Website review, no card needed
bellamianta.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 8 November 202649 issues · 93 checks
This review found 49 issues worth fixing on bellamianta.com, 17 of them high impact, across 93 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
61D- #105,345 of 108,838 reviewed websitesbeats 3%
- #61,004 of 61,763 online storesbeats 1%
- #55,835 of 56,363 Shopify storesbeats 1%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 233 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 229 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 229 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 237 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 239 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 246 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 246 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 258 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 258 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 258 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 261 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 260 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 295 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 306 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 312 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 311 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 298 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 302 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 307 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 319 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 319 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 318 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 314 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 315 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 313 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.6 s
3.1 s
4.7 s
6.2 s
7.8 s
9.3 s
10.9 s
12.5 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.8 s · 1.1 MBAbout 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.8 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.3 s · 343 KiB28 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (343 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
1.3 s8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.3 s.
Main-thread work: 12.1 s
A phone's processor spends 12.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 25
25/100Your mobile performance score is 25. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
4,411 HTML elements
The page has 4,411 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Shopify, Amazon Web Services and rebuyengine.com and others), adding 6.5 MB and 2.4 s of main-thread time.
Shopify adds 699 ms
699 msShopify costs a phone 699 ms of main-thread work and 5.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
600 ms · 101 KiBAbout 101 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Amazon Web Services adds 588 ms
588 msAmazon Web Services costs a phone 588 ms of main-thread work and 29 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Minify JavaScript
450 ms · 25 KiB25 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 271 KiB15 images could be 271 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
rebuyengine.com adds 309 ms
309 msrebuyengine.com costs a phone 309 ms of main-thread work and 332 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Klaviyo adds 291 ms
291 msKlaviyo costs a phone 291 ms of main-thread work and 329 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
gotolstoy.com adds 280 ms
280 msgotolstoy.com costs a phone 280 ms of main-thread work and 83 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 273 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 67 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 67 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 5 KiB5 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 25 ms
25 msYour server sent the HTML in 25 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.28
0.28For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.28 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 24.8 s
24.8 sYour largest element takes 24.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 32.7 s
32.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 32.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 12.5 s
12.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.6 s
1.6 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.6 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.266
0.266The layout shifts by 0.266 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Real-user LCP: 3.4 s
3.4 sReal visitors wait 3.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 282 ms
282 msReal visitors wait 282 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 36% slower for real visitors
+36%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 233 ms to 313 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) got 11% slower for real visitors
+11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user FCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 605 ms
605 msReal visitors wait 605 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 1.5 s
1.5 sThe first text or image appears after 1.5 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 13.5 MB in 375 requests
13.5 MBYour homepage downloads 13.5 MB in 375 requests on a phone: media 6.8 MB (1), scripts 2.6 MB (160) and fonts 1.4 MB (13). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
30 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example LG_4_2000x_0963a068-3e58-4f60-8a37-dacb16421a70_500x.webp at 500 px wide, shown at 116 px. Resized copies would save about 30 KiB.
2 images in older formats
2 images (92 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
4 images below the first screen load straight away
4 images further down the page (154 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 3.8 g of CO₂ per visit
3.84 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.84 g of CO₂e: 460.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Invalid ARIA attributes
21 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
16 text elements with low contrast
16 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (102 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 102 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
151 form fields without a label
151 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
24 links without text
24 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h6 and h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 131 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 6 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Meta description is long (296 characters)
Your meta description is 296 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (Organization and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: potentialAction.target is not an absolute URL ("https://bellamianta.com/search?q={search_term_string}")”.
3 links crawlers can't follow
3 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
193 internal links, 7 external
The homepage links to 193 pages on bellamianta.com and 7 external pages.
6 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Shop Best Sellers”.
Title: 63 characters
Your title is a healthy 63 characters: “Bellamianta Luxury Tanning | Self Tanning, Skincare & Cosmetics”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://bellamianta.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://bellamianta.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,976 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://bellamianta.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
https://bellamianta.com/collections/best-sellers-1/products/tanning-mousse and https://bellamianta.com/collections/mousse all use the title “Tanning Mousse - Bellamianta”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
2 pages without a meta description
https://bellamianta.com/collections/liquid and https://bellamianta.com/collections/mousse have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
4 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 4 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://bellamianta.com/collections/best-sellers-1/products/tanning-oil, whose canonical is https://bellamianta.com/products/tanning-oil. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 74 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 third-party cookie
1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 low-resolution image
1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
47 of 52 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
A 18-field form
Your longest form asks for 18 fields (0 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 762 words of copy
The homepage carries about 762 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
11 calls to action
The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “SHOP BY CATEGORY”, “SHOP ALL” and “SHOP NOW”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 37 testimonial or review blocks, a star rating and 3 trust badges.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
24 cookies set on arrival
24Opening the homepage sets 24 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
46 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 46 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at bellamianta.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 18 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Ecomposer Builder · Gsc Countdown Timer · Powerful Form Builder · Loyalty Rewards And Referrals · Gift Box · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Avada Seo Ai Blog · Judge Me Reviews · Swym Wishlist Plus · Tolstoy · Forms · amazonaws.com · snapchat.com · rebuyengine.com · discounthuntapp.com · googleapis.com · socialsnowball.io · rechargecdn.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 49 issues on bellamianta.com, including 27 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.