Website review, no card needed

alcon.com logo

alcon.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202635 issues · 103 checks

This review found 35 issues worth fixing on alcon.com, 14 of them high impact, across 103 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.4 s1.4 sApr 25Oct 101.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 20262.3 s
May 2, 20261.8 s
May 9, 20261.8 s
May 16, 20261.8 s
May 23, 20261.7 s
May 30, 20261.5 s
Jun 6, 20261.5 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.6 s
Jun 27, 20261.7 s
Jul 4, 20261.8 s
Jul 11, 20261.8 s
Jul 18, 20261.7 s
Jul 25, 20261.7 s
Aug 1, 20261.7 s
Aug 8, 20261.7 s
Aug 15, 20261.7 s
Aug 22, 20261.7 s
Aug 29, 20261.7 s
Sep 5, 20261.7 s
Sep 12, 20261.8 s
Sep 19, 20261.8 s
Sep 26, 20261.8 s
Oct 3, 20261.8 s
Oct 10, 20261.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
109 ms102 msApr 25Oct 10103 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 25, 2026107 ms
May 2, 2026106 ms
May 9, 2026108 ms
May 16, 2026108 ms
May 23, 2026108 ms
May 30, 2026107 ms
Jun 6, 2026107 ms
Jun 13, 2026107 ms
Jun 20, 2026107 ms
Jun 27, 2026107 ms
Jul 4, 2026107 ms
Jul 11, 2026106 ms
Jul 18, 2026106 ms
Jul 25, 2026106 ms
Aug 1, 2026105 ms
Aug 8, 2026104 ms
Aug 15, 2026104 ms
Aug 22, 2026103 ms
Aug 29, 2026105 ms
Sep 5, 2026105 ms
Sep 12, 2026105 ms
Sep 19, 2026105 ms
Sep 26, 2026103 ms
Oct 3, 2026104 ms
Oct 10, 2026103 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of alcon.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. alcon.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. alcon.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. alcon.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. alcon.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. alcon.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. alcon.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. alcon.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. alcon.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

alcon.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

6 to fix63
  • Improve image delivery

    2.8 s · 1.5 MB

    5 images could be 1.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.4 s · 669 KiB

    136 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (669 KiB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    33 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 63

    63/100

    Your mobile performance score is 63 (desktop: 92). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    600 ms · 119 KiB

    About 119 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 87 KiB

    About 87 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (ustudio.com, Optanon and Tealium and others), adding 398 KiB and 252 ms of main-thread time.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 18 KiB

    18 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 91 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify JavaScript

    20 KiB

    20 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    19 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 19 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 92 but mobile only 63. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 525 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 5 ms

    5 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 11.7 s

    11.7 s

    Your largest element takes 11.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “BRYTLY Redness Reliever Eye Drops”.

  • Time to Interactive: 11.7 s

    11.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 11.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 5.7 s

    5.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 5 images without width and height

    5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 107 ms to 103 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

9 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 104 ms

    104 ms

    Real visitors wait 104 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 751 ms

    751 ms

    Real visitors wait 751 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 11% faster for real visitors

    -11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 33 ms

    33 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 33 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

3 to fix48
  • Page weight: 5.4 MB in 156 requests

    5.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.4 MB in 156 requests on a phone: media 2.9 MB (1), images 1.8 MB (24) and scripts 478 KiB (78). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 1.1 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (948 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (55 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.54 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.54 g of CO₂e: 185.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 8893
  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (1 element)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 11 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 5 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9290
  • Meta description is long (172 characters)

    Your meta description is 172 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 29 internal links, 14 external

    The homepage links to 29 pages on alcon.com and 14 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Brilliant.”.

  • Title: 48 characters

    Your title is a healthy 48 characters: “Alcon: Developing Innovative Eye Care Treatments”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.alcon.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.alcon.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (192 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix83
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    /media-release/fda-approves-alcons-brytly-redness-reliever-eye-drops-12-hours-whiter-brighter is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 3 pages without a meta description

    /alcon-search, /media-release/fda-approves-alcons-brytly-redness-reliever-eye-drops-12-hours-whiter-brighter and /alcon-research-institute have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    /alcon-search, /media-release/fda-approves-alcons-brytly-redness-reliever-eye-drops-12-hours-whiter-brighter and /cookie-notice have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages with very little text

    /alcon-search and /cookie-notice have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 12 internal pages checked

    We fetched 12 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 12 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has a title

    All 12 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 10086
  • Scrolls sideways on phones

    On a 390 px-wide phone the page scrolls sideways, a sign that something is wider than the screen.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    11 of 13 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix86
  • 1 broken link to your own pages

    1 link from your homepage to your own site is broken, for example https://www.alcon.com/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection (404).

  • Short HSTS lifetime

    HSTS is set, but max-age is 30 days; one year is the recommended minimum.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

6 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (alcon.com).

  • Valid certificate (79 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for alcon.com and is valid for another 79 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://alcon.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

Domain and trust

1 to fix
  • Domain expires in 63 days

    alcon.com is registered until Dec 2026. Make sure auto-renew is on and the card on file is current.

  • No CAA record

    alcon.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    alcon.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

1 checks passed
  • Domain is 27 years old

    27 years

    alcon.com was registered in Dec 1998 through MarkMonitor Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

Content and conversion

5 to fix42
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 225 words

    The homepage has only about 225 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

1 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Contact Us”.

Email authentication

1 to fix85
  • SPF does not block other senders (no all)

    Your SPF record doesn't end in -all or ~all, so it doesn't stop other servers sending as you: “v=spf1 redirect=b0f5qc91._spf._d.mim.ec”.

  • Email authentication score: 85/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 13 cookies set on arrival

    13

    Opening the homepage sets 13 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 12 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

2 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

CMS
Drupal 11 (https://www.drupal.org)
Framework
jQuery

Company

Founded
1945

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 35 issues on alcon.com, including 11 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25