Website review, no card needed
andreuworld.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202654 issues · 117 checks
This review found 54 issues worth fixing on andreuworld.com, 26 of them high impact, across 117 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
64D- #80,597 of 85,798 reviewed websitesbeats 5%
- #42,563 of 43,801 online storesbeats 2%
- #497 of 606 Magento storesbeats 16%
Closest competitors among Magento stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 176 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 178 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 172 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 177 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 112 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.7 s
1.4 s
2.0 s
2.7 s
3.4 s
4.1 s
4.8 s
5.4 s
andreuworld.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.8 s · 967 KiBAbout 967 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.6 s4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.
Mobile performance score: 44
44/100Your mobile performance score is 44 (desktop: 59). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 5.6 s
A phone's processor spends 5.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Vimeo and Facebook and others), adding 6.6 MB and 984 ms of main-thread time.
Vimeo adds 235 ms
235 msVimeo costs a phone 235 ms of main-thread work and 5.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Document request latency
550 msThe HTML itself could arrive about 550 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Reduce initial server response time
544 msReduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 544 ms on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 343 KiB17 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (343 KiB).
Google Tag Manager adds 296 ms
296 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 296 ms of main-thread work and 314 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2,370 HTML elements
The page has 2,370 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Server response: 644 ms
644 msYour server takes 644 ms to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 225 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
90 ms · 86 KiBAbout 86 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 90 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
49 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 49 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
5 KiB5 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 21.0 s
21.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 21.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 7.8 s
7.8 sYour largest element takes 7.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Engineering on display. Impeccable design Planar Table Disc…”.
Speed Index: 12.3 s
12.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 874 ms
874 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 874 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 2.7 s
2.7 sReal visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.3 s
2.3 sThe first text or image appears after 2.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
6 checks passed
Real-user INP: 144 ms
144 msReal visitors wait 144 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.03
0.03For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 36% faster for real visitors
-36%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 176 ms to 112 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 33% faster for real visitors
-33%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.1 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.035
0.035The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.035, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 7.9 MB in 156 requests
7.9 MBYour homepage downloads 7.9 MB in 156 requests on a phone: other files 5.1 MB (40), scripts 1.6 MB (71) and images 627 KiB (22). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (21 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.2 g of CO₂ per visit
2.23 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.23 g of CO₂e: 267.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Hidden but focusable
20 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
10 text elements with low contrast
10 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Interactive controls must not be nested (4 elements)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
4 tap targets too small
4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Links must have discernible text (3 elements)
Links must have discernible text: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
ARIA tab nodes must have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA tab nodes must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
4 form fields without a label
4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 83 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
47 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 57 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 10 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Page is set to noindex
The robots meta tag says “NOINDEX,NOFOLLOW”: Google is told not to list this page at all.
robots.txt blocks all crawlers
Your robots.txt disallows the whole site for every crawler, so search engines are told to stay out.
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Blocked from indexing
Google's crawler is blocked from indexing this page.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://andreuworld.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
196 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 196 pages on andreuworld.com and 5 external pages.
2 checks passed
Meta description: 72 characters
Your meta description is 72 characters: “Design chairs and tables for workspaces, living, hotels and restaurants.”.
Title: 58 characters
Your title is a healthy 58 characters: “Andreu World - Manufacturing a better world - Andreu World”.
AI search readiness
robots.txt blocks 6 AI answer engine crawlers
6 of 6Your robots.txt shuts out ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User), Claude search (Claude-SearchBot), Claude (Claude-User), Perplexity (PerplexityBot) and Perplexity (Perplexity-User). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers
robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.
1 checks passed
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (368 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
13 linked pages hidden from search
/en/resources/textiles, /en/resources/fabricapprovals, /en/resources/finishes, /en/resources/catalogs, /en/resources/quickship and /en/resources/certificates and 7 others are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.
3 pages share a title
/en, /en/stores/store/redirect/___store/en/___from_store/en/uenc/aHR0cHM6Ly9hbmRyZXV3b3JsZC5jb20vZW4v and /en/stores/store/redirect/___store/es/___from_store/en/uenc/aHR0cHM6Ly9hbmRyZXV3b3JsZC5jb20vZXMv all use the title “Andreu World - Manufacturing a better world - Andreu World”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
13 pages share a meta description
/en/resources/textiles, /en/resources/fabricapprovals, /en/resources/finishes, /en/resources/catalogs, /en/resources/quickship and /en/resources/certificates and 5 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
11 pages without an H1
/en/resources/textiles, /en/resources/fabricapprovals, /en/resources/finishes, /en/resources/catalogs, /en/resources/quickship and /en/about/about-us and 5 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 90 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 13 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Every page has a title
All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
4 small tap targets
4 of 15 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 third-party cookie
1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “%c%d font-size:0;color:transparent NaN”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
2 links through redirect chains
2 links go through two or more redirects, for example https://andreuworld.com/en/stores/store/redirect/___store/en/___from_store/en/uenc/aHR0cHM6Ly9hbmRyZXV3b3JsZC5jb20vZW4v/.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
7 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (andreuworld.com).
Valid certificate (79 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR1 verifies for andreuworld.com and is valid for another 79 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://andreuworld.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 45 links work
All 45 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 5 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
andreuworld.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
andreuworld.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 29 years old
29 yearsandreuworld.com was registered in May 1997 through Dinahosting s.l.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until May 2027
andreuworld.com is registered until May 2027.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 314 words of copy
The homepage carries about 314 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact”.
4 short forms
4 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel.
Email authentication
No DMARC policy
andreuworld.com has no DMARC record, so nothing tells receivers what to do with mail that fails SPF or DKIM. Gmail and Yahoo require DMARC from bulk senders.
Email authentication score: 50/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:mail21-244.srv2.de include:my343360.infomail.crm.ondemand.com inclu…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
24 cookies set on arrival
24Opening the homepage sets 24 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
24 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 24 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This free review found 54 issues on andreuworld.com, including 20 speed issues, 9 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.