Website review, no card needed

aol.com logo

aol.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 October 202627 issues · 81 checks

This review found 27 issues worth fixing on aol.com, 6 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Google's speed test didn't respond, so speed is not measured here; your full playbook measures it. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Site score

Not scored yet: Google's speed test didn't run in this review. Re-run the review to get a score.

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.9 s2.4 sApr 18Oct 32.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20262.6 s
Apr 25, 20262.7 s
May 2, 20262.7 s
May 9, 20262.7 s
May 16, 20262.7 s
May 23, 20262.7 s
May 30, 20262.8 s
Jun 6, 20262.8 s
Jun 13, 20262.8 s
Jun 20, 20262.8 s
Jun 27, 20262.8 s
Jul 4, 20262.8 s
Jul 11, 20262.7 s
Jul 18, 20262.6 s
Jul 25, 20262.6 s
Aug 1, 20262.6 s
Aug 8, 20262.6 s
Aug 15, 20262.7 s
Aug 22, 20262.7 s
Aug 29, 20262.6 s
Sep 5, 20262.6 s
Sep 12, 20262.5 s
Sep 19, 20262.5 s
Sep 26, 20262.5 s
Oct 3, 20262.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
197 ms118 msApr 18Oct 3188 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026132 ms
Apr 25, 2026135 ms
May 2, 2026133 ms
May 9, 2026130 ms
May 16, 2026128 ms
May 23, 2026127 ms
May 30, 2026129 ms
Jun 6, 2026133 ms
Jun 13, 2026138 ms
Jun 20, 2026141 ms
Jun 27, 2026141 ms
Jul 4, 2026141 ms
Jul 11, 2026139 ms
Jul 18, 2026142 ms
Jul 25, 2026149 ms
Aug 1, 2026161 ms
Aug 8, 2026176 ms
Aug 15, 2026186 ms
Aug 22, 2026183 ms
Aug 29, 2026180 ms
Sep 5, 2026180 ms
Sep 12, 2026180 ms
Sep 19, 2026184 ms
Sep 26, 2026188 ms
Oct 3, 2026188 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

No screenshot is available for this review.

Speed

Not measured in this review.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on your site (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.11

    0.11

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.11 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 41% slower for real visitors

    +41%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 132 ms to 188 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user TTFB: 832 ms

    832 ms

    Real visitors wait 832 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.6 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 188 ms

    188 ms

    Real visitors wait 188 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

Images and page weight

2 to fix81
  • Page weight: 2.4 MB

    2.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.4 MB on a phone, 493 KiB of it images (20%). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    4228fc85-2a65-4e81-825b-18263f40a7c7.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (73 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.69 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.69 g of CO₂e: 82.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fix92
  • Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents (14 elements)

    Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents: 14 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (7 elements)

    Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (25 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 25 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (2 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 198 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 7 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fix82
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • 266 internal links, 58 external

    The homepage links to 266 pages on aol.com and 58 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 144 characters

    Your meta description is 144 characters: “Discover the latest breaking news in the U.S. and around the world — politics, weather, entertainment, lifestyle, finan…”.

  • Title: 57 characters

    Your title is a healthy 57 characters: “News, Politics, Sports, Mail & Latest Headlines - AOL.com”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.aol.com/products/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix70
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • Parts of the site are closed to 2 AI crawlers

    Your robots.txt lets ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User) and Perplexity (PerplexityBot) read the homepage but closes other sections to them, so answers about those pages can't cite you.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 4 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.

1 checks passed
  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,801 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 4 pages share 2 titles

    / and /local all use the title “News, Politics, Sports, Mail & Latest Headlines - AOL.com”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 7 pages share a meta description

    /food, /health, /shopping, /style and /travel use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 4 pages slow to respond

    /true-crime, /finance, /finance/banking and /news/business took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 86 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fix93
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught Error: Minified React error #418; visit https://react.dev/errors/418?args[]=HTML&args[]= for the full message …”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    167 of 168 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix94
  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • 1 link through redirect chains

    1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://auth.www.aol.com/login?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.aol.com%2F.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

8 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (aol.com).

  • Valid certificate (149 days left)

    The certificate from Amazon · Amazon RSA 2048 M04 verifies for aol.com and is valid for another 149 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://aol.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 60 links work

    All 60 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 20 external) answered without errors; 5 did not answer within 5 s.

  • security.txt published

    A security.txt file tells researchers how to report a problem with your site.

Domain and trust

  • DNSSEC is off

    aol.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

3 checks passed
  • Domain is 31 years old

    31 years

    aol.com was registered in Jun 1995 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Certificate issuers are restricted

    CAA records allow only letsencrypt.org, sectigo.com, amazon.com and amazonaws.com to issue certificates for aol.com, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.

  • Registered until Nov 2027

    aol.com is registered until Nov 2027.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 2,179 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 2,179 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “New book 'Looking for Terry'”, “Reserve for endangered animals” and “Join AOL”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 94 customer or partner logos and 4 trust badges.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.

Email authentication

2 to fix75
  • SPF does not block other senders (no all)

    Your SPF record doesn't end in -all or ~all, so it doesn't stop other servers sending as you: “v=spf1 redirect=_spf.mail.yahoo.com”.

  • No DKIM key on the usual selectors

    We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.

  • Email authentication score: 75/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

1 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 7 trackers load before any consent

    7

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Comscore, Criteo, Google Ads and Taboola and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 13 cookies set on arrival

    13

    Opening the homepage sets 13 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 39 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 39 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 27 issues on aol.com, including 5 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25