Website review, no card needed
applyshop.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202637 issues · 104 checks
This review found 37 issues worth fixing on applyshop.com, 8 of them high impact, across 104 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
83B- #18,249 of 82,255 reviewed websitesbeats 73%
- #10,805 of 40,940 online storesbeats 67%
- #10,393 of 36,310 Shopify storesbeats 65%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 1.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 182 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 119 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
applyshop.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Mobile performance score: 79
79/100Your mobile performance score is 79. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Render-blocking requests
950 ms15 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 950 ms.
Main-thread work: 2.2 s
A phone's processor spends 2.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 799 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (paytring.com, rise-ai.com and Google CDN and others), adding 488 KiB and 419 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 208 KiBAbout 208 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 37 KiBAbout 37 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
154 KiB20 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (154 KiB).
Improve image delivery
90 KiB2 images could be 90 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Legacy JavaScript
18 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 18 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify JavaScript
7 KiB7 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 6 ms
6 msYour server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 4.7 s
4.7 sYour largest element takes 4.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “cms-image”.
Tap response (INP) got 26% slower for real visitors
+26%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 114 ms to 119 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user TTFB: 942 ms
942 msReal visitors wait 942 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.7 s
2.7 sThe first text or image appears after 2.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 4.7 s
4.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 4.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
12 images without width and height
12 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
8 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 119 ms
119 msReal visitors wait 119 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 33% faster for real visitors
-33%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Speed Index: 3.0 s
3.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 3.0 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.03
0.03The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.03, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 0 ms
0 msScripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.0 MB in 223 requests
2.0 MBYour homepage downloads 2.0 MB in 223 requests on a phone: other files 893 KiB (116), scripts 700 KiB (70) and images 268 KiB (19). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
2 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example Frame_12112.png at 1,094 px wide, shown at 360 px. Resized copies would save about 2 KiB.
About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit
0.58 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.58 g of CO₂e: 69.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
All page content should be contained by landmarks (5 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
6 form fields without a label
6 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
6 links without text
6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 32 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
42 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
robots.txt blocks all crawlers
Your robots.txt disallows the whole site for every crawler, so search engines are told to stay out.
Blocked from indexing
Google's crawler is blocked from indexing this page.
Title is long (91 characters)
Your title is 91 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “The easiest way to grow your business with world-leading brands – ApplyBoard Test Solutio…”.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “ld+json block 1 is not valid JSON (Expected double-quoted property name in JSON at position 232)”.
8 links with vague text
8 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
One H1 headline
Your <h1> is empty.
73 internal links, 27 external
The homepage links to 73 pages on applyshop.com and 27 external pages.
4 checks passed
Meta description: 102 characters
Your meta description is 102 characters: “ApplyShop is the world's number one marketplace for study-abroad products like English exams and more!”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://tests.applyboard.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://tests.applyboard.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
robots.txt blocks 6 AI answer engine crawlers
6 of 6Your robots.txt shuts out ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User), Claude search (Claude-SearchBot), Claude (Claude-User), Perplexity (PerplexityBot) and Perplexity (Perplexity-User). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers
robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.
2 checks passed
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,256 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (5 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page without a title
/customer_authentication/redirect has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
1 linked page hidden from search
/customer_authentication/redirect is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
13 pages without a meta description
/collections/duolingo, /collections/pearson, /collections/ets%C2%AE, /collections/celpip-test-voucher, /collections/blyth-academy-online and /collections/ontario-virtual-school and 7 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /collections/ets%C2%AE, whose canonical is /collections/ets%c2%ae. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
1 page without an H1
/customer_authentication/redirect has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 18 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
2 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://cdn.paytring.com/logo/quick/applyboard.png.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Shopify is not defined”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
11 of 13 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
2 broken links to your own pages
2 links from your homepage to your own site are broken, for example https://tests.applyboard.com/cart (network).
Short HSTS lifetime
HSTS is set, but max-age is 91 days; one year is the recommended minimum.
1 link through redirect chains
1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://tests.applyboard.com/customer_authentication/redirect?locale=en®ion_country=US.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
6 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (tests.applyboard.com).
Valid certificate (50 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE1 verifies for applyshop.com and is valid for another 50 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
http:// redirects to https
http://applyshop.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
4 checks passed
Domain is 12 years old
12 yearsapplyboard.com was registered in Nov 2013 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Certificate issuers are restricted
CAA records allow only globalsign.com, letsencrypt.org, pki.goog and ssl.com to issue certificates for applyboard.com, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.
DNSSEC is on
applyboard.com's DNS answers are signed (DNSSEC), so they can't be forged on the way to visitors.
Registered until Nov 2031
applyboard.com is registered until Nov 2031.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: “2,000+ Customers”. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
About 717 words of copy
The homepage carries about 717 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact”.
11 calls to action
The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Learn More” and “Apply”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 95/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: reject
DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:mailgun.org ~all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
12 cookies set on arrival
12Opening the homepage sets 12 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
28 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 28 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify;Shopify Plus
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 37 issues on applyshop.com, including 10 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.