Website review, no card needed

beautypass.com logo

beautypass.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202638 issues · 81 checks

This review found 38 issues worth fixing on beautypass.com, 16 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.4 s3.6 sMay 16Oct 313.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20264.1 s
May 23, 20264.1 s
May 30, 20264.2 s
Jun 6, 20264.2 s
Jun 13, 20264.2 s
Jun 20, 20264.2 s
Jun 27, 20264.2 s
Jul 4, 20264.2 s
Jul 11, 20264.2 s
Jul 18, 20264.2 s
Jul 25, 20264.2 s
Aug 1, 20264.1 s
Aug 8, 20264.0 s
Aug 15, 20263.8 s
Aug 22, 20263.8 s
Aug 29, 20263.7 s
Sep 5, 20263.7 s
Sep 12, 20264.0 s
Sep 19, 20264.0 s
Sep 26, 20264.1 s
Oct 3, 20264.3 s
Oct 10, 20264.2 s
Oct 17, 20264.2 s
Oct 24, 20264.0 s
Oct 31, 20263.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
229 ms166 msMay 16Oct 31213 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026173 ms
May 23, 2026187 ms
May 30, 2026195 ms
Jun 6, 2026212 ms
Jun 13, 2026200 ms
Jun 20, 2026187 ms
Jun 27, 2026188 ms
Jul 4, 2026194 ms
Jul 11, 2026205 ms
Jul 18, 2026214 ms
Jul 25, 2026212 ms
Aug 1, 2026212 ms
Aug 8, 2026212 ms
Aug 15, 2026209 ms
Aug 22, 2026209 ms
Aug 29, 2026197 ms
Sep 5, 2026185 ms
Sep 12, 2026196 ms
Sep 19, 2026196 ms
Sep 26, 2026207 ms
Oct 3, 2026222 ms
Oct 10, 2026203 ms
Oct 17, 2026212 ms
Oct 24, 2026208 ms
Oct 31, 2026213 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of beautypass.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. beautypass.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. beautypass.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  3. beautypass.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  4. beautypass.com at 3.7 s3.7 s
  5. beautypass.com at 4.6 s4.6 s
  6. beautypass.com at 5.6 s5.6 s
  7. beautypass.com at 6.5 s6.5 s
  8. beautypass.com at 7.4 s7.4 s

Speed

12 to fix32
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    12.9 s · 1.7 MB

    About 1.7 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 12.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    5.3 s · 1,012 KiB

    19 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1,012 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 32

    32/100

    Your mobile performance score is 32. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 5.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, route.com and hsappstatic.net and others), adding 3.7 MB and 2.3 s of main-thread time.

  • Google CDN adds 921 ms

    921 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 921 ms of main-thread work and 1.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 111 KiB

    About 111 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 468 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • route.com adds 393 ms

    393 ms

    route.com costs a phone 393 ms of main-thread work and 542 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • hsappstatic.net adds 352 ms

    352 ms

    hsappstatic.net costs a phone 352 ms of main-thread work and 876 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Hubspot adds 278 ms

    278 ms

    Hubspot costs a phone 278 ms of main-thread work and 420 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    300 ms

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 300 ms.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 32 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 32 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Improve image delivery

    14 KiB

    1 image could be 14 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Minify CSS

    6 KiB

    6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.4 s

    4.4 s

    Real visitors wait 4.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 4.3 s

    4.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 4.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 12.3 s

    12.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 12.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 27.1 s

    27.1 s

    Your largest element takes 27.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 31.4 s

    31.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 31.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 12.7 s

    12.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 12.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 17% slower for real visitors

    +17%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 173 ms to 213 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.1 s to 3.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 95 ms

    95 ms

    Real visitors wait 95 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 748 ms

    748 ms

    Real visitors wait 748 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix33
  • Page weight: 5.9 MB in 203 requests

    5.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.9 MB in 203 requests on a phone: scripts 3.4 MB (73), other files 1.5 MB (83) and fonts 450 KiB (14). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.67 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.67 g of CO₂e: 200.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9388
  • Delayed refresh under 20 hours must not be used (1 element)

    Delayed refresh under 20 hours must not be used: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 8 tap targets too small

    8 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 7 text elements with low contrast

    7 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 10 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 20 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 23 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 20 passed and 3 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 8584
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 15 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 15 pages on beautypass.com and 6 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “BeautyPass”.

  • Title: 37 characters

    Your title is a healthy 37 characters: “NewBeauty Limited Products and Offers”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://beautypass.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://beautypass.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://beautypass.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

100
  • 5 internal pages checked

    We fetched 5 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    1 page of 5 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 1 page that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 1 page that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 6587
  • 1 third-party cookie

    1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 429 ()”.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 6 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 10 words

    The homepage has only about 10 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

2 checks passed
  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “JOIN NOW”, “JOIN NOW WITH INVITE CODE” and “Contact Us”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics and HubSpot.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 2 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at beautypass.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 11 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Attentive · Ab Google Analytics · Cbb Add To Cart · Minmaxify Order Limits · Upseller Product Upsell · Hextom Sales Boost · azureedge.net · klaviyo.com · route.com · attn.tv · Swym Wishlist Plus

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 38 issues on beautypass.com, including 20 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25