Website review, no card needed

appcard.com logo

appcard.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202628 issues · 92 checks

This review found 28 issues worth fixing on appcard.com, 11 of them high impact, across 92 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.3 s4.8 sMay 2Oct 174.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20265.2 s
May 9, 20265.1 s
May 16, 20265.2 s
May 23, 20265.0 s
May 30, 20264.9 s
Jun 6, 20264.9 s
Jun 13, 20264.9 s
Jun 20, 20265.1 s
Jun 27, 20265.3 s
Jul 4, 20265.3 s
Jul 11, 20265.3 s
Jul 18, 20265.2 s
Jul 25, 20265.1 s
Aug 1, 20265.1 s
Aug 8, 20265.0 s
Aug 15, 20265.0 s
Aug 22, 20265.0 s
Aug 29, 20265.0 s
Sep 5, 20264.9 s
Sep 12, 20264.9 s
Sep 19, 20264.9 s
Sep 26, 20264.9 s
Oct 3, 20264.9 s
Oct 10, 20264.9 s
Oct 17, 20264.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
140 ms133 msMay 2Oct 17137 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026136 ms
May 9, 2026134 ms
May 16, 2026136 ms
May 23, 2026135 ms
May 30, 2026134 ms
Jun 6, 2026135 ms
Jun 13, 2026135 ms
Jun 20, 2026137 ms
Jun 27, 2026138 ms
Jul 4, 2026137 ms
Jul 11, 2026137 ms
Jul 18, 2026137 ms
Jul 25, 2026137 ms
Aug 1, 2026138 ms
Aug 8, 2026137 ms
Aug 15, 2026137 ms
Aug 22, 2026137 ms
Aug 29, 2026138 ms
Sep 5, 2026138 ms
Sep 12, 2026139 ms
Sep 19, 2026139 ms
Sep 26, 2026138 ms
Oct 3, 2026138 ms
Oct 10, 2026138 ms
Oct 17, 2026137 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

4 to fix59
  • Improve image delivery

    1.8 s · 2.7 MB

    18 images could be 2.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.6 s · 322 KiB

    About 322 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.3 s

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.3 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 59

    59/100

    Your mobile performance score is 59 (desktop: 90). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 13 KiB

    About 13 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 97 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 90 but mobile only 59. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • 1 third-party service on the page

    1 third-party service load with your homepage (Google Fonts), adding 34 KiB and 0 ms of main-thread time.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 135 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 10.1 s

    10.1 s

    Your largest element takes 10.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Everything You Need to Earn Loyalty & Drive Sales”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 10.6 s

    10.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 10.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.4 s

    7.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 893 ms

    893 ms

    Real visitors wait 893 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 35 images without width and height

    35 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 136 ms to 137 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.2 s to 4.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 182 ms

    182 ms

    Real visitors wait 182 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 24 ms

    24 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 24 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

5 to fix33
  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 1.9 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 8 images far larger than shown

    2.3 MB

    8 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example randys-centered.png at 1,376 px wide, shown at 56 px. Resized copies would save about 2.3 MB.

  • Page weight: 3.4 MB in 26 requests

    3.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.4 MB in 26 requests on a phone: images 2.8 MB (21), scripts 483 KiB (1) and fonts 32 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 13 images in older formats

    13 images (2.7 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 11 images below the first screen load straight away

    11 images further down the page (2.4 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.95 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.95 g of CO₂e: 114.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

1 to fixGoogle 10099
  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 38 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 0 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10091
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://appcard.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • 33 internal links, 4 external

    The homepage links to 33 pages on appcard.com and 4 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 159 characters

    Your meta description is 159 characters: “AppCard empowers 3,000+ independent grocers with personalized marketing, shopper analytics, and in-lane engagement tool…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Everything You Need to Earn Loyalty & Drive Sales”.

  • Title: 40 characters

    Your title is a healthy 40 characters: “AppCard | Customer Retention, Simplified”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://appcard.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (744 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix90
  • 14 pages point its canonical at the homepage

    /news/iga-2026-red-oval-service-provider-of-the-year, /partners, /contact, /case-studies, /products/in-lane-terminal and /products/kiosk and 8 others declare the homepage as their canonical URL, which tells Google they are copies of the homepage and keeps them out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 29 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    8 of 8 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

2 to fix83
  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

4 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (appcard.com).

  • Valid certificate (68 days left)

    The certificate from ZeroSSL GmbH · ZeroSSL RSA DV SSL CA 2 verifies for appcard.com and is valid for another 68 days.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://appcard.com redirects to the secure version.

  • All 35 links work

    All 35 links checked from your homepage (31 internal, 4 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    appcard.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    appcard.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 27 years old

    27 years

    appcard.com was registered in Dec 1998 through Moniker Online Services LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Nov 2028

    appcard.com is registered until Nov 2028.

Content and conversion

2 to fix83
  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • A 9-field form

    Your longest form asks for 9 fields (0 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 735 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 735 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Request a Demo”.

  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Request a Demo” and “Request Demo”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 4 testimonial or review blocks and 2 trust badges.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

Email authentication

1 to fix70
  • DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)

    DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be appcard.com is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.

  • Email authentication score: 70/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com include:stspg-customer.com include:sender.zohoinvoice.com ip4:52.2…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 2 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

Framework
Tailwind CSS

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 28 issues on appcard.com, including 12 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25