Website review, no card needed

aur.edu logo

aur.edu website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202655 issues · 115 checks

This review found 55 issues worth fixing on aur.edu, 19 of them high impact, across 115 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.0 s2.2 sMay 9Oct 242.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.9 s
May 16, 20262.8 s
May 23, 20262.8 s
May 30, 20262.8 s
Jun 6, 20262.8 s
Jun 13, 20262.8 s
Jun 20, 20262.7 s
Jun 27, 20262.6 s
Jul 4, 20262.5 s
Jul 11, 20262.5 s
Jul 18, 20262.5 s
Jul 25, 20262.5 s
Aug 1, 20262.4 s
Aug 8, 20262.5 s
Aug 15, 20262.4 s
Aug 22, 20262.4 s
Aug 29, 20262.3 s
Sep 5, 20262.3 s
Sep 12, 20262.3 s
Sep 19, 20262.3 s
Sep 26, 20262.4 s
Oct 3, 20262.6 s
Oct 10, 20262.6 s
Oct 17, 20262.7 s
Oct 24, 20262.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
167 ms134 msMay 9Oct 24143 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026143 ms
May 16, 2026139 ms
May 23, 2026141 ms
May 30, 2026144 ms
Jun 6, 2026147 ms
Jun 13, 2026159 ms
Jun 20, 2026163 ms
Jun 27, 2026158 ms
Jul 4, 2026152 ms
Jul 11, 2026143 ms
Jul 18, 2026138 ms
Jul 25, 2026142 ms
Aug 1, 2026144 ms
Aug 8, 2026155 ms
Aug 15, 2026158 ms
Aug 22, 2026151 ms
Aug 29, 2026151 ms
Sep 5, 2026146 ms
Sep 12, 2026141 ms
Sep 19, 2026144 ms
Sep 26, 2026145 ms
Oct 3, 2026142 ms
Oct 10, 2026150 ms
Oct 17, 2026148 ms
Oct 24, 2026143 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of aur.edu (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. aur.edu at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. aur.edu at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. aur.edu at 1.4 s1.4 s
  4. aur.edu at 1.8 s1.8 s
  5. aur.edu at 2.3 s2.3 s
  6. aur.edu at 2.8 s2.8 s
  7. aur.edu at 3.2 s3.2 s
  8. aur.edu at 3.7 s3.7 s

aur.edu does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

11 to fix54
  • Improve image delivery

    4.3 s · 14.2 MB

    33 images could be 14.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.4 s · 1.1 MB

    About 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.4 s

    35 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.4 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.4 MB

    36 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.4 MB).

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and TikTok and others), adding 2.0 MB and 981 ms of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 54

    54/100

    Your mobile performance score is 54. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    600 ms · 179 KiB

    About 179 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • YouTube adds 344 ms

    344 ms

    YouTube costs a phone 344 ms of main-thread work and 980 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 300 ms

    300 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 300 ms of main-thread work and 377 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 2,356 HTML elements

    The page has 2,356 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 12 long tasks on the main thread

    12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 208 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    135 KiB

    135 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    38 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 38 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify JavaScript

    35 KiB

    35 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Minify CSS

    13 KiB

    13 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 18 ms

    18 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 18 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors wait 2.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 16.5 s

    16.5 s

    Your largest element takes 16.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 24.9 s

    24.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 24.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.1 s

    6.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    Real visitors wait 3.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 418 ms

    418 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 418 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 27 images without width and height

    27 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 143 ms to 143 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.9 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 149 ms

    149 ms

    Real visitors wait 149 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.007

    0.007

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.007, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 67.1 MB in 177 requests

    67.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 67.1 MB in 177 requests on a phone: media 49.8 MB (5), images 14.8 MB (62) and scripts 2.0 MB (35). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    2 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example aur_50_retina.png at 1,044 px wide, shown at 341 px. Resized copies would save about 2 KiB.

  • 6 images in older formats

    6 images (273 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 5 images below the first screen load straight away

    5 images further down the page (204 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 19.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    19.03 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 19.03 g of CO₂e: 2283.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

13 to fixGoogle 7282
  • ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (1 element)

    ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 22 text elements with low contrast

    22 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Hidden but focusable

    1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • Form elements should have a visible label (1 element)

    Form elements should have a visible label: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • 5 images without alt text

    5 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (5 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 53 links without text

    53 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

1 checks passed
  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 13 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 7780
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 12 links with vague text

    12 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 640 internal links, 97 external

    The homepage links to 640 pages on aur.edu and 97 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 104 characters

    Your meta description is 104 characters: “The International American University in Rome, Italy, offering US accredited Bachelor and Master degrees”.

  • Title: 33 characters

    Your title is a healthy 33 characters: “The American University of Rome |”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://aur.edu/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://aur.edu/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,103 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix81
  • 2 pages share a title

    /aur-difference and /rooted-history all use the title “The AUR Difference | The American University of Rome”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 5 pages without a meta description

    /aurs-20-most-frequently-asked-questions, /aur-video-gallery, /news-events, /past-events and /honorary-degree-recipients-american-university-rome have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    /aur-difference and /rooted-history use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /rooted-history, whose canonical is /aur-difference. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 4 pages slow to respond

    /map-and-directions, /past-events, /aur-unplugged-get-know-aur-people and /faculty-administration took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 150 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 5083
  • 9 small tap targets

    9 of 38 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 5 third-party cookies

    5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 2 low-resolution images

    2 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

2 to fix86
  • 2 broken external links

    2 links to other sites are dead, for example https://www.linkedin.com/edu/school?id=42888&trk=edu-cp-title (999).

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • Short HSTS lifetime

    HSTS is set, but max-age is 0 days; one year is the recommended minimum.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

5 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (aur.edu).

  • Valid certificate (83 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR2 verifies for aur.edu and is valid for another 83 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://aur.edu redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    aur.edu has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

Content and conversion

2 to fix86
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • About 980 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 980 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “APPLY NOW” and “CONTACT US”.

  • 29 calls to action

    The homepage has 29 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “The AUR Shop - Branded Items” and “Book a Campus Tour”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 7 phone links and 0 email links.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Email authentication

95
  • Email authentication score: 95/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:sendersrv.com ip4:35.231.30.42 ip4:34.148.60.250 ip4:90.147.182.241 include:spf.symplicity.com include:…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1” and “selector2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, TikTok Pixel and Yandex Metrica (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 14 cookies set on arrival

    14

    Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 30 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 30 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

CMS
Drupal 7 (https://www.drupal.org)
Framework
jQuery
Hosting
Fastly

Company

Founded
1969

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 55 issues on aur.edu, including 21 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25