/fire-rated-access-doors took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 130 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 broken images
2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=27015628&Ver=2&mid=95057cbc-022c-4bf1-840a-b9d5180f4721&bo=1&sid=ca0fdb20d64b11f18430c3c50147a32d&vid=ca1007c0d64b11f188b8376bed13a815&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&lg.
18 small tap targets
18 of 40 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “analytics is not defined”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
Short HSTS lifetime
HSTS is set, but max-age is 0 days; one year is the recommended minimum.
1 link through redirect chains
1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://accessdoorscanada.ca/orderstatus.php.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
5 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (accessdoorscanada.ca).
Valid certificate (62 days left)
The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for accessdoorscanada.ca and is valid for another 62 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://accessdoorscanada.ca redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 40 links work
All 40 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 0 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
Domain expires in 46 days
accessdoorscanada.ca is registered until Dec 2026. Make sure auto-renew is on and the card on file is current.
No CAA record
accessdoorscanada.ca has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
accessdoorscanada.ca's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
1 checks passed
Domain is 11 years old
11 yearsaccessdoorscanada.ca was registered in Dec 2014 through Go Daddy Domains Canada, Inc. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Content and conversion
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 338 words of copy
The homepage carries about 338 words of visible text.
8 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Register” and “Apply For Credit”.
16 calls to action
The homepage has 16 calls to action, for example “Register”, “Order Status” and “APPLY FOR CREDIT”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 30 customer or partner logos and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
LocalBusiness structured data
Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.
Email authentication
No DKIM key on the usual selectors
We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.
Email authentication score: 90/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.bigcommerce.com -all”.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Microsoft Ads (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
31 cookies set on arrival
31Opening the homepage sets 31 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
34 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 34 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- BigCommerce
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Bigcommerce
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 42 issues on accessdoorscanada.ca, including 17 speed issues and 2 SEO issues. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.