Website review, no card needed
archidekt.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202658 issues · 112 checks
This review found 58 issues worth fixing on archidekt.com, 18 of them high impact, across 112 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
68DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 302 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 303 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 304 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 309 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 296 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 278 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 259 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 240 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 237 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 238 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 238 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 238 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 240 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 244 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 263 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 283 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 298 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 324 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 349 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 376 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 397 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 411 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 417 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 422 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 431 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
3.4 s8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.4 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.6 s · 443 KiBAbout 443 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 43
43/100Your mobile performance score is 43 (desktop: 59). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
4,676 HTML elements
The page has 4,676 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
300 ms · 2.9 MB135 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.9 MB).
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 707 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
6 third-party services on the page
6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts and JSDelivr CDN and others), adding 3.1 MB and 262 ms of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
347 KiB11 images could be 347 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Main-thread work: 3.0 s
A phone's processor spends 3.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Google Tag Manager adds 262 ms
262 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 262 ms of main-thread work and 302 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Other Google APIs/SDKs adds 0 ms
0 msOther Google APIs/SDKs costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 2.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
JSDelivr CDN adds 0 ms
0 msJSDelivr CDN costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 416 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
scryfall.io adds 0 ms
0 msscryfall.io costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 324 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 33 KiBAbout 33 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
12 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 8 ms
8 msYour server sent the HTML in 8 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 16.5 s
16.5 sYour largest element takes 16.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 20.8 s
20.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 20.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.7 s
4.7 sThe first text or image appears after 4.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.1 s
7.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 654 ms
654 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 654 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user INP: 387 ms
387 msReal visitors wait 387 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 41% slower for real visitors
+41%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 302 ms to 431 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 26% slower for real visitors
+26%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 images without width and height
3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 653 ms
653 msReal visitors wait 653 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 7.4 MB in 190 requests
7.4 MBYour homepage downloads 7.4 MB in 190 requests on a phone: images 6.0 MB (158), scripts 896 KiB (17) and fonts 443 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
17 images in older formats
17 images (1.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
20 images below the first screen load straight away
20 images further down the page (1.2 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
3 images far larger than shown
42 KiB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example af266eec-e61b-4bda-be7f-3a5a59eee864.jpg at 571 px wide, shown at 160 px. Resized copies would save about 42 KiB.
About 2.1 g of CO₂ per visit
2.10 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.10 g of CO₂e: 252.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
49 buttons without a name
49 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
78 tap targets too small
78 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
4 text elements with low contrast
4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
6 links without text
6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 218 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
40 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 8 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (28 characters)
Your title is only 28 characters: “MTG Deck Builder - Archidekt”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
Meta description is long (748 characters)
Your meta description is 748 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
708 internal links, 18 external
The homepage links to 708 pages on archidekt.com and 18 external pages.
2 checks passed
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://archidekt.com/sitemaps/index.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,154 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages without a title
/forum/General/Development and /forum/General/General have no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
2 pages share a title
/ and /community all use the title “MTG Deck Builder - Archidekt”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
9 pages share a meta description
/commander-precons, /random-commander, /compare, /community, /contest and /forum/General/Development and 3 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
2 pages without an H1
/random-commander and /community have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
2 pages with very little text
/random-commander and /collection have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 152 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://storage.googleapis.com/archidekt-card-images/fra/6529d399-677e-45a6-ac3e-12a0b10f6c37_art_crop.jpg.
29 small tap targets
29 of 69 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Scrolls sideways on phones
On a 390 px-wide phone the page scrolls sideways, a sign that something is wider than the screen.
3 distorted images
3 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
1 broken external link
1 link to other sites is dead, for example https://bsky.app/profile/archidekt.com (404).
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
1 link through redirect chains
1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://archidekt.com/compare.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
4 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (archidekt.com).
Valid certificate (67 days left)
The certificate from Google Trust Services · WR3 verifies for archidekt.com and is valid for another 67 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://archidekt.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3
The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
archidekt.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
archidekt.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 8 years old
8 yearsarchidekt.com was registered in Apr 2018 through Squarespace Domains II LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Apr 2027
archidekt.com is registered until Apr 2027.
Content and conversion
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 2,090 words of copy
The homepage carries about 2,090 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Register” and “Order Up!”.
6 calls to action
The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Register”, “Order Up!” and “CONTACT”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 83 testimonial or review blocks and 1 trust badge.
Email authentication
No SPF record
archidekt.com has no SPF record, so mail servers can't tell which servers may send email as you. Your mail lands in spam more often, and anyone can send mail pretending to be you.
Email authentication score: 50/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
12 cookies set on arrival
12Opening the homepage sets 12 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
9 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This free review found 58 issues on archidekt.com, including 23 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.