Website review, no card needed
amalan.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202619 issues · 68 checks
This review found 19 issues worth fixing on amalan.com, 8 of them high impact, across 68 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Google's speed test didn't respond, so speed is not measured here; your full playbook measures it. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
Not scored yet: Google's speed test didn't run in this review. Re-run the review to get a score.
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 7.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 8.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 9.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 6.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 7.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 11.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 11.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 5.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 4.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 303 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 324 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 338 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 335 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 324 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 322 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 324 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 304 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 297 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 331 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 311 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 382 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 376 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 336 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 390 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 335 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 353 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 341 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 329 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 354 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 345 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 387 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 359 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Not measured in this review.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on your site (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.0 s
4.0 sReal visitors wait 4.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 3.9 s
3.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 3.2 s
3.2 sReal visitors wait 3.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 19% slower for real visitors
+19%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 303 ms to 359 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.6 s to 4.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
1 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Images and page weight
1 image far larger than shown
72 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example Logo-amalan-Hi-Res-01-1.png at 3,508 px wide, shown at 108 px. Resized copies would save about 72 KiB.
2 images in older formats
2 images (286 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit
0.55 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.55 g of CO₂e: 66.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Page weight: 2.0 MB
2.0 MBYour homepage downloads 2.0 MB on a phone, 369 KiB of it images (18%). That is a lean page.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
All page content should be contained by landmarks (24 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 24 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 16 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
27 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 31 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 27 passed and 4 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at blog.amalan.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
81 internal links, 31 external
The homepage links to 81 pages on amalan.com and 31 external pages.
5 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Selesaikan Masalah Utang Anda & Jalani Hidup Lebih Baik”.
Title: 52 characters
Your title is a healthy 52 characters: “Selesaikan Masalah Utang Anda - Solusi Utang Terbaik”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://blog.amalan.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://blog.amalan.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,178 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
Your server turned our page checks away
15 pages we tried to fetch timed out or refused automated requests, so these checks couldn't run. Some firewalls do this to every bot, including search engine crawlers they don't recognise.
Best practices
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Mixed Content: The page at 'https://blog.amalan.com/' was loaded over HTTPS, but requested an insecure font 'http://blo…”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
5 of 5 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
5 insecure resources on an https page
5 resources load over plain http on your https page (for example http://blog.amalan.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Logo-amalan-Hi-Res-01-1.png); browsers block or warn about them.
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
6 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (blog.amalan.com).
Valid certificate (80 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE1 verifies for amalan.com and is valid for another 80 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
http:// redirects to https
http://amalan.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 54 links work
All 54 links checked from your homepage (34 internal, 20 external) answered without errors; 51 did not answer within 5 s.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
amalan.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
amalan.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 10 years old
10 yearsamalan.com was registered in Aug 2016 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Aug 2027
amalan.com is registered until Aug 2027.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 594 words of copy
The homepage carries about 594 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “[email protected]”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 95/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.sendinblue.com include:_spf.odoo.com mx ~all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and TikTok Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
12 cookies set on arrival
12Opening the homepage sets 12 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
24 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 24 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 19 issues on amalan.com, including 4 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.