Website review, no card needed

acofarma.com logo

acofarma.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202649 issues · 106 checks

This review found 49 issues worth fixing on acofarma.com, 19 of them high impact, across 106 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.9 s3.7 sApr 25Oct 103.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 20263.7 s
May 2, 20263.7 s
May 9, 20263.8 s
May 16, 20263.8 s
May 23, 20263.8 s
May 30, 20263.8 s
Jun 6, 20263.7 s
Jun 13, 20263.7 s
Jun 20, 20263.7 s
Jun 27, 20263.8 s
Jul 4, 20263.8 s
Jul 11, 20263.8 s
Jul 18, 20263.8 s
Jul 25, 20263.8 s
Aug 1, 20263.8 s
Aug 8, 20263.8 s
Aug 15, 20263.8 s
Aug 22, 20263.8 s
Aug 29, 20263.8 s
Sep 5, 20263.8 s
Sep 12, 20263.8 s
Sep 19, 20263.8 s
Sep 26, 20263.8 s
Oct 3, 20263.8 s
Oct 10, 20263.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
154 ms131 msApr 25Oct 10134 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 25, 2026151 ms
May 2, 2026149 ms
May 9, 2026146 ms
May 16, 2026145 ms
May 23, 2026146 ms
May 30, 2026146 ms
Jun 6, 2026145 ms
Jun 13, 2026145 ms
Jun 20, 2026146 ms
Jun 27, 2026146 ms
Jul 4, 2026146 ms
Jul 11, 2026146 ms
Jul 18, 2026142 ms
Jul 25, 2026139 ms
Aug 1, 2026139 ms
Aug 8, 2026140 ms
Aug 15, 2026140 ms
Aug 22, 2026139 ms
Aug 29, 2026137 ms
Sep 5, 2026136 ms
Sep 12, 2026137 ms
Sep 19, 2026138 ms
Sep 26, 2026136 ms
Oct 3, 2026136 ms
Oct 10, 2026134 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of acofarma.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. acofarma.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. acofarma.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. acofarma.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  4. acofarma.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  5. acofarma.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  6. acofarma.com at 3.7 s3.7 s
  7. acofarma.com at 4.3 s4.3 s
  8. acofarma.com at 4.9 s4.9 s

acofarma.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

10 to fix37
  • Improve image delivery

    4.0 s · 799 KiB

    2 images could be 799 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.1 s · 830 KiB

    About 830 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.7 s

    20 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.7 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 37

    37/100

    Your mobile performance score is 37 (desktop: 74). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 1.5 MB and 1.6 s of main-thread time.

  • Google CDN adds 990 ms

    990 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 990 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    600 ms · 94 KiB

    About 94 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 468 ms

    468 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 468 ms of main-thread work and 285 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 4.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 18 long tasks on the main thread

    18 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 332 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify JavaScript

    12 KiB

    12 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 74 but mobile only 37. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 206 ms

    206 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 206 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 22.4 s

    22.4 s

    Your largest element takes 22.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 25.1 s

    25.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 25.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.3 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 7.7 s

    7.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.7 s to 3.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 134 ms

    134 ms

    Real visitors wait 134 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 10% faster for real visitors

    -10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 151 ms to 134 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix25
  • Page weight: 5.9 MB in 85 requests

    5.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.9 MB in 85 requests on a phone: images 3.2 MB (20), scripts 1.5 MB (28) and fonts 521 KiB (17). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images over 500 KB

    3 images weigh 2.4 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 5 images far larger than shown

    1.8 MB

    5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Productos-veganos-banner.jpg at 2,000 px wide, shown at 400 px. Resized copies would save about 1.8 MB.

  • 6 images in older formats

    6 images (2.9 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.66 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.66 g of CO₂e: 199.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

11 to fixGoogle 8787
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (37 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 37 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Heading levels should only increase by one (1 element)

    Heading levels should only increase by one: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 33 links without text

    33 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (2 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (2 elements)

    Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 38 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9284
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (Organization and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: sameAs is an empty list”.

  • 3 links crawlers can't follow

    3 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 193 internal links, 15 external

    The homepage links to 193 pages on acofarma.com and 15 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 147 characters

    Your meta description is 147 characters: “Somos un laboratorio de primer nivel, propiedad de las farmacias españolas. Nuestro compromiso con la sociedad es democ…”.

  • Title: 50 characters

    Your title is a healthy 50 characters: “Acofarma, la marca de la farmacia y la cooperativa”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.acofarma.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.acofarma.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,159 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 5 pages without a meta description

    /catalogo/marcas/nesira, /catalogo/categoria/confort-y-golpes/confort, /catalogo/categoria/confort-y-golpes/golpes, /catalogo/categoria/confort-y-golpes/calor-frio and /catalogo/categoria/primeros-auxilios/sueros have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    /catalogo/marcas/nesira, /catalogo/marcas/acofar and /en have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 8 pages slow to respond

    /catalogo/marcas/nesira, /catalogo/red-de-farmacias, /en, /catalogo, /catalogo/categoria/baby and /catalogo/categoria/confort-y-golpes/confort and 2 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 148 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    12 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 12 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 96100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    31 of 34 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix94
  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • 2 links through redirect chains

    2 links go through two or more redirects, for example https://acofarmashop.com/.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (acofarma.com).

  • Valid certificate (114 days left)

    The certificate from DigiCert Inc · GeoTrust EV RSA CA G2 verifies for acofarma.com and is valid for another 114 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://acofarma.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 51 links work

    All 51 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 11 external) answered without errors; 32 did not answer within 5 s.

Domain and trust

1 to fix
  • Domain expires in 87 days

    acofarma.com is registered until Jan 2027. Make sure auto-renew is on and the card on file is current.

  • No CAA record

    acofarma.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    acofarma.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

1 checks passed
  • Domain is 27 years old

    27 years

    acofarma.com was registered in Jan 1999 through EuroDNS S.A.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

Content and conversion

4 to fix42
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 485 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 485 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel.

Email authentication

1 to fix75
  • DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)

    DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be acofarma.com is still delivered. Add a report address, check the reports, then move to quarantine.

  • Email authentication score: 75/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com ip4:195.76.178.140 a:acofarma.send.joopbox.com include:amazonses.com -all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “k2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 8 cookies set on arrival

    8

    Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 7 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • It runs WordPress 7.0.7; the current release is 7.1.3.
  • 4 plugins are behind their latest release.wordpress-popular-posts 7.4.0 → 7.4.3 · instagram-feed 6.11.3 → 6.14.0 · woocommerce 9.4.2 → 11.2.1 · woocommerce-multilingual 5.5.6 → 5.6.3

Stack

CMS
WordPress 7.0.7
Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
WooCommerce
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 49 issues on acofarma.com, including 20 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25