Website review, no card needed

amscope.co.uk logo

amscope.co.uk website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202623 issues · 59 checks

This review found 23 issues worth fixing on amscope.co.uk, 9 of them high impact, across 59 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Google's speed test didn't respond, so speed is not measured here; your full playbook measures it. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Site score

Not scored yet: Google's speed test didn't run in this review. Re-run the review to get a score.

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.5 s1.7 sMay 23Nov 72.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20263.3 s
May 30, 20263.2 s
Jun 6, 20263.1 s
Jun 13, 20263.2 s
Jun 20, 20263.1 s
Jun 27, 20262.9 s
Jul 4, 20262.7 s
Jul 11, 20262.3 s
Jul 18, 20262.0 s
Jul 25, 20262.0 s
Aug 1, 20262.1 s
Aug 8, 20262.3 s
Aug 15, 20262.3 s
Aug 22, 20262.8 s
Aug 29, 20263.1 s
Sep 5, 20263.2 s
Sep 12, 20263.2 s
Sep 19, 20263.1 s
Sep 26, 20262.7 s
Oct 3, 20262.4 s
Oct 10, 20262.4 s
Oct 17, 20261.9 s
Oct 24, 20261.9 s
Oct 31, 20261.9 s
Nov 7, 20262.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
166 ms123 msMay 23Nov 7135 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026151 ms
May 30, 2026152 ms
Jun 6, 2026148 ms
Jun 13, 2026154 ms
Jun 20, 2026145 ms
Jun 27, 2026138 ms
Jul 4, 2026139 ms
Jul 11, 2026132 ms
Jul 18, 2026131 ms
Jul 25, 2026129 ms
Aug 1, 2026128 ms
Aug 8, 2026129 ms
Aug 15, 2026130 ms
Aug 22, 2026137 ms
Aug 29, 2026149 ms
Sep 5, 2026159 ms
Sep 12, 2026159 ms
Sep 19, 2026161 ms
Sep 26, 2026145 ms
Oct 3, 2026138 ms
Oct 10, 2026141 ms
Oct 17, 2026137 ms
Oct 24, 2026134 ms
Oct 31, 2026131 ms
Nov 7, 2026135 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

No screenshot is available for this review.

Speed

Not measured in this review.

Core Web Vitals

2 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on your site (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.49

    0.49

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.49 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 137 ms

    137 ms

    Real visitors wait 137 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 666 ms

    666 ms

    Real visitors wait 666 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 12% faster for real visitors

    -12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 151 ms to 135 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 41% faster for real visitors

    -41%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.3 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

2 to fix81
  • Page weight: 3.7 MB

    3.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.7 MB on a phone, 499 KiB of it images (13%). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    gift-lab-mobile_9fe9bfa9-f3e3-4e4c-82e5-d57f32be4042_540x.jp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (42 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.04 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.04 g of CO₂e: 125.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

8 to fix89
  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 55 tap targets too small

    55 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 14 images without alt text

    14 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (7 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 12 links without text

    12 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

1 checks passed
  • 52 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 6 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fix74
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is long (70 characters)

    Your title is 70 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Leading Provider of Microscopes and Accessories | AmScope – AmScope UK”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (225 characters)

    Your meta description is 225 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 483 internal links, 10 external

    The homepage links to 483 pages on amscope.co.uk and 10 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://amscope.co.uk/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://amscope.co.uk/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,572 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://amscope.co.uk/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 3 pages without a meta description

    https://amscope.co.uk/collections/omax-compound-microscope, https://amscope.co.uk/collections/iqcrew-compound-microscope and https://amscope.co.uk/collections/education-microscopes have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 pages without an H1

    https://amscope.co.uk/collections/amscope-compound-microscope, https://amscope.co.uk/collections/omax-compound-microscope, https://amscope.co.uk/collections/iqcrew-compound-microscope, https://amscope.co.uk/collections/binocular-compound-microscopes, https://amscope.co.uk/collections/monocular-compound-microscopes and https://amscope.co.uk/collections/trinocular-compound-microscopes and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 184 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fix78
  • 3 broken images

    3 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://amscope.co.uk/.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'defaultView')”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    318 of 356 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix92
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 423 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 2,692 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 2,692 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SUBSCRIBE”.

  • 35 calls to action

    The homepage has 35 calls to action, for example “SHOP BY BRAND | SUBCATEGORY”, “SHOP BY HEAD TYPE | SUBCATEGORY” and “SHOP BY SPECIALTY | SUBCATEGORY”.

  • 11 short forms

    11 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Klaviyo (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 19 cookies set on arrival

    19

    Opening the homepage sets 19 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 41 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 41 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at amscope.co.uk, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

No apps were seen in the code your storefront loads.

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 23 issues on amscope.co.uk, including 2 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25