Website review, no card needed
ansarada.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202636 issues · 81 checks
This review found 36 issues worth fixing on ansarada.com, 14 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
72CClosest competitors among SaaS websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 277 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 277 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 274 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 288 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 296 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 270 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 265 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 272 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 263 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 282 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 296 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 323 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 327 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 375 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 419 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 383 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 425 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 445 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 419 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 384 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 362 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 306 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 355 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 387 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 387 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.9 s
1.9 s
2.8 s
3.7 s
4.6 s
5.6 s
6.5 s
7.4 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.7 s · 1.4 MBAbout 1.4 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.7 s faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 1.2 s
1.2 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.2 s of main-thread work and 866 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 10.4 s
A phone's processor spends 10.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 30
30/100Your mobile performance score is 30. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Intercom and Facebook and others), adding 2.5 MB and 2.8 s of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
450 ms · 591 KiB32 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (591 KiB).
Intercom adds 875 ms
875 msIntercom costs a phone 875 ms of main-thread work and 946 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
450 ms8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 450 ms.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 416 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
2,450 HTML elements
The page has 2,450 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Legacy JavaScript
100 ms · 77 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 77 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
40 ms · 41 KiBAbout 41 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 40 ms faster on a phone.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Improve image delivery
4 KiB1 image could be 4 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
1 checks passed
Server response: 21 ms
21 msYour server sent the HTML in 21 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 20.5 s
20.5 sYour largest element takes 20.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Background”.
Time to Interactive: 35.8 s
35.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 35.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 12.4 s
12.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 2.2 s
2.2 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 2.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 3.7 s
3.7 sThe first text or image appears after 3.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user INP: 247 ms
247 msReal visitors wait 247 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 40% slower for real visitors
+40%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 277 ms to 387 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.02
0.02The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.02, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 7.1 MB in 210 requests
7.1 MBYour homepage downloads 7.1 MB in 210 requests on a phone: scripts 3.2 MB (74), media 1.5 MB (1) and images 1.3 MB (56). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 2.0 g of CO₂ per visit
2.01 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.01 g of CO₂e: 241.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Documents must have <title> element to aid in navigation (1 element)
Documents must have <title> element to aid in navigation: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
<html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)
<html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Hidden but focusable
36 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
5 tap targets too small
5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
4 text elements with low contrast
4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (5 elements).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 77 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
10 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 14 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 10 passed and 4 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
5 links with vague text
5 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
364 internal links, 6 external
The homepage links to 364 pages on ansarada.com and 6 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 151 characters
Your meta description is 151 characters: “Always achieve the best outcome with Ansarada's advanced Virtual Data Room solutions. Leave legacy data rooms behind & …”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “The AI data room designed for deals”.
Title: 59 characters
Your title is a healthy 59 characters: “Ansarada - AI-Powered Virtual Data Rooms & Dealmaking Tools”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.ansarada.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, Review, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.ansarada.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.ansarada.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Other pages
4 pages share a meta description
https://www.ansarada.com/data-room/getting-started-deals, https://www.ansarada.com/data-room/transactions-automated-q-a, https://www.ansarada.com/data-room/transactions-dashboard-reporting and https://www.ansarada.com/data-room/getting-started-procure use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
3 pages without an H1
https://www.ansarada.com/data-room/ask-aida, https://www.ansarada.com/data-room/ai-sort and https://www.ansarada.com/data-room/ai-translate have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
3 pages slow to respond
https://www.ansarada.com/procure/bidder-submissions-tool, https://www.ansarada.com/procure/bid-evaluation-tool and https://www.ansarada.com/data-room/ask-aida took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 102 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “The source list for the Content Security Policy directive 'script-src' contains an invalid source: 'https://google.*'. …”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 13 words
The homepage has only about 13 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
3 checks passed
48 calls to action
The homepage has 48 calls to action, for example “Buy-side M&A”, “Start for free” and “Get a demo”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 2 customer or partner logos and 3 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads FullStory, Google Tag Manager and HubSpot (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
1 cookie set on arrival
1Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
13 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 13 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ansarada.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
- Analytics
- FullStory
- Hosting
- Vercel
Company
- Founded
- 2005
- Headquarters
- Sydney
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 36 issues on ansarada.com, including 20 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.