Website review, no card needed
betterpackaging.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 November 202641 issues · 86 checks
This review found 41 issues worth fixing on betterpackaging.com, 10 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 16.0 MB in 257 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
78C- #55,517 of 109,350 reviewed websitesbeats 44%
- #36,297 of 61,859 online storesbeats 36%
- #34,700 of 56,401 Shopify storesbeats 33%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 2.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 112 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 148 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.6 s17 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.
Main-thread work: 6.4 s
A phone's processor spends 6.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Hubspot and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 4.9 MB and 2.2 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.5 MBAbout 2.5 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Google CDN adds 924 ms
924 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 924 ms of main-thread work and 2.7 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 941 KiB27 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (941 KiB).
Improve image delivery
850 ms · 208 KiB2 images could be 208 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 850 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 50
50/100Your mobile performance score is 50. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 80 KiBAbout 80 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Hubspot adds 300 ms
300 msHubspot costs a phone 300 ms of main-thread work and 750 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 273 ms
273 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 273 ms of main-thread work and 343 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Shopify adds 213 ms
213 msShopify costs a phone 213 ms of main-thread work and 470 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
1,731 HTML elements
The page has 1,731 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 183 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
55 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 55 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Duplicated JavaScript
16 KiB16 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
Minify CSS
10 KiB10 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 98 ms
98 msYour server sent the HTML in 98 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 38.4 s
38.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 38.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 11.4 s
11.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 5.3 s
5.3 sYour largest element takes 5.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Real-user CLS: 0.13
0.13For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.13 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 24% slower for real visitors
+24%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 112 ms to 148 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 563 ms
563 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 563 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s
2.1 sThe first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.125
0.125The layout shifts by 0.125 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
3 images without width and height
3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) got 15% slower for real visitors
+15%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 2.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 642 ms
642 msReal visitors wait 642 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 16.0 MB in 257 requests
16.0 MBYour homepage downloads 16.0 MB in 257 requests on a phone: media 7.9 MB (2), scripts 4.6 MB (95) and other files 2.1 MB (81). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
16 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example 2018-B-Corp-wTag-L.svg at 273 px wide, shown at 76 px. Resized copies would save about 16 KiB.
3 images in older formats
3 images (300 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 4.5 g of CO₂ per visit
4.53 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.53 g of CO₂e: 543.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
Invalid ARIA attributes
2 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
19 tap targets too small
19 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
1 image without alt text
1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (76 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 76 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
11 form fields without a label
11 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
8 links without text
8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (8 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
47 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 6 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Meta description is long (238 characters)
Your meta description is 238 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
5 links crawlers can't follow
5 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
3 links with vague text
3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
143 internal links, 16 external
The homepage links to 143 pages on betterpackaging.com and 16 external pages.
7 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Better Packaging Co”.
Title: 41 characters
Your title is a healthy 41 characters: “Better Packaging | Eco friendly packaging”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.betterpackaging.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Brand, Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.betterpackaging.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Parts of the site are closed to 2 AI crawlers
Your robots.txt lets ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User) and Perplexity (PerplexityBot) read the homepage but closes other sections to them, so answers about those pages can't cite you.
3 checks passed
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details; logo would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,120 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.betterpackaging.com/llms.txt (4 KiB, 1 link), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
7 pages without a meta description
https://www.betterpackaging.com/pages/what-is-ocean-bound-plastic, https://www.betterpackaging.com/pages/bamboo-packaging, https://www.betterpackaging.com/pages/what-is-compostable-packaging, https://www.betterpackaging.com/pages/what-is-custom-packaging, https://www.betterpackaging.com/pages/how-to-compost-or-recycle and https://www.betterpackaging.com/pages/supply-chain-product-range and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.betterpackaging.com/blogs/insights/pollastic-meets-global-packaging-regulations-the-detail, whose canonical is https://www.betterpackaging.com/blogs/insights/pollastic-meets-global-packaging-regulations-here-s-the-detail. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
1 page without an H1
https://www.betterpackaging.com/pages/how-to-compost-or-recycle has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 56 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
59 of 65 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
About 737 words of copy
The homepage carries about 737 words of visible text.
7 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn more” and “SHOP NOW”.
12 calls to action
The homepage has 12 calls to action, for example “Learn more”, “Shop Now” and “Contact Us”.
7 short forms
7 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar and HubSpot.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and HubSpot and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
23 cookies set on arrival
23Opening the homepage sets 23 cookies, 7 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
42 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 42 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at betterpackaging.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 7 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Pandectes Gdpr · Judge Me Reviews · Sami B2b Lock · Gdpr Cookie Consent · Pdf Invoice Customizer · Wholesale Lock Hide Price · Ecomsend Restock
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Hotjar
- Hosting
- Shopify
Company
- Founded
- 2018
- Headquarters
- Auckland
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 41 issues on betterpackaging.com, including 23 speed issues and 3 SEO issues. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.