Website review, no card needed

aptosolutions.com logo

aptosolutions.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202638 issues · 102 checks

This review found 38 issues worth fixing on aptosolutions.com, 12 of them high impact, across 102 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.4 s1.9 sMay 9Oct 172.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.5 s
May 16, 20262.3 s
May 23, 20262.2 s
May 30, 20262.2 s
Jun 6, 20262.1 s
Jun 13, 20262.5 s
Jun 20, 20262.7 s
Jun 27, 20263.2 s
Jul 4, 20263.1 s
Jul 11, 20262.8 s
Jul 18, 20262.7 s
Jul 25, 20262.6 s
Aug 1, 20262.8 s
Aug 8, 20263.0 s
Aug 15, 20263.3 s
Aug 22, 20263.0 s
Aug 29, 20262.8 s
Sep 5, 20262.8 s
Sep 12, 20262.8 s
Sep 19, 20262.8 s
Sep 26, 20262.9 s
Oct 3, 20263.1 s
Oct 10, 20262.7 s
Oct 17, 20262.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
162 ms103 msMay 23Oct 17149 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026146 ms
May 30, 2026143 ms
Jun 6, 2026146 ms
Jun 13, 2026143 ms
Jul 11, 2026138 ms
Jul 18, 2026138 ms
Jul 25, 2026138 ms
Aug 1, 2026133 ms
Aug 15, 2026128 ms
Aug 22, 2026110 ms
Aug 29, 2026110 ms
Sep 5, 2026120 ms
Sep 12, 2026135 ms
Sep 19, 2026144 ms
Sep 26, 2026144 ms
Oct 3, 2026155 ms
Oct 10, 2026155 ms
Oct 17, 2026149 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

7 to fix57
  • Improve image delivery

    5.2 s · 1,011 KiB

    1 image could be 1,011 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.8 s

    35 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.8 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.6 s · 238 KiB

    About 238 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 57

    57/100

    Your mobile performance score is 57 (desktop: 84). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    800 ms · 82 KiB

    6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (82 KiB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    750 ms · 116 KiB

    About 116 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 196 ms

    196 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 196 ms of main-thread work and 296 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Hubspot and lfeeder.com and others), adding 538 KiB and 263 ms of main-thread time.

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 163 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 84 but mobile only 57. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 939 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 19 ms

    19 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 19 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.45

    0.45

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.45 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 17.1 s

    17.1 s

    Your largest element takes 17.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Gartner IT Infrastructure Operations & Cloud Strategies Con…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 17.1 s

    17.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 17.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.7 s

    9.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.4 s

    4.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 146 ms to 149 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 11% slower for real visitors

    +11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 155 ms

    155 ms

    Real visitors wait 155 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 113 ms

    113 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 113 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix45
  • Page weight: 27.8 MB in 96 requests

    27.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 27.8 MB in 96 requests on a phone: media 25.5 MB (3), images 1.2 MB (8) and scripts 772 KiB (33). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    Apto-Logo-25-tpt-1.gif weighs 1,014 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (1,014 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (27 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 7.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    7.89 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 7.89 g of CO₂e: 946.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8892
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 10 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9286
  • Title is short (14 characters)

    Your title is only 14 characters: “Apto Solutions”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • Meta description is long (369 characters)

    Your meta description is 369 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 15 links crawlers can't follow

    15 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 143 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 143 pages on aptosolutions.com and 7 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Custom ITAD. Total Coverage. Transparent Results.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.aptosolutions.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.aptosolutions.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description; contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,498 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes /llms.txt (4 KiB, 23 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 5 pages without a meta description

    /who-we-are, /locations, /careers, /blog and /resources have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 25 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 10087
  • 2 small tap targets

    2 of 8 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

2 to fix86
  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

5 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (aptosolutions.com).

  • Valid certificate (76 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE2 verifies for aptosolutions.com and is valid for another 76 days.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://aptosolutions.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 34 links work

    All 34 links checked from your homepage (28 internal, 6 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    aptosolutions.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    aptosolutions.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 25 years old

    25 years

    aptosolutions.com was registered in May 2001 through Network Solutions, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until May 2027

    aptosolutions.com is registered until May 2027.

Content and conversion

1 to fix90
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 4 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 378 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 378 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “CONTACT”.

  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “CONTACT” and “Contact”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and HubSpot.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Email authentication

2 to fix65
  • DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)

    DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be aptosolutions.com is still delivered. Add a report address, check the reports, then move to quarantine.

  • No DKIM key on the usual selectors

    We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.

  • Email authentication score: 65/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

1 checks passed
  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ip4:12.197.248.106 include:aspmx.pardot.com include:mercurygate.net include:8843383.spf0…”.

Privacy and tracking

  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and HubSpot (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 10 cookies set on arrival

    10

    Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 16 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 16 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner

    A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

CMS
WordPress 7.1.3
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Company

Employees
150
Headquarters
Atlanta

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 38 issues on aptosolutions.com, including 16 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25