Website review, no card needed
antier.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202648 issues · 113 checks
This review found 48 issues worth fixing on antier.com, 18 of them high impact, across 113 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
68DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 6.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 6.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 4.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2026 | 233 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 274 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 272 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 271 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 268 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 261 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 254 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 256 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 265 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 286 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 327 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 355 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 356 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 349 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 328 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 323 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 316 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 336 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 335 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 328 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 342 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
3.8 s · 337 KiBAbout 337 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.8 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
3.3 s24 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.3 s.
20,897 HTML elements
The page has 20,897 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Reduce unused CSS
1.1 s · 399 KiBAbout 399 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 45
45/100Your mobile performance score is 45. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.0 s
A phone's processor spends 4.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, cdn-cookieyes.com and reddit and others), adding 1.2 MB and 731 ms of main-thread time.
Google CDN adds 485 ms
485 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 485 ms of main-thread work and 739 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
300 ms · 35 KiB4 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (35 KiB).
Legacy JavaScript
300 ms · 29 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 29 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Google Fonts adds 3 ms
3 msGoogle Fonts costs a phone 3 ms of main-thread work and 312 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
250 ms · 43 KiB3 images could be 43 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.
11 long tasks on the main thread
11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 243 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Minify JavaScript
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 25 ms
25 msYour server sent the HTML in 25 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user FCP: 3.0 s
3.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 8.0 s
8.0 sThe first text or image appears after 8.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 19.9 s
19.9 sYour largest element takes 19.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Purpose-built AI and blockchain infrastructure for Stableco…”.
Time to Interactive: 20.4 s
20.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 20.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 8.0 s
8.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.5 s
3.5 sReal visitors wait 3.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 312 ms
312 msReal visitors wait 312 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 32% slower for real visitors
+32%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 233 ms to 342 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user TTFB: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors wait 1.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 462 ms
462 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 462 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
7 images without width and height
7 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
3 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.07
0.07For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.07 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 34% faster for real visitors
-34%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 6.4 s to 4.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.064
0.064The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.064, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.5 MB in 181 requests
4.5 MBYour homepage downloads 4.5 MB in 181 requests on a phone: images 2.3 MB (68), scripts 1.1 MB (39) and other files 402 KiB (39). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
75 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example Integrate-Blockchain-Simplify-Logistics-Operations.png at 1,862 px wide, shown at 318 px. Resized copies would save about 75 KiB.
3 images below the first screen load straight away
3 images further down the page (158 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit
1.28 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.28 g of CO₂e: 153.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
Links look like plain text
1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)
Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)
Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one main landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one main landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
54 form fields without a label
54 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 91 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
47 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 8 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Meta description is long (174 characters)
Your meta description is 174 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
6 links with vague text
6 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
39 internal links, 15 external
The homepage links to 39 pages on antier.com and 15 external pages.
6 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Purpose-built AI and blockchain infrastructure for Stablecoin Rails”.
Title: 55 characters
Your title is a healthy 55 characters: “Antier | AI & Blockchain Infrastructure for Enterprises”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.antier.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.antier.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,069 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (23 KiB, 179 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
3 pages point its canonical at the homepage
/blockmaze-rwa-tokenization-case-study, /legal-licensing-playbook and /rwa-techonology-playbook declare the homepage as their canonical URL, which tells Google they are copies of the homepage and keeps them out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.
1 linked page hidden from search
/stablecoin-remittance-platform-development-case-study is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
4 pages share a title
/, /blockmaze-rwa-tokenization-case-study, /legal-licensing-playbook and /rwa-techonology-playbook all use the title “Antier | AI & Blockchain Infrastructure for Enterprises”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
3 pages share a meta description
/blockmaze-rwa-tokenization-case-study, /legal-licensing-playbook and /rwa-techonology-playbook use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 20 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.antier.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/11/Invuture.pdf.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of null (reading 'querySelectorAll')”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
9 of 10 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
1 broken link to your own pages
1 link from your homepage to your own site is broken, for example https://www.antier.com/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection (404).
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
2 links through redirect chains
2 links go through two or more redirects, for example https://www.antier.com/blockmaze-rwa-tokenization-case-study/.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
6 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (antier.com).
Valid certificate (54 days left)
The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for antier.com and is valid for another 54 days.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://antier.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
antier.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
antier.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 22 years old
22 yearsantier.com was registered in May 2004 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until May 2027
antier.com is registered until May 2027.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
A 9-field form
Your longest form asks for 9 fields (5 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 929 words of copy
The homepage carries about 929 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
4 checks passed
12 calls to action
The homepage has 12 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Learn More” and “Request a working session”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and LinkedIn Insight.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 3 phone links and 0 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be antier.com is still delivered. Add a report address, check the reports, then move to quarantine.
Email authentication score: 70/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:dc-aa8e722993._spfm.antier.com ~all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight, Reddit Pixel and X (Twitter) Ads (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (CookieYes) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
5 cookies set on arrival
5Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
16 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 16 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: CookieYes
A consent management tool (CookieYes) loads with the page.
Upkeep, stack and company
No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress 7.1.4
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 48 issues on antier.com, including 23 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.