Website review, no card needed

adam-fields.com logo

adam-fields.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 8 November 202627 issues · 68 checks

This review found 27 issues worth fixing on adam-fields.com, 8 of them high impact, across 68 checks. The most urgent: 7 tap targets too small. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Full-page screenshot of adam-fields.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. adam-fields.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. adam-fields.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. adam-fields.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. adam-fields.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. adam-fields.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. adam-fields.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. adam-fields.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. adam-fields.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

adam-fields.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

3 to fix100
  • Render-blocking requests

    750 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 750 ms.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    723 KiB

    9 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (723 KiB).

  • Improve image delivery

    614 KiB

    6 images could be 614 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 1 third-party service on the page

    1 third-party service load with your homepage (Google Fonts), adding 91 KiB and 1 ms of main-thread time.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

3 checks passed
  • Mobile performance score: 100

    100/100

    Your mobile performance score is 100. That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).

  • Main-thread work: 0.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 7 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

100
  • Not enough real-visitor data yet

    Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

6 checks passed
  • First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.028

    0.028

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.028, good is under 0.1).

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Your largest element renders in 1.4 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “Applying for ACA Marketplace Health Insurance gives you acc…”.

  • Speed Index: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 1.4 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    The page is fully interactive after 1.4 s.

Images and page weight

100
  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (25 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.23 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.23 g of CO₂e: 27.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Page weight: 817 KiB in 13 requests

    817 KiB

    Your homepage downloads 817 KiB in 13 requests on a phone: images 719 KiB (6), fonts 88 KiB (2) and stylesheets 6 KiB (2). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 6986
  • 7 tap targets too small

    7 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 2 images without alt text

    2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

1 checks passed
  • 23 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 28 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 23 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

9 to fixGoogle 8264
  • Title is long (76 characters)

    Your title is 76 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Adam Fields - Medicare Advantage/Supplement, ACA, & ICHRA Agent | SC Upstate”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 5 H1 headlines

    There are 5 <h1> headlines (“Adam Fields”, “64 & Under” and “65 & Older”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (161 characters)

    Your meta description is 161 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at http://adam-fields.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at adam-fields.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • Only 2 internal links

    The homepage links to only 2 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

1 checks passed
  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (495 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 7893
  • 12 small tap targets

    12 of 17 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Does not redirect HTTP traffic to HTTPS

    Does not redirect HTTP traffic to HTTPS.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

2 to fix50
  • No HTTPS

    Your homepage is served without HTTPS, so browsers mark it “Not secure” and some refuse forms on it.

  • http:// does not redirect

    http://adam-fields.com does not redirect to https, so some visitors land on the insecure version.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

1 checks passed
  • All 3 links work

    All 3 links checked from your homepage (2 internal, 1 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    adam-fields.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    adam-fields.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 17 years old

    17 years

    adam-fields.com was registered in Jun 2009 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Jun 2027

    adam-fields.com is registered until Jun 2027.

Content and conversion

3 to fix38
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 434 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 434 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Download Free Report”.

Email authentication

3 to fix0
  • No DMARC policy

    adam-fields.com has no DMARC record, so nothing tells receivers what to do with mail that fails SPF or DKIM. Gmail and Yahoo require DMARC from bulk senders.

  • No SPF record

    adam-fields.com has no SPF record, so mail servers can't tell which servers may send email as you. Your mail lands in spam more often, and anyone can send mail pretending to be you.

  • No DKIM key on the usual selectors

    We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.

  • Email authentication score: 0/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 2 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Hosting
GoDaddy

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 27 issues on adam-fields.com, including 3 speed issues, 9 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25