Website review, no card needed
baller.co.id website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202641 issues · 86 checks
This review found 41 issues worth fixing on baller.co.id, 16 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
65D- #101,236 of 108,958 reviewed websitesbeats 6%
- #59,577 of 61,775 online storesbeats 3%
- #54,721 of 56,370 Shopify storesbeats 2%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 3.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 181 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 220 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 222 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 220 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 232 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 221 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 216 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 217 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 220 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 214 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 218 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 219 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 220 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 218 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 224 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
2.0 s · 766 KiB11 images could be 766 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.0 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.1 s22 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.
Mobile performance score: 35
35/100Your mobile performance score is 35. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.3 s
A phone's processor spends 4.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, growave.io and Shopify and others), adding 1.1 MB and 986 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
450 ms · 376 KiBAbout 376 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 346 ms
346 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 346 ms of main-thread work and 377 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
growave.io adds 324 ms
324 msgrowave.io costs a phone 324 ms of main-thread work and 251 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
12 long tasks on the main thread
12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 268 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
2,253 HTML elements
The page has 2,253 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
178 KiB6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (178 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 27 KiBAbout 27 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
62 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 62 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 10 ms
10 msYour server sent the HTML in 10 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 8.6 s
8.6 sYour largest element takes 8.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “banner-image”.
Time to Interactive: 14.8 s
14.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 14.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.501
0.501The layout shifts by 0.501 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Speed Index: 7.4 s
7.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.22
0.22For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.22 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 24% slower for real visitors
+24%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 181 ms to 224 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 447 ms
447 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 447 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
21 images without width and height
21 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
First Contentful Paint: 1.8 s
1.8 sThe first text or image appears after 1.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 18% slower for real visitors
+18%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user INP: 167 ms
167 msReal visitors wait 167 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 745 ms
745 msReal visitors wait 745 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.6 MB in 237 requests
3.6 MBYour homepage downloads 3.6 MB in 237 requests on a phone: images 1.3 MB (39), scripts 1.2 MB (70) and other files 748 KiB (94). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
197 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example Mobile_-_Pet_Pers_1.jpg at 3,125 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 197 KiB.
3 images in older formats
3 images (204 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
4 images below the first screen load straight away
4 images further down the page (233 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit
1.02 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.02 g of CO₂e: 122.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
6 buttons without a name
6 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (36 elements)
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 36 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
13 tap targets too small
13 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Hidden but focusable
2 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
8 images without alt text
8 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
3 links without text
3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
47 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 8 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Baller Luggage Koper Alumunium Indonesia” and “Baller Indonesia”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
165 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 165 pages on baller.co.id and 5 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 160 characters
Your meta description is 160 characters: “Koper Baller dengan bahan aluminium yang kuat dan garansi 5 tahun. Tersedia pengiriman same-day (Jabodetabek). Baller, …”.
Title: 47 characters
Your title is a healthy 47 characters: “Koper Baller – Baller Travel – Baller Indonesia”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://baller.co.id/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://baller.co.id/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,271 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://baller.co.id/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page points its canonical at the homepage
https://baller.co.id/products/all-day-duffel declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.
2 pages share a title
/ and https://baller.co.id/products/all-day-duffel all use the title “Koper Baller – Baller Travel – Baller Indonesia”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
4 pages without a meta description
https://baller.co.id/collections/hybrid, https://baller.co.id/collections/expandable, https://baller.co.id/collections/zipper and https://baller.co.id/collections/lightweight have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages without an H1
https://baller.co.id/pages/sale and https://baller.co.id/pages/luggage-comparison have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
3 pages slow to respond
https://baller.co.id/collections/luggage, https://baller.co.id/collections/aluminium and https://baller.co.id/pages/luggage-comparison took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 50 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_TUNNEL_CONNECTION_FAILED”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
41 of 51 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 808 words of copy
The homepage carries about 808 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Join Langganan”.
20 short forms
20 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 16 testimonial or review blocks and 1 customer or partner logo.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (CookieYes) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
8 cookies set on arrival
8Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
28 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 28 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: CookieYes
A consent management tool (CookieYes) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at baller.co.id, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 5 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Font Picker · Zepto Product Personalizer · Hulk Form Builder · Growave Loyalty Wishlist · mycustomizer.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 41 issues on baller.co.id, including 22 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.