Website review, no card needed

ahava.com logo

ahava.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202643 issues · 111 checks

This review found 43 issues worth fixing on ahava.com, 15 of them high impact, across 111 checks. The most urgent: main-thread work: 13.7 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.9 s1.8 sApr 25Oct 101.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 20262.5 s
May 2, 20262.5 s
May 9, 20262.5 s
May 16, 20262.5 s
May 23, 20262.5 s
May 30, 20262.7 s
Jun 6, 20262.7 s
Jun 13, 20262.8 s
Jun 20, 20262.8 s
Jun 27, 20262.7 s
Jul 4, 20262.6 s
Jul 11, 20262.6 s
Jul 18, 20262.6 s
Jul 25, 20262.5 s
Aug 1, 20262.5 s
Aug 8, 20262.5 s
Aug 15, 20262.4 s
Aug 22, 20262.4 s
Aug 29, 20262.4 s
Sep 5, 20262.4 s
Sep 12, 20262.4 s
Sep 19, 20262.3 s
Sep 26, 20262.2 s
Oct 3, 20262.0 s
Oct 10, 20261.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
194 ms131 msApr 25Oct 10187 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 25, 2026138 ms
May 2, 2026139 ms
May 9, 2026143 ms
May 16, 2026145 ms
May 23, 2026155 ms
May 30, 2026170 ms
Jun 6, 2026178 ms
Jun 13, 2026186 ms
Jun 20, 2026182 ms
Jun 27, 2026180 ms
Jul 4, 2026179 ms
Jul 11, 2026175 ms
Jul 18, 2026170 ms
Jul 25, 2026171 ms
Aug 1, 2026172 ms
Aug 8, 2026176 ms
Aug 15, 2026179 ms
Aug 22, 2026170 ms
Aug 29, 2026167 ms
Sep 5, 2026166 ms
Sep 12, 2026169 ms
Sep 19, 2026176 ms
Sep 26, 2026177 ms
Oct 3, 2026182 ms
Oct 10, 2026187 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of ahava.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. ahava.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  2. ahava.com at 2.9 s2.9 s
  3. ahava.com at 4.4 s4.4 s
  4. ahava.com at 5.9 s5.9 s
  5. ahava.com at 7.4 s7.4 s
  6. ahava.com at 8.8 s8.8 s
  7. ahava.com at 10.3 s10.3 s
  8. ahava.com at 11.8 s11.8 s

ahava.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

13 to fix36
  • Main-thread work: 13.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 13.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 7.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 36

    36/100

    Your mobile performance score is 36 (desktop: 55). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 7,172 HTML elements

    The page has 7,172 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Other Google APIs/SDKs, Google Tag Manager and osano.com and others), adding 2.7 MB and 2.2 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    947 KiB

    About 947 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Render-blocking requests

    700 ms

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 700 ms.

  • Other Google APIs/SDKs adds 515 ms

    515 ms

    Other Google APIs/SDKs costs a phone 515 ms of main-thread work and 940 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 448 ms

    448 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 448 ms of main-thread work and 336 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    409 KiB

    28 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (409 KiB).

  • Yotpo adds 327 ms

    327 ms

    Yotpo costs a phone 327 ms of main-thread work and 468 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 369 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • osano.com adds 353 ms

    353 ms

    osano.com costs a phone 353 ms of main-thread work and 92 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Klaviyo adds 203 ms

    203 ms

    Klaviyo costs a phone 203 ms of main-thread work and 336 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    55 KiB

    3 images could be 55 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    55 KiB

    About 55 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    18 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 18 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify JavaScript

    17 KiB

    17 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 24 ms

    24 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 24 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Speed Index: 17.2 s

    17.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 17.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 28.6 s

    28.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 28.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 6.3 s

    6.3 s

    Your largest element takes 6.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.7 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 33% slower for real visitors

    +33%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 138 ms to 187 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 923 ms

    923 ms

    Real visitors wait 923 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 196 ms

    196 ms

    Real visitors wait 196 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 21% faster for real visitors

    -21%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.005

    0.005

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.005, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 4.5 MB in 368 requests

    4.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.5 MB in 368 requests on a phone: scripts 2.7 MB (126), other files 866 KiB (172) and fonts 350 KiB (14). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (35 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.28 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.28 g of CO₂e: 153.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 8487
  • Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (1 element)

    Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 14 images without alt text

    14 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (10 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 6 links without text

    6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).

1 checks passed
  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 8593
  • 3 H1 headlines

    There are 3 <h1> headlines (“#sticky-header-content .logo-normal, #sticky-head…”, “30% OFF $100+ 40% OFF $200+” and “ABOUT AHAVA”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 4 links with vague text

    4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 249 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 249 pages on ahava.com and 9 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 152 characters

    Your meta description is 152 characters: “Shop AHAVA for Dead Sea skin care products. 100% vegan, natural mineral formulas. Sustainably crafted for visible resul…”.

  • Title: 57 characters

    Your title is a healthy 57 characters: “Dead Sea Skin Care Products | Vegan & Natural – AHAVA USA”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.ahava.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: OnlineStore, Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.ahava.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,236 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 1 page without a meta description

    /pages/sms has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    /pages/find-your-product and /pages/rewards have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 96 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 7770
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.ahava.com/.

  • 19 small tap targets

    19 of 58 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “show_more is not defined”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix93
  • 1 broken external link

    1 link to other sites is dead, for example https://ahavacom.aftership.com/ (404).

  • Short HSTS lifetime

    HSTS is set, but max-age is 91 days; one year is the recommended minimum.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

6 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (ahava.com).

  • Valid certificate (76 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE1 verifies for ahava.com and is valid for another 76 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://ahava.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

Domain and trust

  • DNSSEC is off

    ahava.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

3 checks passed
  • Domain is 31 years old

    31 years

    ahava.com was registered in May 1995 through Domain The Net Technologies Ltd.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Certificate issuers are restricted

    CAA records allow only ssl.com, digicert.com, letsencrypt.org and globalsign.com to issue certificates for ahava.com, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.

  • Registered until May 2027

    ahava.com is registered until May 2027.

Content and conversion

2 to fix83
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 34 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 523 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 523 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “JOIN” and “Shop Best Step”.

  • 23 calls to action

    The homepage has 23 calls to action, for example “JOIN”, “Shop by price” and “Shop under $100”.

  • 36 short forms

    36 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity.

Email authentication

100
  • Email authentication score: 100/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 ip4:31.133.101.0/24 a include:spf.protection.outlook.com ip4:82.80.37.174 include:one.zoho.com include:mailgun.o…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 9 trackers load before any consent

    9

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Osano) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 33 cookies set on arrival

    33

    Opening the homepage sets 33 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 55 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 55 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Osano

    A consent management tool (Osano) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Tailwind CSS
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity

Company

Founded
1988
Headquarters
Holon

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 43 issues on ahava.com, including 22 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25