Website review, no card needed

affirm.com logo

affirm.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 October 202634 issues · 96 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on affirm.com, 17 of them high impact, across 96 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.2 s2.9 sApr 18Oct 33.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20263.2 s
Apr 25, 20263.1 s
May 2, 20263.1 s
May 9, 20263.0 s
May 16, 20262.9 s
May 23, 20262.9 s
May 30, 20263.0 s
Jun 6, 20263.0 s
Jun 13, 20263.0 s
Jun 20, 20263.0 s
Jun 27, 20263.0 s
Jul 4, 20263.0 s
Jul 11, 20263.1 s
Jul 18, 20263.1 s
Jul 25, 20263.1 s
Aug 1, 20263.1 s
Aug 8, 20263.1 s
Aug 15, 20263.0 s
Aug 22, 20263.0 s
Aug 29, 20263.0 s
Sep 5, 20263.0 s
Sep 12, 20263.0 s
Sep 19, 20263.0 s
Sep 26, 20263.0 s
Oct 3, 20263.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
312 ms180 msApr 18Oct 3262 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026205 ms
Apr 25, 2026205 ms
May 2, 2026203 ms
May 9, 2026197 ms
May 16, 2026195 ms
May 23, 2026208 ms
May 30, 2026228 ms
Jun 6, 2026251 ms
Jun 13, 2026274 ms
Jun 20, 2026285 ms
Jun 27, 2026285 ms
Jul 4, 2026286 ms
Jul 11, 2026287 ms
Jul 18, 2026286 ms
Jul 25, 2026287 ms
Aug 1, 2026288 ms
Aug 8, 2026296 ms
Aug 15, 2026297 ms
Aug 22, 2026296 ms
Aug 29, 2026287 ms
Sep 5, 2026278 ms
Sep 12, 2026271 ms
Sep 19, 2026268 ms
Sep 26, 2026263 ms
Oct 3, 2026262 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of affirm.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. affirm.com at 1.0 s1.0 s
  2. affirm.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  3. affirm.com at 3.1 s3.1 s
  4. affirm.com at 4.1 s4.1 s
  5. affirm.com at 5.1 s5.1 s
  6. affirm.com at 6.1 s6.1 s
  7. affirm.com at 7.1 s7.1 s
  8. affirm.com at 8.2 s8.2 s

affirm.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

8 to fix6
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.1 s · 796 KiB

    About 796 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 1.6 s of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 10.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 10.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 7.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 6

    6/100

    Your mobile performance score is 6. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Optanon and Cloudflare and others), adding 4.2 MB and 1.7 s of main-thread time.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 398 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 30 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 30 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • ctfassets.net adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    ctfassets.net costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 2.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    150 ms

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 150 ms.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    130 KiB

    About 130 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    91 KiB

    6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (91 KiB).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 12 ms

    12 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 12 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 1.42

    1.42

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 1.42 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 15.1 s

    15.1 s

    Your largest element takes 15.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Flexible plans for every purchase”.

  • Time to Interactive: 26.1 s

    26.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 26.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 1.1

    1.1

    The layout shifts by 1.1 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 3.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 11.8 s

    11.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 11.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Real visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 28% slower for real visitors

    +28%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 205 ms to 262 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 132 ms

    132 ms

    Real visitors wait 132 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 329 ms

    329 ms

    Real visitors wait 329 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 6.8 MB in 89 requests

    6.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.8 MB in 89 requests on a phone: media 2.7 MB (1), scripts 2.0 MB (26) and other files 1.6 MB (32). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (37 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.93 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.93 g of CO₂e: 231.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

1 to fixGoogle 9798
  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 47 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 1 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 9276
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (181 characters)

    Your meta description is 181 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 2 links with vague text

    2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 69 internal links, 12 external

    The homepage links to 69 pages on affirm.com and 12 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Title: 62 characters

    Your title is a healthy 62 characters: “Affirm | Pay over time with flexible payment plans and no fees”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.affirm.com/sitemap-index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (584 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix62
  • 15 pages without a title

    /business, /how-it-works, /card, /how-it-works/why-affirm, /download and /shopping/browser-extension and 9 others have no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    /shopping/browser-extension is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    /wallet/where-you-can-pay has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 pages without an H1

    /business, /how-it-works, /card, /how-it-works/why-affirm, /download and /shopping/browser-extension and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 41 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

2 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9678
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://id.rlcdn.com/464526.gif.

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 403 ()”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    11 of 12 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix94
  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • 2 links through redirect chains

    2 links go through two or more redirects, for example https://www.affirm.com/help/.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (affirm.com).

  • Valid certificate (85 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for affirm.com and is valid for another 85 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://affirm.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 51 links work

    All 51 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 11 external) answered without errors; 1 did not answer within 5 s.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    affirm.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    affirm.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 26 years old

    26 years

    affirm.com was registered in Dec 1999 through MarkMonitor Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Dec 2027

    affirm.com is registered until Dec 2027.

Content and conversion

1 to fix90
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 591 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 591 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn more”.

  • 6 calls to action

    The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Shop”, “Sign up” and “Download the App”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 testimonial or review blocks and 7 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Email authentication

85
  • Email authentication score: 85/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:%{i}._ip.%{h}._ehlo.%{d}._spf.vali.email ~all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “k1” and “k2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 7 trackers load before any consent

    7

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 27 cookies set on arrival

    27

    Opening the homepage sets 27 cookies, 3 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 47 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 47 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 34 issues on affirm.com, including 18 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25