Website review, no card needed
ansmann.de website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202620 issues · 96 checks
This review found 20 issues worth fixing on ansmann.de, 3 of them high impact, across 96 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
92AClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 816 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 781 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 733 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 803 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 764 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 764 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 777 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 772 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 830 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 835 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 855 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 842 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 805 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 786 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 762 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 790 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 780 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 753 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 738 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 715 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 684 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 692 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 665 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 676 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 718 ms |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 106 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 103 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 101 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 104 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 104 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
ansmann.de does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.6 s1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 1.6 s.
Mobile performance score: 89
89/100Your mobile performance score is 89 (desktop: 100). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
258 KiBAbout 258 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Google Tag Manager adds 112 ms
112 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 112 ms of main-thread work and 305 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
website-files.com adds 64 ms
64 mswebsite-files.com costs a phone 64 ms of main-thread work and 377 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, website-files.com and cloudfront.net and others), adding 744 KiB and 221 ms of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 81 KiB3 images could be 81 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 29 KiBAbout 29 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
42 KiB2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (42 KiB).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Legacy JavaScript
5 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 5 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify JavaScript
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.6 s
A phone's processor spends 0.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 262 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 3 ms
3 msYour server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
First Contentful Paint: 2.3 s
2.3 sThe first text or image appears after 2.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 3.0 s
3.0 sYour largest element takes 3.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.102
0.102The layout shifts by 0.102 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
10 images without width and height
10 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
0%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 106 ms to 104 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
10 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors wait 1.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 120 ms
120 msReal visitors wait 120 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 0.8 s
0.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 486 ms
486 msReal visitors wait 486 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 13% faster for real visitors
-13%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.8 s to 0.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Speed Index: 2.8 s
2.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 2.8 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.
Time to Interactive: 3.0 s
3.0 sThe page is fully interactive after 3.0 s.
Total Blocking Time: 0 ms
0 msScripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
About 0.3 g of CO₂ per visit
0.27 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.27 g of CO₂e: 31.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
4 checks passed
Page weight: 960 KiB in 25 requests
960 KiBYour homepage downloads 960 KiB in 25 requests on a phone: scripts 618 KiB (10), images 205 KiB (8) and fonts 80 KiB (3). That is a lean page.
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (48 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 48 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 20 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
44 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 3 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
61 internal links, 23 external
The homepage links to 61 pages on ansmann.de and 23 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 119 characters
Your meta description is 119 characters: “Durch energieeffiziente Produkte, Lösungen und Technologien erleichtern wir dir deinen Alltag. Kabellos ist unser Ding.”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “We awakenProducts for life”.
Title: 44 characters
Your title is a healthy 44 characters: “ANSMANN AG - Wir erwecken Produkte zum Leben”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.ansmann.de/en.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.ansmann.de/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and contact details; sameAs (social profiles) and description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (610 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
/karriere/karriere-bei-ansmann and /en/karriere/karriere-bei-ansmann all use the title “Karriere bei ANSMANN”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
2 pages share a meta description
/karriere/karriere-bei-ansmann and /en/karriere/karriere-bei-ansmann use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 33 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
14 of 17 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
1 broken external link
1 link to other sites is dead, for example https://shop.ansmann.de/powerstations (404).
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
2 redirects before the homepage
Opening https://ansmann.de goes through 2 redirects before the homepage loads.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
7 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (ansmann.de).
Valid certificate (31 days left)
The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for ansmann.de and is valid for another 31 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://ansmann.de redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
ansmann.de has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 4 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 378 words of copy
The homepage carries about 378 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
4 calls to action
The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Contact us”, “Learn more about us” and “Find a contact person”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be ansmann.de is still delivered. Add a report address, check the reports, then move to quarantine.
Email authentication score: 75/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 a mx ip4:217.6.105.111 ip4:185.197.41.107 ip4:217.6.105.217 ip4:217.6.105.231 ip4:217.6.105.100 ip4:85.13.130.17…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1” and “selector2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
5 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- Webflow
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Company
- Headquarters
- Assamstadt
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This free review found 20 issues on ansmann.de, including 9 speed issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.