azuga.com website review

About 431 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.

3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.3 s.

About 139 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.

19 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (216 KiB).

Your mobile performance score is 46. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, website-files.com and Hubspot and others), adding 2.5 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.

Google Tag Manager costs a phone 565 ms of main-thread work and 770 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

website-files.com costs a phone 297 ms of main-thread work and 1.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

The page has 2,896 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

A phone's processor spends 2.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 171 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

Polyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

8 images could be 109 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

Your largest element takes 20.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “GPS fleet tracking and dual-facing dashcam solutions to kee…”.

The page becomes fully interactive after 20.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

The first text or image appears after 4.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

Visually, the page fills in at 8.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

Real visitors wait 2.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

Real visitors see the first content after 2.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

Scripts block taps and scrolling for 473 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

39 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Your homepage downloads 2.8 MB in 125 requests on a phone: scripts 1.3 MB (38), images 792 KiB (46) and stylesheets 281 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

2 images (68 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

1 image further down the page (33 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.80 g of CO₂e: 96.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

17 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

All page content should be contained by landmarks: 80 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

Your meta description is 224 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

Structured data found (Organization) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: url is not an absolute URL ("/")”.

8 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

The homepage links to 190 pages on azuga.com and 16 external pages.

/scheduled-maintenance is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

/contact-us has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 82 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=35000127&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=0a4a8cf2-748f-4a0a-ae5b-47526516f862&bo=1&sid=9e9e3c70d31e11f1a963d35f53a2c5ca&vid=9e9e4db0d31e11f182d4079892b34a65&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=91.

3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “user is not defined”.

No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

azuga.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

azuga.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

The homepage carries about 1,497 words of visible text.

DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be azuga.com is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.

Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

Loading the homepage contacts 45 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.