Website review, no card needed
accessphysicians.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202645 issues · 110 checks
This review found 45 issues worth fixing on accessphysicians.com, 16 of them high impact, across 110 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
74CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 96 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 100 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 99 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
6.2 s · 1.3 MBAbout 1.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.2 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.1 s · 578 KiB20 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (578 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
1.9 s13 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.
Reduce unused CSS
1.4 s · 205 KiBAbout 205 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Hubspot and Accessibe Accessibility Overlay and others), adding 1.9 MB and 897 ms of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 50
50/100Your mobile performance score is 50. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Google Tag Manager adds 440 ms
440 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 440 ms of main-thread work and 881 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
300 ms · 48 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 48 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
329 KiB2 images could be 329 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Minify JavaScript
300 ms · 12 KiB12 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Main-thread work: 2.9 s
A phone's processor spends 2.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
2,043 HTML elements
The page has 2,043 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Hubspot adds 166 ms
166 msHubspot costs a phone 166 ms of main-thread work and 318 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
10 long tasks on the main thread
10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 134 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 7 ms
7 msYour server sent the HTML in 7 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 24.0 s
24.0 sYour largest element takes 24.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 24.2 s
24.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 24.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 5.7 s
5.7 sThe first text or image appears after 5.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.2 s
9.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.6 s
3.6 sReal visitors wait 3.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 30% slower for real visitors
+30%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.8 s
2.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors wait 1.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 299 ms
299 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 299 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 96 ms to 99 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 113 ms
113 msReal visitors wait 113 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.05
0.05For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.05 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.061
0.061The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.061, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.7 MB in 116 requests
3.7 MBYour homepage downloads 3.7 MB in 116 requests on a phone: scripts 2.5 MB (38), fonts 558 KiB (23) and images 395 KiB (16). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images in older formats
2 images (179 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit
1.06 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.06 g of CO₂e: 127.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Required ARIA attributes must be provided (9 elements)
Required ARIA attributes must be provided: 9 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
27 text elements with low contrast
27 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Interactive controls must not be nested (9 elements)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 9 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (15 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 15 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (9 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 9 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h1 → h3 and h1 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 77 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
7 H1 headlines
There are 7 <h1> headlines (“Clinical Excellence in Acute Care Telemedicine”, “Clinical Excellence in Acute Care Telemedicine” and “We have the experience and expertise you need to …”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
148 internal links, 10 external
The homepage links to 148 pages on accessphysicians.com and 10 external pages.
5 checks passed
Title: 41 characters
Your title is a healthy 41 characters: “Acute Care Telemedicine | Access TeleCare”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://accesstelecare.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://accesstelecare.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,221 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page is broken
Your homepage links to /about/careers/clinician-careers, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.
1 page without a meta description
/who-we-serve/hospitals-and-health-systems has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 58 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=187207281&Ver=2&mid=33eeed45-4f7d-40db-ae81-5c216affc161&bo=1&sid=9473da20d73711f1b1570f3c00e0c69c&vid=9473e8a0d73711f1a7a2f5b20408cccc&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&l.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “missing ) after argument list”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
19 of 23 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
1 broken link to your own pages
1 link from your homepage to your own site is broken, for example https://accesstelecare.com/about/careers/clinician-careers/ (404).
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
4 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (accesstelecare.com).
Valid certificate (61 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR2 verifies for accessphysicians.com and is valid for another 61 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://accessphysicians.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
accesstelecare.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
accesstelecare.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 4 years old
4 yearsaccesstelecare.com was registered in Jun 2022 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Jun 2028
accesstelecare.com is registered until Jun 2028.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,105 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,105 words of visible text.
7 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Us” and “Contact Us Now”.
6 calls to action
The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Or Call 817-841-8405”, “Contact Us” and “Contact Us Now”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo and 2 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 1 email link.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be accessphysicians.com is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.
Email authentication score: 75/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:_spf.salesforce.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1” and “k1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
20 cookies set on arrival
20Opening the homepage sets 20 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
32 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 32 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
- 1 plugin is behind its latest release.pixelyoursite 2.3.1 → 11.4.4
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- AWS
Hiring
- Hiring
- 3 open roles
- Job board
- adp
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 45 issues on accessphysicians.com, including 23 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.