Website review, no card needed
amohaoma.com.br website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 8 November 202637 issues · 85 checks
This review found 37 issues worth fixing on amohaoma.com.br, 13 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: 9,465 HTML elements. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
73C- #81,018 of 108,868 reviewed websitesbeats 22%
- #50,684 of 61,767 online storesbeats 15%
- #47,531 of 56,365 Shopify storesbeats 13%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 189 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 187 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 206 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 221 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 220 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 219 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 217 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 209 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 224 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 276 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 290 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 292 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 239 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 165 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
9,465 HTML elements
The page has 9,465 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Main-thread work: 8.6 s
A phone's processor spends 8.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 53
53/100Your mobile performance score is 53. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Shopify, engagebud.co and streamshop.com.br and others), adding 1.1 MB and 429 ms of main-thread time.
Render-blocking requests
450 ms2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 450 ms.
Shopify adds 223 ms
223 msShopify costs a phone 223 ms of main-thread work and 578 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
10 long tasks on the main thread
10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 279 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 137 KiB15 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (137 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 43 KiBAbout 43 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
151 KiBAbout 151 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Improve image delivery
134 KiB8 images could be 134 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Minify JavaScript
40 KiB40 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Duplicated JavaScript
5 KiB5 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 23 ms
23 msYour server sent the HTML in 23 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 8.7 s
8.7 sYour largest element takes 8.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 22.8 s
22.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 22.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 8.9 s
8.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user INP: 301 ms
301 msReal visitors wait 301 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 344 ms
344 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 344 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.137
0.137The layout shifts by 0.137 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
6 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.3 s
2.3 sReal visitors wait 2.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 704 ms
704 msReal visitors wait 704 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 11% faster for real visitors
-11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 189 ms to 165 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 20% faster for real visitors
-20%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 1.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 1.5 s
1.5 sThe first text or image appears after 1.5 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.7 MB in 482 requests
5.7 MBYour homepage downloads 5.7 MB in 482 requests on a phone: images 2.7 MB (49), other files 1.2 MB (201) and scripts 986 KiB (193). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
37.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (48 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit
1.61 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.61 g of CO₂e: 193.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
26 text elements with low contrast
26 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (1 element)
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
5 buttons without a name
5 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (29 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 29 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (4 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 71 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 6 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (5 characters)
Your title is only 5 characters: “Haoma”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Meta description is long (194 characters)
Your meta description is 194 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
240 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 240 pages on amohaoma.com.br and 5 external pages.
6 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Haoma”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://haoma.com.br/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: OnlineStore, Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://haoma.com.br/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (790 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://haoma.com.br/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
10 pages without a meta description
https://haoma.com.br/pages/bean-to-bar, https://haoma.com.br/collections/natal, https://haoma.com.br/collections/haoma-protein, https://haoma.com.br/collections/haoma-protein-chocolate-branco-copia, https://haoma.com.br/collections/haoma-protein-chocolate-branco and https://haoma.com.br/collections/nuage-baunilha and 4 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages without an H1
https://haoma.com.br/pages/bean-to-bar and https://haoma.com.br/pages/onde-nos-encontrar have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 82 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://haoma.com.br/.
5 JavaScript errors while loading
5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “ot.replace is not a function https://haoma.com.br/web-pixels/strict/app/web-pixel-1909817507@71c0af22324bc0d4c8ff03e3e6…”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
84 of 93 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 32 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,128 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,128 words of visible text.
1 checks passed
54 short forms
54 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
16 cookies set on arrival
16Opening the homepage sets 16 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
36 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 36 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at amohaoma.com.br, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 7 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Judge Me Reviews · Countdown Timer · influencerbit.com · cart-bot.net · amazonaws.com · cloudfront.net · Swym Wishlist Plus
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 37 issues on amohaoma.com.br, including 16 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.