albeco.com.pl website review

49 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.4 MB).

About 466 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.

3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.0 s.

About 139 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

Your mobile performance score is 60 (desktop: 76). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

9 images could be 391 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

Google Tag Manager costs a phone 238 ms of main-thread work and 321 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 263 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare and ahrefs.com and others), adding 413 KiB and 248 ms of main-thread time.

Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

Polyfills for old browsers add 24 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

Your largest element takes 12.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Łożyska izolowane NKE SQ77 – ochrona napędów.”.

The page becomes fully interactive after 12.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

The first text or image appears after 3.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

Real visitors wait 253 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

Real visitors wait 950 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Visually, the page fills in at 5.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

Scripts block taps and scrolling for 256 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

11 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 149 ms to 162 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.2 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Your homepage downloads 2.8 MB in 60 requests on a phone: images 1.6 MB (40), scripts 763 KiB (6) and fonts 276 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

5 images (221 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.78 g of CO₂e: 93.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

All page content should be contained by landmarks: 36 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

23 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

Your title is 105 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Albeco - Bearings, linear motion, telescopic slides,technical chemicals, maintenance tool…”.

No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Top quality” and “the widest range of products”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

Your meta description is 203 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

No XML sitemap at https://www.albeco.com.pl/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

5 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

The homepage links to 151 pages on albeco.com.pl and 3 external pages.

There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

Your homepage links to /en/strona/kontakt-247, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.

/en and /en/newsletter all use the title “Albeco - Bearings, linear motion, telescopic slides,technical chemica…”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

/en/page/knowledge and /en/newsletter have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

/en/page/knowledge and /en/pages/manufacturers have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 82 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

25 of 61 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

Large scripts ship without source maps.

Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

Your longest form asks for 28 fields (0 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

The homepage carries about 694 words of visible text.

Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.