Website review, no card needed

astro.com logo

astro.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 October 202640 issues · 105 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on astro.com, 11 of them high impact, across 105 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.3 s1.3 sApr 18Oct 31.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20261.3 s
Apr 25, 20261.3 s
May 2, 20261.3 s
May 9, 20261.3 s
May 16, 20261.3 s
May 23, 20261.3 s
May 30, 20261.3 s
Jun 6, 20261.3 s
Jun 13, 20261.3 s
Jun 20, 20261.3 s
Jun 27, 20261.3 s
Jul 4, 20261.3 s
Jul 11, 20261.3 s
Jul 18, 20261.3 s
Jul 25, 20261.3 s
Aug 1, 20261.3 s
Aug 8, 20261.3 s
Aug 15, 20261.3 s
Aug 22, 20261.3 s
Aug 29, 20261.3 s
Sep 5, 20261.3 s
Sep 12, 20261.3 s
Sep 19, 20261.3 s
Sep 26, 20261.3 s
Oct 3, 20261.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
134 ms126 msApr 18Oct 3128 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026133 ms
Apr 25, 2026131 ms
May 2, 2026130 ms
May 9, 2026129 ms
May 16, 2026128 ms
May 23, 2026127 ms
May 30, 2026127 ms
Jun 6, 2026127 ms
Jun 13, 2026128 ms
Jun 20, 2026128 ms
Jun 27, 2026129 ms
Jul 4, 2026129 ms
Jul 11, 2026129 ms
Jul 18, 2026128 ms
Jul 25, 2026128 ms
Aug 1, 2026128 ms
Aug 8, 2026128 ms
Aug 15, 2026128 ms
Aug 22, 2026128 ms
Aug 29, 2026127 ms
Sep 5, 2026127 ms
Sep 12, 2026127 ms
Sep 19, 2026127 ms
Sep 26, 2026128 ms
Oct 3, 2026128 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of astro.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. astro.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. astro.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. astro.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. astro.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. astro.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. astro.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. astro.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. astro.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

astro.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

8 to fix63
  • Render-blocking requests

    3.2 s

    18 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.2 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.1 s · 162 KiB

    About 162 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • 5,465 HTML elements

    The page has 5,465 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 1.5 MB

    37 images could be 1.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    900 ms · 231 KiB

    8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (231 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 63

    63/100

    Your mobile performance score is 63. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Font display

    650 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 650 ms).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 80 KiB

    About 80 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 2 third-party services on the page

    2 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics), adding 200 KiB and 219 ms of main-thread time.

  • 5 long tasks on the main thread

    5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 223 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify JavaScript

    150 ms · 21 KiB

    21 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 339 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 111 ms

    111 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 111 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 10.1 s

    10.1 s

    Your largest element takes 10.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “This is the Weekly Horoscope”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.9 s

    3.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 10.3 s

    10.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 10.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 4.8 s

    4.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 28 images without width and height

    28 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 133 ms to 128 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.3 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 179 ms

    179 ms

    Real visitors wait 179 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 114 ms

    114 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 114 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.006

    0.006

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.006, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix58
  • Page weight: 3.1 MB in 85 requests

    3.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.1 MB in 85 requests on a phone: images 2.4 MB (56), scripts 409 KiB (14) and fonts 201 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 12 images in older formats

    12 images (1.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 9 images below the first screen load straight away

    9 images further down the page (635 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    42 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example timelords_logo22_200.png at 200 px wide, shown at 38 px. Resized copies would save about 42 KiB.

  • About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.88 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.88 g of CO₂e: 105.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 7588
  • Unlabelled dropdowns

    2 dropdowns have no label.

  • Input buttons must have discernible text (1 element)

    Input buttons must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 12 text elements with low contrast

    12 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 3 images without alt text

    3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 4 form fields without a label

    4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h4, h2 → h5 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 8 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 6987
  • 208 links crawlers can't follow

    208 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (241 characters)

    Your meta description is 241 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 281 internal links, 2 external

    The homepage links to 281 pages on astro.com and 2 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “The Art of Astrology”.

  • Title: 41 characters

    Your title is a healthy 41 characters: “Astrodienst - The World's Best Horoscopes”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.astro.com/index_e.htm.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.astro.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 1 crawler

    robots.txt blocks CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,527 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 11 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 11 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example /horoskop, whose canonical is /index_g.htm. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 1 page without an H1

    /cgi/scart.cgi has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 162 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    15 of 18 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

2 to fix86
  • http:// does not redirect

    http://astro.com does not redirect to https, so some visitors land on the insecure version.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HTTP/1.1 only

    The server only offers HTTP/1.1, so browsers open several connections and load files more slowly. Most hosts and CDNs turn on HTTP/2 with a setting.

  • 2 redirects before the homepage

    Opening https://astro.com goes through 2 redirects before the homepage loads.

  • 1 link through redirect chains

    1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.astro.com%2Findex_e.htm.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

5 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (astro.com).

  • Valid certificate (83 days left)

    The certificate from Sectigo Limited · Sectigo Public Server Authentication CA EV R36 verifies for astro.com and is valid for another 83 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • All 42 links work

    All 42 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 2 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • DNSSEC is off

    astro.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

3 checks passed
  • Domain is 29 years old

    29 years

    astro.com was registered in Feb 1997 through NameCheap, Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Certificate issuers are restricted

    CAA records allow only sectigo.com to issue certificates for astro.com, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.

  • Registered until Feb 2031

    astro.com is registered until Feb 2031.

Content and conversion

1 to fix92
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,074 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,074 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “ASTRO SHOP”.

  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “"Astro Shop"”, “Astro Shop” and “Contact”.

  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (4 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 testimonial or review blocks and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

Email authentication

90
  • Email authentication score: 90/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 ip4:192.53.104.0/24 include:astro.ch -all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 7 cookies set on arrival

    7

    Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 2 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 40 issues on astro.com, including 17 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25