acquirent.com website review

11 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.9 s.

10 images could be 1.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

About 384 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.

Your mobile performance score is 48 (desktop: 74). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Google Analytics and others), adding 1.1 MB and 1.0 s of main-thread time.

Google Tag Manager costs a phone 807 ms of main-thread work and 902 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

About 34 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 580 ms faster on a phone.

8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 275 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

4 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (32 KiB).

Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

Desktop scores 74 but mobile only 48. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

Your largest element takes 20.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “logo”.

The page becomes fully interactive after 20.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

The first text or image appears after 5.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

Visually, the page fills in at 6.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

Scripts block taps and scrolling for 483 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

6 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

RMA-NateCrouchPhoto-146-scaled.jpg weighs 511 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example RMA-NateCrouchPhoto-146-scaled.jpg at 2,560 px wide, shown at 318 px. Resized copies would save about 495 KiB.

Your homepage downloads 3.9 MB in 98 requests on a phone: images 2.6 MB (40), scripts 1.0 MB (13) and fonts 212 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

8 images further down the page (1.2 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

2 images (574 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.12 g of CO₂e: 134.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

Interactive controls must not be nested: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

7 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

4 elements have a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.

9 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

All page content should be contained by landmarks: 36 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

12 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

Headings skip levels (h1 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

The homepage links to 84 pages on acquirent.com and 6 external pages.

There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

/about-us/team has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 25 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=5213319&Ver=2&mid=d1df1666-0a53-40a5-9332-75cab9e670cc&bo=1&sid=5d6d6900cdc611f1b0825d1e7e5cad05&vid=5d6d80b0cdc611f1b0ae5b1fa0649dd1&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&lg=.

1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “jQuery is not defined”.

No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://acquirent.com/about-us/craftjack-case-study/.

No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

acquirent.com is registered until Dec 2026. Make sure auto-renew is on and the card on file is current.

acquirent.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

acquirent.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

The homepage carries about 408 words of visible text.

Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and LinkedIn Insight and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

Opening the homepage sets 16 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

Loading the homepage contacts 19 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.