Website review, no card needed

archidekt.com logo

archidekt.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202658 issues · 112 checks

This review found 58 issues worth fixing on archidekt.com, 18 of them high impact, across 112 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.4 s1.7 sApr 18Oct 32.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20261.8 s
Apr 25, 20261.8 s
May 2, 20261.8 s
May 9, 20261.8 s
May 16, 20261.8 s
May 23, 20262.0 s
May 30, 20262.1 s
Jun 6, 20262.2 s
Jun 13, 20262.3 s
Jun 20, 20262.3 s
Jun 27, 20262.2 s
Jul 4, 20262.2 s
Jul 11, 20262.2 s
Jul 18, 20262.1 s
Jul 25, 20262.1 s
Aug 1, 20262.2 s
Aug 8, 20262.2 s
Aug 15, 20262.2 s
Aug 22, 20262.1 s
Aug 29, 20262.0 s
Sep 5, 20261.9 s
Sep 12, 20262.0 s
Sep 19, 20262.1 s
Sep 26, 20262.2 s
Oct 3, 20262.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
460 ms208 msApr 18Oct 3431 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026302 ms
Apr 25, 2026303 ms
May 2, 2026304 ms
May 9, 2026309 ms
May 16, 2026296 ms
May 23, 2026278 ms
May 30, 2026259 ms
Jun 6, 2026240 ms
Jun 13, 2026237 ms
Jun 20, 2026238 ms
Jun 27, 2026238 ms
Jul 4, 2026238 ms
Jul 11, 2026240 ms
Jul 18, 2026244 ms
Jul 25, 2026263 ms
Aug 1, 2026283 ms
Aug 8, 2026298 ms
Aug 15, 2026324 ms
Aug 22, 2026349 ms
Aug 29, 2026376 ms
Sep 5, 2026397 ms
Sep 12, 2026411 ms
Sep 19, 2026417 ms
Sep 26, 2026422 ms
Oct 3, 2026431 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

13 to fix43
  • Render-blocking requests

    3.4 s

    8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.4 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.6 s · 443 KiB

    About 443 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 43

    43/100

    Your mobile performance score is 43 (desktop: 59). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 4,676 HTML elements

    The page has 4,676 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    300 ms · 2.9 MB

    135 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.9 MB).

  • 9 long tasks on the main thread

    9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 707 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts and JSDelivr CDN and others), adding 3.1 MB and 262 ms of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    347 KiB

    11 images could be 347 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Main-thread work: 3.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 262 ms

    262 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 262 ms of main-thread work and 302 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Other Google APIs/SDKs adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    Other Google APIs/SDKs costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 2.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • JSDelivr CDN adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    JSDelivr CDN costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 416 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • scryfall.io adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    scryfall.io costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 324 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 33 KiB

    About 33 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 8 ms

    8 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 8 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 16.5 s

    16.5 s

    Your largest element takes 16.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 20.8 s

    20.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 20.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.1 s

    7.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 654 ms

    654 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 654 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user INP: 387 ms

    387 ms

    Real visitors wait 387 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 41% slower for real visitors

    +41%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 302 ms to 431 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 26% slower for real visitors

    +26%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • 3 images without width and height

    3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 653 ms

    653 ms

    Real visitors wait 653 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix43
  • Page weight: 7.4 MB in 190 requests

    7.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 7.4 MB in 190 requests on a phone: images 6.0 MB (158), scripts 896 KiB (17) and fonts 443 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 17 images in older formats

    17 images (1.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 20 images below the first screen load straight away

    20 images further down the page (1.2 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    42 KiB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example af266eec-e61b-4bda-be7f-3a5a59eee864.jpg at 571 px wide, shown at 160 px. Resized copies would save about 42 KiB.

  • About 2.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.10 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.10 g of CO₂e: 252.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 7888
  • 49 buttons without a name

    49 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 78 tap targets too small

    78 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 4 text elements with low contrast

    4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 6 links without text

    6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 218 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 8 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 10067
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (28 characters)

    Your title is only 28 characters: “MTG Deck Builder - Archidekt”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (748 characters)

    Your meta description is 748 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 708 internal links, 18 external

    The homepage links to 708 pages on archidekt.com and 18 external pages.

2 checks passed
  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://archidekt.com/sitemaps/index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,154 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix71
  • 2 pages without a title

    /forum/General/Development and /forum/General/General have no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 2 pages share a title

    / and /community all use the title “MTG Deck Builder - Archidekt”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 9 pages share a meta description

    /commander-precons, /random-commander, /compare, /community, /contest and /forum/General/Development and 3 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    /random-commander and /community have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages with very little text

    /random-commander and /collection have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 152 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 9269
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://storage.googleapis.com/archidekt-card-images/fra/6529d399-677e-45a6-ac3e-12a0b10f6c37_art_crop.jpg.

  • 29 small tap targets

    29 of 69 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Scrolls sideways on phones

    On a 390 px-wide phone the page scrolls sideways, a sign that something is wider than the screen.

  • 3 distorted images

    3 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

3 to fix79
  • 1 broken external link

    1 link to other sites is dead, for example https://bsky.app/profile/archidekt.com (404).

  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • 1 link through redirect chains

    1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://archidekt.com/compare.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

4 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (archidekt.com).

  • Valid certificate (67 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WR3 verifies for archidekt.com and is valid for another 67 days.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://archidekt.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    archidekt.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    archidekt.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 8 years old

    8 years

    archidekt.com was registered in Apr 2018 through Squarespace Domains II LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Apr 2027

    archidekt.com is registered until Apr 2027.

Content and conversion

2 to fix83
  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 2,090 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 2,090 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Register” and “Order Up!”.

  • 6 calls to action

    The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Register”, “Order Up!” and “CONTACT”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 83 testimonial or review blocks and 1 trust badge.

Email authentication

1 to fix50
  • No SPF record

    archidekt.com has no SPF record, so mail servers can't tell which servers may send email as you. Your mail lands in spam more often, and anyone can send mail pretending to be you.

  • Email authentication score: 50/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 12 cookies set on arrival

    12

    Opening the homepage sets 12 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 9 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 58 issues on archidekt.com, including 23 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25