Website review, no card needed
ant.it website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202652 issues · 111 checks
This review found 52 issues worth fixing on ant.it, 24 of them high impact, across 111 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
69DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 5.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 200 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 199 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 199 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 209 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 222 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 228 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 236 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 244 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 252 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 252 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 250 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 251 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
23.6 s · 17.9 MB175 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (17.9 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
10.8 s · 1.6 MBAbout 1.6 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 10.8 s faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
5.3 s · 2.7 MB8 images could be 2.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.3 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
6.2 s35 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 6.2 s.
Mobile performance score: 41
41/100Your mobile performance score is 41. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 5.3 s
A phone's processor spends 5.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
3,538 HTML elements
The page has 3,538 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and Facebook and others), adding 3.6 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
600 ms · 129 KiBAbout 129 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Google CDN adds 328 ms
328 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 328 ms of main-thread work and 758 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 328 ms
328 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 328 ms of main-thread work and 374 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
17 long tasks on the main thread
17 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 259 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Vimeo adds 89 ms
89 msVimeo costs a phone 89 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Maps adds 105 ms
105 msGoogle Maps costs a phone 105 ms of main-thread work and 392 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
tidio.co adds 62 ms
62 mstidio.co costs a phone 62 ms of main-thread work and 515 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 25 KiB25 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Legacy JavaScript
28 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 28 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 228 ms
228 msYour server sent the HTML in 228 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 7.8 s
7.8 sReal visitors wait 7.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 6.5 s
6.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 6.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 5.1 s
5.1 sReal visitors wait 5.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 59.5 s
59.5 sYour largest element takes 59.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Una seduta scura ricoperta di fiori rosa, con una scritta i…”.
Speed Index: 27.4 s
27.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 27.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 71.3 s
71.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 71.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 6.8 s
6.8 sThe first text or image appears after 6.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user INP: 223 ms
223 msReal visitors wait 223 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 26% slower for real visitors
+26%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 200 ms to 251 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 468 ms
468 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 468 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.107
0.107The layout shifts by 0.107 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
6 images without width and height
6 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
0%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.3 s to 3.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
1 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 26.1 MB in 253 requests
26.1 MBYour homepage downloads 26.1 MB in 253 requests on a phone: images 21.2 MB (97), scripts 3.6 MB (64) and fonts 638 KiB (15). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
10 images over 500 KB
10 images weigh 10.6 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
13 images far larger than shown
7.4 MB13 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 5x1000-new-mobile.png at 2,560 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 7.4 MB.
22 images in older formats
22 images (13.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
5 images below the first screen load straight away
5 images further down the page (2.1 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 7.4 g of CO₂ per visit
7.40 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 7.40 g of CO₂e: 887.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Invalid ARIA attributes
1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
18 text elements with low contrast
18 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
8 tap targets too small
8 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
10 images without alt text
10 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
5 links without text
5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 checks passed
49 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 5 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
12 links crawlers can't follow
12 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
132 internal links, 98 external
The homepage links to 132 pages on ant.it and 98 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 144 characters
Your meta description is 144 characters: “Fondazione ANT Franco Pannuti ETS fornisce assistenza medica gratuita a casa dei malati di tumore e progetti di prevenz…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Home”.
Title: 33 characters
Your title is a healthy 33 characters: “Fondazione ANT Franco Pannuti ETS”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://ant.it/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Article, ImageObject, NGO, Organization and Person.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://ant.it/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and contact details; sameAs (social profiles) and description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,974 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
/pensieri-della-settimana is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
7 pages slow to respond
/chi-siamo, /chi-siamo/dove-siamo-contatti, /chi-siamo/associazione-amici-ant, /chi-siamo/comunicazione, /chi-siamo/consiglio-di-amministrazione and /chi-siamo/organismo-di-vigilanza and 1 other took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 65 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 third-party cookies
2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
94 of 109 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HTTP/1.1 only
The server only offers HTTP/1.1, so browsers open several connections and load files more slowly. Most hosts and CDNs turn on HTTP/2 with a setting.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
4 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (ant.it).
Valid certificate (48 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR1 verifies for ant.it and is valid for another 48 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://ant.it redirects to the secure version.
All 60 links work
All 60 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 20 external) answered without errors; 3 did not answer within 5 s.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
ant.it has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 4 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,520 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,520 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be ant.it is still delivered. Add a report address, check the reports, then move to quarantine.
Email authentication score: 75/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 ip4:46.44.246.67 ip4:46.44.246.66 ip4:188.172.138.0/28 include:_spf.vianova.it include:spf.protection.outlook.co…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector2” and “mandrill”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (iubenda) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
12 cookies set on arrival
12Opening the homepage sets 12 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
27 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 27 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: iubenda
A consent management tool (iubenda) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
- 3 plugins are behind their latest release.header-footer-elementor 1.6.28 → 2.9.5 · contact-form-7 6.1.7 → 6.2.3 · pixelyoursite 0.2.3 → 11.4.4
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress 7.1.3
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- AWS
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 52 issues on ant.it, including 28 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.