Website review, no card needed
adamed.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202646 issues · 106 checks
This review found 46 issues worth fixing on adamed.com, 20 of them high impact, across 106 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
72CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 101 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 101 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 102 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 102 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 100 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.7 s
1.4 s
2.1 s
2.8 s
3.5 s
4.2 s
4.9 s
5.6 s
adamed.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Improve image delivery
8.0 s · 2.8 MB13 images could be 2.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 8.0 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.7 s · 910 KiBAbout 910 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.7 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
3.0 s8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.0 s.
Reduce unused CSS
1.8 s · 156 KiBAbout 156 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.
Font display
1.6 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.6 s).
Mobile performance score: 24
24/100Your mobile performance score is 24 (desktop: 46). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and Optanon and others), adding 1.8 MB and 827 ms of main-thread time.
YouTube adds 428 ms
428 msYouTube costs a phone 428 ms of main-thread work and 1.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
350 ms · 54 KiB3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (54 KiB).
Google Tag Manager adds 331 ms
331 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 331 ms of main-thread work and 455 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.9 s
A phone's processor spends 2.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
11 long tasks on the main thread
11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 163 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
18 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 18 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 351 ms
351 msYour server sent the HTML in 351 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 33.4 s
33.4 sYour largest element takes 33.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 33.9 s
33.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 33.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 1.008
1.008The layout shifts by 1.008 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Speed Index: 10.8 s
10.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.0 s
4.0 sThe first text or image appears after 4.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 382 ms
382 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 382 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
13 images without width and height
13 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 101 ms to 100 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 109 ms
109 msReal visitors wait 109 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 536 ms
536 msReal visitors wait 536 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.4 MB in 98 requests
6.4 MBYour homepage downloads 6.4 MB in 98 requests on a phone: images 3.7 MB (48), scripts 1.7 MB (20) and fonts 581 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
10 images in older formats
10 images (1.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
8 images below the first screen load straight away
8 images further down the page (1.0 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
6 images far larger than shown
484 KiB6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 1507957 at 870 px wide, shown at 99 px. Resized copies would save about 484 KiB.
About 1.8 g of CO₂ per visit
1.82 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.82 g of CO₂e: 218.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
3 text elements with low contrast
3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
24 images without alt text
24 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
6 form fields without a label
6 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
3 links without text
3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
1 checks passed
50 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.adamed.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
121 internal links, 16 external
The homepage links to 121 pages on adamed.com and 16 external pages.
4 checks passed
Meta description: 152 characters
Your meta description is 152 characters: “Adamed to polska firma farmaceutyczno-biotechnologiczna z 40-letnim doświadczeniem, która powstała na bazie polskiej my…”.
Title: 54 characters
Your title is a healthy 54 characters: “Adamed – tu polska innowacja ma swój początek | Adamed”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.adamed.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (803 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
6 pages share a title
/produkty, /leki-na-recepte, /leki-bez-recepty, /suplementy-diety, /dermokosmetyki and /wyroby-medyczne all use the title “Produkty | Adamed”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
1 page without a meta description
/aktualnosci has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
10 pages share a meta description
/firma-adamed/rada-nadzorcza-adamed-pharma-s-a, /firma-adamed/misja-i-wartosci, /adamed-dla-rodziny and /etyka-i-compliance use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
5 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 5 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example /leki-na-recepte, whose canonical is /produkty. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
8 pages without an H1
/adamed-dla-rodziny, /aktualnosci, /produkty, /leki-na-recepte, /leki-bez-recepty and /suplementy-diety and 2 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 54 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
8 small tap targets
8 of 24 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Connecting to 'https://www.google.com/rmkt/collect/647020454/?random=1792531531883&cv=11&fst=1792531531883&fmt=8&bg=fff…”.
Pasting is blocked
A form field blocks pasting, which frustrates password managers and people on phones.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
Short HSTS lifetime
HSTS is set, but max-age is 7 days; one year is the recommended minimum.
5 links through redirect chains
5 links go through two or more redirects, for example https://www.adamed.com/en/.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
7 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (adamed.com).
Valid certificate (165 days left)
The certificate from GoGetSSL · GoGetSSL RSA DV CA verifies for adamed.com and is valid for another 165 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
http:// redirects to https
http://adamed.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 53 links work
All 53 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 13 external) answered without errors; 1 did not answer within 5 s.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
adamed.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
adamed.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 25 years old
25 yearsadamed.com was registered in Oct 2000 through eNom, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Oct 2029
adamed.com is registered until Oct 2029.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 511 words of copy
The homepage carries about 511 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be adamed.com is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.
Email authentication score: 75/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 mx a ip4:195.74.92.124 ip4:195.74.92.134 ip4:195.74.92.224 ip4:195.74.92.234 ip4:195.74.92.64 ip4:195.74.92.65 a…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
5 cookies set on arrival
5Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
13 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 13 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2024.
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This free review found 46 issues on adamed.com, including 18 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.