Website review, no card needed
agb.org website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202643 issues · 108 checks
This review found 43 issues worth fixing on agb.org, 18 of them high impact, across 108 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
72C- #62,277 of 81,078 reviewed websitesbeats 20%
- #33,828 of 40,017 online storesbeats 13%
- #1,394 of 2,107 WooCommerce storesbeats 29%
Closest competitors among WooCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 183 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 204 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 234 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 254 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 231 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 234 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 249 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 240 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 263 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 273 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 282 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 273 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 267 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 247 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 221 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 189 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 149 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
6.4 s · 1.4 MB8 images could be 1.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.4 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
5.8 s · 748 KiBAbout 748 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.8 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
3.9 s41 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.9 s.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.7 s · 315 KiB17 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (315 KiB).
3,829 HTML elements
The page has 3,829 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Olark, Google Tag Manager and Google CDN and others), adding 1.7 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 50
50/100Your mobile performance score is 50 (desktop: 47). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused CSS
750 ms · 216 KiBAbout 216 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
Google CDN adds 271 ms
271 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 271 ms of main-thread work and 733 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 3.3 s
A phone's processor spends 3.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Olark adds 280 ms
280 msOlark costs a phone 280 ms of main-thread work and 468 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 273 ms
273 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 273 ms of main-thread work and 372 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
14 long tasks on the main thread
14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 164 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 12 KiB12 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Minify CSS
9 KiB9 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 10 ms
10 msYour server sent the HTML in 10 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
First Contentful Paint: 14.8 s
14.8 sThe first text or image appears after 14.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 32.2 s
32.2 sYour largest element takes 32.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 32.3 s
32.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 32.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 14.8 s
14.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 14.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Total Blocking Time: 256 ms
256 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 256 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
3 images without width and height
3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
6 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 601 ms
601 msReal visitors wait 601 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 23% faster for real visitors
-23%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 183 ms to 149 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 20% faster for real visitors
-20%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 2.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.8 MB in 160 requests
5.8 MBYour homepage downloads 5.8 MB in 160 requests on a phone: images 2.7 MB (24), scripts 1.9 MB (63) and other files 394 KiB (21). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image in older formats
1 image (71 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit
1.64 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.64 g of CO₂e: 197.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
8 text elements with low contrast
8 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
4 tap targets too small
4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
4 images without alt text
4 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (12 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
27 links without text
27 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h5 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
47 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 8 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (14 characters)
Your title is only 14 characters: “AGB Home - AGB”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
7 H1 headlines
There are 7 <h1> headlines (“The Decisions Boards Make Today Shape Higher Educ…”, “NAVIGATE CHALLENGES” and “FIND LEADERS”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Meta description is long (182 characters)
Your meta description is 182 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
518 internal links, 12 external
The homepage links to 518 pages on agb.org and 12 external pages.
5 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://agb.org/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://agb.org/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,925 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page points its canonical at the homepage
/your-agb-resource-library declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.
2 pages share a title
/ and /your-agb-resource-library all use the title “AGB Home - AGB”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
3 pages without a meta description
/knowledge-center/trending-topics, /knowledge-center/trending-topics/admissions and /knowledge-center/trending-topics/crisis-leadership have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
4 pages without an H1
/AGB-board-bot, /governing-for-the-future, /governnow and /advocacy/govern-with-integrity have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 152 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://agb.org/.
7 small tap targets
7 of 24 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
Short HSTS lifetime
HSTS is set, but max-age is 0 days; one year is the recommended minimum.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
5 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (agb.org).
Valid certificate (83 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR1 verifies for agb.org and is valid for another 83 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://agb.org redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 47 links work
All 47 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 7 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
agb.org has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
agb.org's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 30 years old
30 yearsagb.org was registered in Aug 1996 through Network Solutions, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Jul 2031
agb.org is registered until Jul 2031.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
A 27-field form
Your longest form asks for 27 fields (11 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 681 words of copy
The homepage carries about 681 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn More →”.
23 calls to action
The homepage has 23 calls to action, for example “Get Started”, “Join AGB” and “Contact Us”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and HubSpot.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 100/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 mx ip4:69.63.150.0/23 ip4:206.112.84.117 ip4:216.32.180.112 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_phishspf…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and HubSpot and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
23 cookies set on arrival
23Opening the homepage sets 23 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
28 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 28 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner
A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
- It runs WordPress 3.7.1; the current release is 7.1.3.
- 3 plugins are behind their latest release.woocommerce 10.9.4 → 11.2.1 · contact-form-7 6.1.6 → 6.2.2 · duracelltomi-google-tag-manager 1.22.4 → 2.0.6
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress 3.7.1
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- WooCommerce
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Company
- Founded
- 1921
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This free review found 43 issues on agb.org, including 20 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.