Website review, no card needed

ankr.network logo

ankr.network website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202635 issues · 102 checks

This review found 35 issues worth fixing on ankr.network, 15 of them high impact, across 102 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
6.2 s3.0 sMay 2Oct 173.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20264.7 s
May 9, 20264.9 s
May 16, 20264.9 s
May 23, 20264.8 s
May 30, 20264.6 s
Jun 6, 20264.6 s
Jun 13, 20264.5 s
Jun 20, 20264.8 s
Jun 27, 20265.1 s
Jul 4, 20265.8 s
Jul 11, 20265.7 s
Jul 18, 20264.7 s
Jul 25, 20264.4 s
Aug 1, 20263.6 s
Aug 8, 20263.4 s
Aug 15, 20263.7 s
Aug 22, 20263.7 s
Aug 29, 20263.9 s
Sep 5, 20264.2 s
Sep 12, 20264.4 s
Sep 19, 20264.8 s
Sep 26, 20264.9 s
Oct 3, 20264.7 s
Oct 10, 20264.3 s
Oct 17, 20263.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
524 ms206 msMay 2Oct 17254 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026471 ms
May 9, 2026487 ms
May 16, 2026426 ms
May 23, 2026385 ms
May 30, 2026370 ms
Jun 6, 2026368 ms
Jun 13, 2026370 ms
Jun 20, 2026396 ms
Jun 27, 2026370 ms
Jul 4, 2026344 ms
Jul 11, 2026335 ms
Jul 18, 2026288 ms
Jul 25, 2026286 ms
Aug 1, 2026281 ms
Aug 8, 2026262 ms
Aug 15, 2026259 ms
Aug 22, 2026244 ms
Aug 29, 2026243 ms
Sep 5, 2026251 ms
Sep 12, 2026303 ms
Sep 19, 2026339 ms
Sep 26, 2026337 ms
Oct 3, 2026319 ms
Oct 10, 2026289 ms
Oct 17, 2026254 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of ankr.network (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. ankr.network at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. ankr.network at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. ankr.network at 1.8 s1.8 s
  4. ankr.network at 2.5 s2.5 s
  5. ankr.network at 3.1 s3.1 s
  6. ankr.network at 3.7 s3.7 s
  7. ankr.network at 4.3 s4.3 s
  8. ankr.network at 4.9 s4.9 s

ankr.network does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

7 to fix37
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    5.9 s · 4.0 MB

    51 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (4.0 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.2 s · 254 KiB

    About 254 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 37

    37/100

    Your mobile performance score is 37 (desktop: 78). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and osano.com and others), adding 456 KiB and 862 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 463 ms

    463 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 463 ms of main-thread work and 327 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 11 long tasks on the main thread

    11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 366 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Main-thread work: 2.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Render-blocking requests

    150 ms

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 150 ms.

  • Improve image delivery

    147 KiB

    2 images could be 147 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    50 ms · 13 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 50 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    11 KiB

    About 11 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 78 but mobile only 37. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 15 ms

    15 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 15 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 12.8 s

    12.8 s

    Your largest element takes 12.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 13.1 s

    13.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 13.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.9 s

    6.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user INP: 205 ms

    205 ms

    Real visitors wait 205 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user TTFB: 854 ms

    854 ms

    Real visitors wait 854 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 7 images without width and height

    7 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 43% faster for real visitors

    -43%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 471 ms to 254 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 14% faster for real visitors

    -14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.7 s to 3.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 5.0 MB in 63 requests

    5.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.0 MB in 63 requests on a phone: media 2.5 MB (2), scripts 956 KiB (17) and images 862 KiB (12). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 4 images in older formats

    4 images (386 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (182 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.42 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.42 g of CO₂e: 170.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8191
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 49 text elements with low contrast

    49 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h4 → h6 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 21 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 7 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 9298
  • 6 links with vague text

    6 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 62 internal links, 25 external

    The homepage links to 62 pages on ankr.network and 25 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 141 characters

    Your meta description is 141 characters: “Build on Web3 with a fast, reliable and distributed network of blockchain nodes. Earn with Liquid Staking and integrate…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Build any Web3 project with leading performance.”.

  • Title: 38 characters

    Your title is a healthy 38 characters: “Ankr | The Fastest Web3 Infrastructure”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.ankr.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.ankr.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (456 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (3 KiB, 14 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

4 to fix81
  • 2 pages share a title

    /case-studies/bnb and /case-studies all use the title “Ankr | Case studies”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 5 pages share a meta description

    /case-studies/sentora, /case-studies/mantle, /case-studies/bnb, /case-studies and /blog use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /blog, whose canonical is /blog/page/1. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 4 pages without an H1

    /case-studies/sentora, /case-studies/mantle, /case-studies/bnb and /case-studies have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 36 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    15 of 16 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix94
  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • 2 links through redirect chains

    2 links go through two or more redirects, for example https://helpdesk.ankr.com/.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (ankr.com).

  • Valid certificate (82 days left)

    The certificate from Amazon · Amazon RSA 2048 M01 verifies for ankr.network and is valid for another 82 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://ankr.network redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 53 links work

    All 53 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 13 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    ankr.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    ankr.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 19 years old

    19 years

    ankr.com was registered in Apr 2007 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Apr 2027

    ankr.com is registered until Apr 2027.

Content and conversion

1 to fix80
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 388 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 388 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 7 calls to action

    The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Start for free”, “Learn more” and “Talk to expert”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 3 testimonial or review blocks, 9 trust badges and “18k+ users”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Email authentication

3 to fix25
  • No SPF record

    ankr.network has no SPF record, so mail servers can't tell which servers may send email as you. Your mail lands in spam more often, and anyone can send mail pretending to be you.

  • DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)

    DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be ankr.network is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.

  • No DKIM key on the usual selectors

    We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.

  • Email authentication score: 25/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Hotjar (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Osano) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 6 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Osano

    A consent management tool (Osano) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
AWS

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 35 issues on ankr.network, including 16 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25