Website review, no card needed
azercell.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202615 issues · 57 checks
This review found 15 issues worth fixing on azercell.com, 4 of them high impact, across 57 checks. The most urgent: 11 linked pages are broken. Google's speed test didn't respond, so speed is not measured here; your full playbook measures it. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
Not scored yet: Google's speed test didn't run in this review. Re-run the review to get a score.
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 199 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 187 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 182 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 182 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 182 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 179 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Not measured in this review.
Core Web Vitals
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 199 ms to 179 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on your site (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors wait 1.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 179 ms
179 msReal visitors wait 179 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 0.9 s
0.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 476 ms
476 msReal visitors wait 476 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 29% faster for real visitors
-29%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Accessibility
5 images without alt text
5 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
6 links without text
6 links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
SEO
Title is long (73 characters)
Your title is 73 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Azercell - Sənə yaxın gələcək | Azərbaycanın lider mobil rabitə operatoru”.
5 H1 headlines
There are 5 <h1> headlines (““30 il səninlə” lotereyası”, “Dünyaya bizimlə bax” and “Fərqli ehtiyaclara uyğun seçimlər”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Structured data has 6 problems
Structured data found (BreadcrumbList and Organization) but with 6 problems, for example “Organization: url is not an absolute URL ("//www.azercell.com")”.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.azercell.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at azercell.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
205 internal links, 19 external
The homepage links to 205 pages on azercell.com and 19 external pages.
3 checks passed
Meta description: 133 characters
Your meta description is 133 characters: “Azercell-dən fərdi təkliflər - sərfəli tariflər, kampaniyalar və əlçatan xidmətlər. 24/7 Müştəri Xidmətləri. 5 milyonda…”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.azercell.com/az/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Other pages
11 linked pages are broken
Your homepage links to /az/personal/plans-and-services/5g.html, /ru, /az/az, /az/personal/join_azercell.html, /az/personal/campaigns.html and /az/personal/support.html and 5 others, which answer with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop them.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 69 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 4 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 4 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
15 broken links to your own pages
15 links from your homepage to your own site are broken, for example https://www.azercell.com/az/personal/plans-and-services/5g.html (network).
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
1 link through redirect chains
1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://facebook.com/azercell.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
3 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (azercell.com).
Valid certificate (35 days left)
The certificate from GoDaddy.com, Inc. · Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2 verifies for azercell.com and is valid for another 35 days.
http:// redirects to https
http://azercell.com redirects to the secure version.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
azercell.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
azercell.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 28 years old
28 yearsazercell.com was registered in Dec 1997 through Network Solutions, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Dec 2033
azercell.com is registered until Dec 2033.
Content and conversion
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: a star rating. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 783 words of copy
The homepage carries about 783 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
5 short forms
5 short forms (7 fields at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be azercell.com is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.
Email authentication score: 75/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 ip4:217.168.177.101 ip4:5.191.90.6 ip4:5.191.90.87 ip4:5.191.90.88 a mx a:mailgw.azercell.com a:mailgw-a.azercel…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “s1”, “s2” and “default”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Hosting
- Azercell
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 15 issues on azercell.com, including 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.