Website review, no card needed

aligntech.com logo

aligntech.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202644 issues · 104 checks

This review found 44 issues worth fixing on aligntech.com, 15 of them high impact, across 104 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.2 s2.9 sMay 2Oct 173.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20263.0 s
May 9, 20263.0 s
May 16, 20263.0 s
May 23, 20262.9 s
May 30, 20262.9 s
Jun 6, 20263.0 s
Jun 13, 20263.1 s
Jun 20, 20263.1 s
Jun 27, 20263.1 s
Jul 4, 20263.1 s
Jul 11, 20263.0 s
Jul 18, 20262.9 s
Jul 25, 20262.9 s
Aug 1, 20262.9 s
Aug 8, 20263.0 s
Aug 15, 20263.0 s
Aug 22, 20263.1 s
Aug 29, 20263.1 s
Sep 5, 20263.2 s
Sep 12, 20263.1 s
Sep 19, 20263.1 s
Sep 26, 20263.0 s
Oct 3, 20262.9 s
Oct 10, 20262.9 s
Oct 17, 20263.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
72 ms62 msMay 2Oct 1769 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202664 ms
May 9, 202663 ms
May 16, 202663 ms
May 23, 202664 ms
May 30, 202665 ms
Jun 6, 202666 ms
Jun 13, 202668 ms
Jun 20, 202667 ms
Jun 27, 202669 ms
Jul 4, 202671 ms
Jul 11, 202671 ms
Jul 18, 202671 ms
Jul 25, 202669 ms
Aug 1, 202666 ms
Aug 8, 202668 ms
Aug 15, 202668 ms
Aug 22, 202668 ms
Aug 29, 202666 ms
Sep 5, 202664 ms
Sep 12, 202668 ms
Sep 19, 202667 ms
Sep 26, 202670 ms
Oct 3, 202669 ms
Oct 10, 202664 ms
Oct 17, 202669 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of aligntech.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. aligntech.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. aligntech.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. aligntech.com at 1.4 s1.4 s
  4. aligntech.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  5. aligntech.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  6. aligntech.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  7. aligntech.com at 3.3 s3.3 s
  8. aligntech.com at 3.8 s3.8 s

aligntech.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

6 to fix59
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    12.1 s · 4.4 MB

    25 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (4.4 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    9.7 s · 3.1 MB

    9 images could be 3.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 9.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.5 s · 256 KiB

    About 256 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.2 s

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.2 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 59

    59/100

    Your mobile performance score is 59 (desktop: 80). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 230 ms

    230 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 230 ms of main-thread work and 326 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, userway.org and TrustArc and others), adding 671 KiB and 340 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 31 KiB

    About 31 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 163 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    11 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 11 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Document request latency

    9 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 399 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 30 ms

    30 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 30 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 21.0 s

    21.0 s

    Your largest element takes 21.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Empty heading”.

  • Time to Interactive: 21.2 s

    21.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 21.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.3 s

    7.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    Real visitors wait 3.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 7 images without width and height

    7 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 64 ms to 69 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.0 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 66 ms

    66 ms

    Real visitors wait 66 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 119 ms

    119 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 119 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix53
  • Page weight: 4.9 MB in 53 requests

    4.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.9 MB in 53 requests on a phone: images 4.1 MB (18), scripts 660 KiB (13) and fonts 81 KiB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 7 images in older formats

    7 images (881 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 5 images below the first screen load straight away

    5 images further down the page (499 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.40 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.40 g of CO₂e: 167.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 9588
  • 19 text elements with low contrast

    19 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • <html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)

    <html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 5 images without alt text

    5 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (8 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 5 links without text

    5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • No page language

    The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h4, h1 → h4 and h1 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 8 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

9 to fixGoogle 8360
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is short (16 characters)

    Your title is only 16 characters: “Align Technology”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • 5 H1 headlines

    There are 5 <h1> headlines (“”, “+$4.1B” and “~23.5M”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (Organization) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: missing name”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.aligntech.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • 4 links with vague text

    4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 27 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 27 pages on aligntech.com and 7 external pages.

1 checks passed
  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing name, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (377 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix83
  • 14 pages share a title

    /, /about, /about%23who, /about%23lead, /about%23strat and /about/research_program and 8 others all use the title “Align Technology”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 13 pages without a meta description

    /about, /about%23who, /about%23lead, /about%23strat, /about/research_program and /about/corporate_accountability and 7 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    /solutions, /solutions/invisalign_system and /careers have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    /careers has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 19 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 4 small tap targets

    4 of 8 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix94
  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (aligntech.com).

  • Valid certificate (53 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR1 verifies for aligntech.com and is valid for another 53 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://aligntech.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 28 links work

    All 28 links checked from your homepage (21 internal, 7 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    aligntech.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    aligntech.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 29 years old

    29 years

    aligntech.com was registered in Jul 1997 through CSC Corporate Domains, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Jul 2027

    aligntech.com is registered until Jul 2027.

Content and conversion

3 to fix60
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 357 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 357 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 6 calls to action

    The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Contact us”, “Learn more” and “Data Subject Request”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Email authentication

90
  • Email authentication score: 90/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 a ip4:20.3.87.91 ip4:20.112.51.0/29 ip4:216.34.141.195 ip4:216.34.141.196 ip4:159.135.237.148 include:spf.protec…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “selector2” and “k1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (TrustArc) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 7 cookies set on arrival

    7

    Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 10 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: TrustArc

    A consent management tool (TrustArc) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Heroku

Company

Founded
1997
Headquarters
San Jose

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 44 issues on aligntech.com, including 15 speed issues, 9 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25