Website review, no card needed
akrapovic.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202649 issues · 106 checks
This review found 49 issues worth fixing on akrapovic.com, 10 of them high impact, across 106 checks. The most urgent: font display. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
72CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 5.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 4.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 153 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 148 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 130 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Font display
3.0 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 3.0 s).
Use efficient cache lifetimes
750 ms · 11.6 MB82 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (11.6 MB).
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Azure Web Services and YouTube and others), adding 12.4 MB and 236 ms of main-thread time.
Azure Web Services adds 0 ms
0 msAzure Web Services costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 11.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 72
72/100Your mobile performance score is 72. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Improve image delivery
820 KiB19 images could be 820 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Reduce unused JavaScript
343 KiBAbout 343 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Google Tag Manager adds 236 ms
236 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 236 ms of main-thread work and 295 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.2 s
A phone's processor spends 2.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 839 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
5 long tasks on the main thread
5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 170 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Document request latency
102 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Reduce unused CSS
54 KiBAbout 54 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 327 ms
327 msYour server sent the HTML in 327 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user TTFB: 2.4 s
2.4 sReal visitors wait 2.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Speed Index: 12.6 s
12.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 17.5 s
17.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 17.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.8 s
3.8 sReal visitors wait 3.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.21
0.21For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.21 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 2.7 s
2.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 3.9 s
3.9 sYour largest element takes 3.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s.
18 images without width and height
18 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.107
0.107The layout shifts by 0.107 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
5 checks passed
Real-user INP: 137 ms
137 msReal visitors wait 137 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 13% faster for real visitors
-13%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 153 ms to 130 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 19% faster for real visitors
-19%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.4 s to 4.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s
1.7 sThe first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Total Blocking Time: 185 ms
185 msScripts block the page for only 185 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 14.2 MB in 94 requests
14.2 MBYour homepage downloads 14.2 MB in 94 requests on a phone: media 9.8 MB (6), images 2.3 MB (68) and scripts 985 KiB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
5 images far larger than shown
529 KiB5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example DYNO_Ducati_FINAL.jpg at 1,170 px wide, shown at 357 px. Resized copies would save about 529 KiB.
10 images in older formats
10 images (1.1 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
13 images below the first screen load straight away
13 images further down the page (1,000 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 4.0 g of CO₂ per visit
4.03 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.03 g of CO₂e: 483.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
11 text elements with low contrast
11 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (2 elements)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
21 images without alt text
21 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (17 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 17 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
1 checks passed
23 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 30 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 23 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is short (64 characters)
Your meta description is only 64 characters: “Akrapovič | World Championship-Winning Exhaust System Technology”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
5 H1 headlines
There are 5 <h1> headlines (“WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP-WINNINGEXHAUST SYSTEM TECHNOLO…”, “PARTNER TO PRESTIGIOUS AUTOMOTIVE AND MOTORCYCLE …” and “WHAT IS UNIQUE ABOUT AKRAPOVIČ?”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://akrapovic.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
12 links crawlers can't follow
12 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
3 links with vague text
3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
67 internal links, 27 external
The homepage links to 67 pages on akrapovic.com and 27 external pages.
2 checks passed
Title: 64 characters
Your title is a healthy 64 characters: “Akrapovič | World Championship-Winning Exhaust System Technology”.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (493 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
3 pages share a title
/, /en/akrapovic-collection and /en all use the title “Akrapovič | World Championship-Winning Exhaust System Technology”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
14 pages share a meta description
/en/racing-service/motorcycle, /en/technology, /en/akrapovic-collection, /en/multimedia/videos, /en/cookie-policy and /en/privacy-policy and 8 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
5 pages slow to respond
/en/racing-service/motorcycle, /en/technology, /en/akrapovic-collection, /en/multimedia and /en/multimedia/lifestyle-magazine took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 32 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
5 small tap targets
5 of 25 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HTTP/1.1 only
The server only offers HTTP/1.1, so browsers open several connections and load files more slowly. Most hosts and CDNs turn on HTTP/2 with a setting.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
4 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (akrapovic.com).
Valid certificate (60 days left)
The certificate from DigiCert Inc · Thawte TLS RSA CA G1 verifies for akrapovic.com and is valid for another 60 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://akrapovic.com redirects to the secure version.
All 50 links work
All 50 links checked from your homepage (33 internal, 17 external) answered without errors; 11 did not answer within 5 s.
Domain and trust
4 checks passed
Domain is 25 years old
25 yearsakrapovic.com was registered in Aug 2001 through CSL Computer Service Langenbach GmbH d/b/a joker.com. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Certificate issuers are restricted
CAA records allow only digicert.com, rapidssl.com and letsencrypt.org to issue certificates for akrapovic.com, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.
DNSSEC is on
akrapovic.com's DNS answers are signed (DNSSEC), so they can't be forged on the way to visitors.
Registered until Aug 2035
akrapovic.com is registered until Aug 2035.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 14 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 268 words of copy
The homepage carries about 268 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “WHERE TO BUY” and “Contact & media”.
6 calls to action
The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Where to buy”, “Contact & media” and “Contact us”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 90/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 ip4:89.143.198.134 ip4:89.143.246.8 ip4:167.89.90.49 ip4:213.250.31.65 include:sendgrid.net include:spf.protecti…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “selector2” and “s1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
4 cookies set on arrival
4Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
5 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Angular
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Azure
Company
- Founded
- 1990
- Headquarters
- Municipality of Ivančna Gorica
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 49 issues on akrapovic.com, including 19 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.