Website review, no card needed

agongym.com logo

agongym.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202625 issues · 79 checks

This review found 25 issues worth fixing on agongym.com, 5 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: main-thread work: 4.4 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
856 ms633 msMay 23Nov 7679 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 2026830 ms
May 30, 2026742 ms
Jun 6, 2026687 ms
Jun 13, 2026659 ms
Jun 20, 2026662 ms
Jun 27, 2026692 ms
Jul 4, 2026730 ms
Jul 11, 2026757 ms
Jul 18, 2026763 ms
Jul 25, 2026768 ms
Aug 1, 2026763 ms
Aug 8, 2026769 ms
Aug 15, 2026755 ms
Aug 22, 2026761 ms
Aug 29, 2026766 ms
Sep 5, 2026761 ms
Sep 12, 2026764 ms
Sep 19, 2026749 ms
Sep 26, 2026738 ms
Oct 3, 2026705 ms
Oct 10, 2026684 ms
Oct 17, 2026669 ms
Oct 24, 2026663 ms
Oct 31, 2026665 ms
Nov 7, 2026679 ms
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
104 ms84 msMay 23Nov 7100 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 202694 ms
May 30, 202691 ms
Jun 6, 202687 ms
Jun 13, 202687 ms
Jun 20, 202686 ms
Jun 27, 202687 ms
Jul 4, 202689 ms
Jul 11, 202692 ms
Jul 18, 202692 ms
Jul 25, 202693 ms
Aug 1, 202693 ms
Aug 8, 202694 ms
Aug 15, 202695 ms
Aug 22, 202697 ms
Aug 29, 2026100 ms
Sep 5, 2026102 ms
Sep 12, 2026101 ms
Sep 19, 2026100 ms
Sep 26, 202699 ms
Oct 3, 202696 ms
Oct 10, 202695 ms
Oct 17, 202693 ms
Oct 24, 202693 ms
Oct 31, 202696 ms
Nov 7, 2026100 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of agongym.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. agongym.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. agongym.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. agongym.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. agongym.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. agongym.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. agongym.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. agongym.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. agongym.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

6 to fix87
  • Main-thread work: 4.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 766 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 87

    87/100

    Your mobile performance score is 87. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Render-blocking requests

    750 ms

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 750 ms.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 505 KiB

    About 505 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 1,972 HTML elements

    The page has 1,972 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Shopify adds 91 ms

    91 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 91 ms of main-thread work and 380 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Klarna, Klaviyo and Shopify and others), adding 865 KiB and 352 ms of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 97 KiB

    6 images could be 97 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 36 KiB

    About 36 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 115 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    66 KiB

    9 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (66 KiB).

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    28 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 28 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    11 KiB

    11 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 9 ms

    9 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 9 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

3 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 10.5 s

    10.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 10.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    Your largest element takes 3.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 94 ms to 100 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

10 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 0.7 s

    0.7 s

    Real visitors wait 0.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 100 ms

    100 ms

    Real visitors wait 100 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.6 s

    0.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 255 ms

    255 ms

    Real visitors wait 255 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 15% faster for real visitors

    -15%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.8 s to 0.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Speed Index: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 3.1 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 57 ms

    57 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 57 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.3 MB in 215 requests

    2.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.3 MB in 215 requests on a phone: scripts 996 KiB (69), other files 804 KiB (113) and images 442 KiB (20). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (103 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.66 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.66 g of CO₂e: 79.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9796
  • 12 text elements with low contrast

    12 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (1 element)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 120 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 3 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 10088
  • Title is short (20 characters)

    Your title is only 20 characters: “AGONGYM : Sportswear”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • Meta description is long (184 characters)

    Your meta description is 184 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 199 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 199 pages on agongym.com and 6 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “AGONGYM”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://agongym.com/en.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://agongym.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (762 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

4 to fix81
  • 6 pages share 2 titles

    /en/products/hoodie-limitless-black-white, /en/products/hoodie-limitless-black-mustard, /en/products/hoodie-limitless-camel-dark-brown and /en/products/pullover-limitless-camel-dark-brown all use the title “BB TEAM HOODIE - BLACK”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 4 pages without a meta description

    /en/collections/black-month, /en/collections/lifting-culture, /en/collections/training-club-1 and /en/collections/liquidacion have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 8 pages share a meta description

    /en/products/hoodie-limitless-black-white, /en/products/hoodie-limitless-black-mustard, /en/products/hoodie-limitless-camel-dark-brown and /en/products/pullover-limitless-camel-dark-brown use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 4 pages without an H1

    /en/collections/black-month, /en/collections/lifting-culture, /en/collections/training-club-1 and /en/collections/liquidacion have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 49 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 31 small tap targets

    31 of 57 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 598 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 598 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “CONTACT” and “Subscribe”.

  • 6 short forms

    6 short forms (6 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 13 cookies set on arrival

    13

    Opening the homepage sets 13 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 27 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 27 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at agongym.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 8 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Instafeed · Hulk Form Builder · Revoq Eu Withdrawal Button · Aftersell · Forms · webgains.com · amazonaws.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Bootstrap
E-commerce
Shopify
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 25 issues on agongym.com, including 9 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25