Website review, no card needed

bcv.ch logo

bcv.ch website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 6 November 202638 issues · 85 checks

This review found 38 issues worth fixing on bcv.ch, 15 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.6 s1.3 sMay 16Oct 311.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.4 s
May 23, 20261.4 s
May 30, 20261.4 s
Jun 6, 20261.4 s
Jun 13, 20261.4 s
Jun 20, 20261.3 s
Jun 27, 20261.4 s
Jul 4, 20261.4 s
Jul 11, 20261.4 s
Jul 18, 20261.5 s
Jul 25, 20261.5 s
Aug 1, 20261.5 s
Aug 8, 20261.5 s
Aug 15, 20261.5 s
Aug 22, 20261.5 s
Aug 29, 20261.5 s
Sep 5, 20261.5 s
Sep 12, 20261.5 s
Sep 19, 20261.4 s
Sep 26, 20261.4 s
Oct 3, 20261.3 s
Oct 10, 20261.3 s
Oct 17, 20261.3 s
Oct 24, 20261.3 s
Oct 31, 20261.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
109 ms94 msMay 16Oct 31100 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 202696 ms
May 23, 202696 ms
May 30, 202697 ms
Jun 6, 202698 ms
Jun 13, 202697 ms
Jun 20, 202697 ms
Jun 27, 202698 ms
Jul 4, 2026102 ms
Jul 11, 2026103 ms
Jul 18, 2026103 ms
Jul 25, 2026103 ms
Aug 1, 2026103 ms
Aug 8, 2026103 ms
Aug 15, 2026104 ms
Aug 22, 2026103 ms
Aug 29, 2026104 ms
Sep 5, 2026104 ms
Sep 12, 2026106 ms
Sep 19, 2026107 ms
Sep 26, 2026104 ms
Oct 3, 2026104 ms
Oct 10, 2026102 ms
Oct 17, 2026103 ms
Oct 24, 2026103 ms
Oct 31, 2026100 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of bcv.ch (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. bcv.ch at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. bcv.ch at 1.9 s1.9 s
  3. bcv.ch at 2.8 s2.8 s
  4. bcv.ch at 3.8 s3.8 s
  5. bcv.ch at 4.7 s4.7 s
  6. bcv.ch at 5.6 s5.6 s
  7. bcv.ch at 6.6 s6.6 s
  8. bcv.ch at 7.5 s7.5 s

Speed

6 to fix45
  • Render-blocking requests

    4.5 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.5 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    2.4 s · 491 KiB

    About 491 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 45

    45/100

    Your mobile performance score is 45. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Improve image delivery

    550 ms · 4.5 MB

    16 images could be 4.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 550 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    600 ms · 1.1 MB

    About 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    394 KiB

    1 file is served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (394 KiB).

  • Font display

    200 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 200 ms).

  • Document request latency

    70 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    65 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 65 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 60 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • 1 third-party service on the page

    1 third-party service load with your homepage (Adobe Tag Manager), adding 1 KiB and 0 ms of main-thread time.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 285 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 436 ms

    436 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 436 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Speed Index: 15.5 s

    15.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 15.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.3 s

    7.3 s

    Your largest element takes 7.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “BCV - Solutions patrimoniales”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.9 s

    4.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 13.4 s

    13.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 13.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.243

    0.243

    The layout shifts by 0.243 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 14 images without width and height

    14 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 96 ms to 100 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.4 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 98 ms

    98 ms

    Real visitors wait 98 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 377 ms

    377 ms

    Real visitors wait 377 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 5 ms

    5 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 5 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 8.2 MB in 61 requests

    8.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 8.2 MB in 61 requests on a phone: images 5.4 MB (24), scripts 1.9 MB (11) and stylesheets 522 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 3.4 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    2.8 MB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example PIB romand 2026.jpg at 4,096 px wide, shown at 370 px. Resized copies would save about 2.8 MB.

  • 18 images in older formats

    18 images (5.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 11 images below the first screen load straight away

    11 images further down the page (4.3 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 2.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.31 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.31 g of CO₂e: 277.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8190
  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 19 text elements with low contrast

    19 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Links look like plain text

    3 links inside paragraphs rely on colour alone to stand out.

  • 3 images without alt text

    3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (40 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 40 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 13 links without text

    13 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 49 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 57 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 8 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 6985
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.bcv.ch/fr/home.sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • Invalid hreflang

    Your hreflang tags are invalid, so Google may show the wrong language version.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 75 internal links, 9 external

    The homepage links to 75 pages on bcv.ch and 9 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 142 characters

    Your meta description is 142 characters: “La banque des Vaudoises et des Vaudois depuis 1845 et la première banque du canton auprès de la clientèle des particuli…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Prestations en ligne”.

  • Title: 31 characters

    Your title is a healthy 31 characters: “BCV - Banque Cantonale Vaudoise”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.bcv.ch/fr/home.html.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (774 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

5 to fix70
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    /vfh is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 3 pages share a title

    /, /fr/home.html and /vfh all use the title “BCV - Banque Cantonale Vaudoise”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 11 pages without a meta description

    /fr/home/particuliers/produits/e-banking/cybersecurite.html, /fr/home/particuliers.html, /fr/home/private-banking.html, /fr/home/entreprises-et-institutions.html, /fr/home/la-bcv/a-propos-de-nous/ou-nous-trouver.html and /vfh and 5 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /de/home.html, whose canonical is /de/home/die-bcv.html. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 1 page without an H1

    /vfh has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 8 pages slow to respond

    /fr/home/particuliers/produits/e-banking/cybersecurite.html, /fr/home.html, /fr/home/particuliers.html, /fr/home/private-banking.html, /vfh and /de/home.html and 2 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 38 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

2 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    16 of 19 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix67
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 673 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 673 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact”.

  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact” and “Aide et contact”.

  • 4 short forms

    4 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

  • 14 cookies set on arrival

    14

    Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 1 other company contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 1 host run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at bcv.ch, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Hosting
Banque Cantonale Vaudoise

Company

Founded
1845
Headquarters
Lausanne

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 38 issues on bcv.ch, including 12 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25