Website review, no card needed

architonic.com logo

architonic.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202646 issues · 103 checks

This review found 46 issues worth fixing on architonic.com, 13 of them high impact, across 103 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.8 s3.3 sApr 25Oct 103.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 20263.6 s
May 2, 20263.6 s
May 9, 20263.6 s
May 16, 20263.6 s
May 23, 20263.6 s
May 30, 20263.7 s
Jun 6, 20263.8 s
Jun 13, 20263.8 s
Jun 20, 20263.8 s
Jun 27, 20263.8 s
Jul 4, 20263.7 s
Jul 11, 20263.7 s
Jul 18, 20263.7 s
Jul 25, 20263.7 s
Aug 1, 20263.7 s
Aug 8, 20263.7 s
Aug 15, 20263.7 s
Aug 22, 20263.7 s
Aug 29, 20263.8 s
Sep 5, 20263.8 s
Sep 12, 20263.7 s
Sep 19, 20263.7 s
Sep 26, 20263.6 s
Oct 3, 20263.5 s
Oct 10, 20263.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
333 ms230 msApr 25Oct 10242 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 25, 2026279 ms
May 2, 2026280 ms
May 9, 2026277 ms
May 16, 2026268 ms
May 23, 2026271 ms
May 30, 2026274 ms
Jun 6, 2026290 ms
Jun 13, 2026305 ms
Jun 20, 2026298 ms
Jun 27, 2026295 ms
Jul 4, 2026294 ms
Jul 11, 2026290 ms
Jul 18, 2026298 ms
Jul 25, 2026305 ms
Aug 1, 2026305 ms
Aug 8, 2026313 ms
Aug 15, 2026321 ms
Aug 22, 2026318 ms
Aug 29, 2026316 ms
Sep 5, 2026311 ms
Sep 12, 2026302 ms
Sep 19, 2026293 ms
Sep 26, 2026268 ms
Oct 3, 2026253 ms
Oct 10, 2026242 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

11 to fix52
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    4.1 s · 620 KiB

    About 620 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    950 ms · 8.4 MB

    28 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (8.4 MB).

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google/Doubleclick Ads and consentmanager.net and others), adding 10.7 MB and 605 ms of main-thread time.

  • Other Google APIs/SDKs adds 29 ms

    29 ms

    Other Google APIs/SDKs costs a phone 29 ms of main-thread work and 9.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 52

    52/100

    Your mobile performance score is 52. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    600 ms · 57 KiB

    About 57 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    450 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 450 ms.

  • Main-thread work: 2.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Improve image delivery

    288 KiB

    3 images could be 288 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 191 ms

    191 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 191 ms of main-thread work and 310 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google/Doubleclick Ads adds 159 ms

    159 ms

    Google/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 159 ms of main-thread work and 308 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 12 long tasks on the main thread

    12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 155 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify JavaScript

    12 KiB

    12 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 61 ms

    61 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 61 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 18.1 s

    18.1 s

    Your largest element takes 18.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “When you visit our website we and our partners collect pers…”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 6.5 s

    6.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 6.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 18.3 s

    18.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 18.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.4 s

    7.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Real visitors wait 3.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 249 ms

    249 ms

    Real visitors wait 249 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 286 ms

    286 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 286 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.6 s to 3.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 11% faster for real visitors

    -11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 279 ms to 242 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 12.3 MB in 151 requests

    12.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 12.3 MB in 151 requests on a phone: media 9.8 MB (6), scripts 1.7 MB (97) and images 697 KiB (27). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (178 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 3.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.49 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.49 g of CO₂e: 419.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

8 to fix71
  • 13 buttons without a name

    13 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    12 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 20 text elements with low contrast

    20 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 7 links without text

    7 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 5 form fields without a label

    5 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" do not have accessible names.

    Elements with role="dialog" or role="alertdialog" do not have accessible names. (2 elements).

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

1 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 67 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 10084
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“The destination for premium product and material …” and “The destination for premium product and material …”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.architonic.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 66 internal links, 0 external

    The homepage links to 66 pages on architonic.com and 0 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 140 characters

    Your meta description is 140 characters: “The largest platform for products, materials and concepts for designers and architects. Explore design products and muc…”.

  • Title: 53 characters

    Your title is a healthy 53 characters: “The platform for architecture and design | Architonic”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.architonic.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

2 to fix75
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • Some text only appears after JavaScript runs

    55%

    The HTML your server sends has 369 of the 671 words a browser shows. AI crawlers don't run JavaScript, so they miss the rest.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

2 to fix88
  • 2 pages share a title

    / and /en all use the title “The platform for architecture and design | Architonic”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 13 pages without a meta description

    /en/pg/bedroom-furniture/3220038, /en/pg/complementary-furniture/3221403, /en/pg/kids-furniture/3221427, /en/pg/drainage/3221091, /en/pg/bathroom-furniture/3220069 and /en/pg/spa/3221587 and 7 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 39 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9291
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 17 distorted images

    17 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    79 of 91 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

3 to fix71
  • 4 broken links to your own pages

    4 links from your homepage to your own site are broken, for example https://www.architonic.com/en/b/ld-seating/ (404).

  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

4 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (architonic.com).

  • Valid certificate (190 days left)

    The certificate from Amazon · Amazon RSA 2048 M04 verifies for architonic.com and is valid for another 190 days.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://architonic.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

Domain and trust

  • DNSSEC is off

    architonic.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

3 checks passed
  • Domain is 24 years old

    24 years

    architonic.com was registered in Oct 2002 through GoDaddy.com, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Certificate issuers are restricted

    CAA records allow only letsencrypt.org, pki.goog, ssl.com and comodoca.com to issue certificates for architonic.com, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.

  • Registered until Oct 2027

    architonic.com is registered until Oct 2027.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 671 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 671 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Start exploring”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Hotjar.

Email authentication

95
  • Email authentication score: 95/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 ip4:54.246.95.54 ip4:79.125.25.66 ip4:79.125.6.174 ip4:52.18.25.202 include:servers.mcsv.net include:_spf.google…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “selector1” and “selector2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Hotjar (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (consentmanager) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 8 cookies set on arrival

    8

    Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 20 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 20 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: consentmanager

    A consent management tool (consentmanager) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Tailwind CSS
Analytics
Hotjar

Company

Founded
2003

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 46 issues on architonic.com, including 21 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25